Skip to main content
Log in

Market segmentation, performance differences and strategic orientation - the case of German reinsurers

  • Abhandlung
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft

Abstract

We apply the concept of strategic groups to the German reinsurance market. We use a cluster analysis to subdivide reinsurance companies into strategic groups and analyze the effect of a set of strategic choice variables on their performance. Furthermore, we examine the impact of the financial crisis of 2008 on the reinsurance sector. Our dataset encompasses 142 firm-year observations for the years 2004 until 2012. Our results indicate the existence of three strategic groups in the German reinsurance market. Moreover, we find that most strategic choice variables that characterize the individual strategic groups affect the reinsurers’ level of performance. Finally, we find that the reinsurers’ performance increased in the aftermath of the financial crisis. This holds in particular for professional reinsurance companies.

Zusammenfassung

Wir analysieren strategische Gruppen im deutschen Rückversicherungsmarkt. Wir verwenden eine Clusteranalyse, um Rückversicherungsunternehmen in strategische Gruppen zu unterteilen. Anschließend untersuchen wir den Einfluss von Faktoren, welche die Strategie der Unternehmen charakterisieren, auf deren Performance. Unser Datensatz umfasst 142 Firmenjahr-Beobachtungen der Jahre 2004 bis 2012. Unsere Analyse weist auf die Existenz von drei strategischen Gruppen im deutschen Rückversicherungsmarkt hin. Des Weiteren zeigen unsere Ergebnisse, dass Faktoren, welche die Strategie der Unternehmen charakterisieren, auch deren Performance signifikant beeinflussen. Zudem deuten unsere Ergebnisse auf einen Anstieg der Performance der Rückversicherer im Anschluss an die Finanzkrise hin. Dies gilt insbesondere für professionelle Rückversicherer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Companies within one strategic group are assumed to have the same characteristics with respect to strategic orientation, assets, technologies or competency (Aaker and McLoughlin 2010).

  2. Reinsurance originating from German reinsurance firms accounted for 28.4 % of the world reinsurance premiums in 2010, making Germany the leading host country in the reinsurance market since the 1980s (Outreville 2012).

  3. Since our study only captures reinsurers that write premiums in Germany, we eliminate Hannover Rück SE from our dataset, as the German business is run by its subsidiary E + S Rückversicherung AG.

  4. Variable definitions are provided in Table 2.

  5. A more precise measure of the reinsurer’s degree of internationalization would include its premiums written abroad. However, this information is not available in our data set.

  6. These techniques include underwriting policy, diversification, limit systems, retrocessions and accumulation control.

  7. Outreville (2012) shows that Munich Re is also the global market leader in the worldwide reinsurance market since the 1980s.

References

  • Aaker, D.A., McLoughlin, D.: Strategic market management—global perspectives, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Adiel, R.: Reinsurance and the management of regulatory ratios and taxes in the property–casualty insurance industry. J. Acc. Econ. 22, 207–240 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuntas, M., Gößmann, G.: The Relationship Between Home Market Performance and Internationalization Decisions: Evidence from German Insurance Groups, Risk Management and Insurance Review (Forthcoming) (2015)

  • Altuntas, M., Rauch, J., Wende, S.: Strategic Group Performance and Dynamics under Different Economic Conditions, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance (Forthcoming) (2015)

  • Anderson, E.: The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis. Mark. Sci. 4, 234–254 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., Schmittlein, D.C.: Integration of the sales force: an empirical examination. Rand J. Econ. 15, 385–395 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baluch, F., Mutenga, S., Parsons, C.: Insurance, systematic risk and the financial crisis. Geneva Pap. Risk Ins. 36, 126–163 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.G., Ofek, E.: Diversification’s effect on firm value. J. Finance 37(1), 39–65 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C.: Risk Sharing and Pricing in the Reinsurance Market. In: Dionne G (ed.) Handbook of insurance, pp. 603–626. Springer, New York (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berry-Stölzle, T.R., Altuntas, M.: A resource-based perspective on business strategies of newly founded subsidiaries: the case of German Pensionsfonds. Risk Manag. Ins. Rev. 13(2), 173–193 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E., Ghemawat, P.: Identifying Mobility Barriers. Strateg. Manag. J. 13(1), 1–12 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E., Porter, M.E.: From entry barriers to mobility barriers: conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quart. J. Econ. 91(2), 241–261 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Hamwi, I.S.: Performance analysis of U.S. property-liability reinsurance companies. J. Risk Ins. 23, 140–152 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, F.J., Easingwood, C.: Multiple channels in services: pro, cons and issues. Serv. Ind. J. 24, 1–29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C.R., McCullough, K.A.: A Reexamination of the corporate demand for reinsurance. J. Risk Ins. 73(1), 169–192 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cool, K., Schendel, D.: Strategic group formation and performance: The Case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963–1982. Manag. Sci. 33, 1102–1124 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.D., Nini, G.: Optimal capital utilization by financial firms: Evidence from the property-liability insurance industry. J. Finan. Services Res. 21, 15–23 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diallo, A., Kim, S.: Asymmetric information, captive insurers’ formation, and managers’ welfare gain. J. Risk Ins. 56(2), 233–251 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, G., Garand, M.: Risk management determinants affecting firms’ values in the gold mining industry: new empirical results. Econ. Letters 79, 43–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easingwood, C., Coelho, F.J.: Single versus multiple channel strategies: typologies and drivers. Serv Ind J. 23, 31–46 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T.D., Deephouse, D.L., Ferguson, W.L.: Do Strategic Groups Differ in Reputation? Strateg. Manag. J. 21, 1195–1214 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiegenbaum, A., Thomas, H.: Strategic groups and performance: the U.S. insurance industry, 1970–84. Strateg. Manag. J. 11, 197–215 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiegenbaum, A., Thomas, H.: Strategic groups as reference groups: theory, modelling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strateg. Manag. J. 16, 461–447 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S., Schendel, D.: Strategic reference point theory. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 219–235 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot, K., Scharfstein, D., Stein, J.: Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate In-vestment and Financing Policies. J. Finance 48, 1629–1658 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate data analysis, 6 th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Weiss, L.: Firm Size and Profitability. Rev. Econ. Statist. 49, 319–331 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K.R.: An application of clustering for strategic group analysis. Strateg. Manag. J. 6, 55–73 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S.: The financial crisis, systemic risk, and the future of insurance regulation. J. Risk Ins. 76(4), 785–819 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Hoskisson, R.E.: Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization. West Publishing, St. Paul, MN (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M.: Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960–1970, Doctoral Dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D.J., Shook, C.L.: The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strateg. Manag. J. 17(6), 441–458 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D.J., Thomas, J.B., Snow, C.C.: Organizational configurations and performance: a comparison of theoretical approaches. Acad Manage J. 36(6), 1278–1313 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leask, G., Parker, D.: Strategic groups, competitive groups and performance within the u.k. pharmaceutical industry: improving our understanding of the competitive process. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 723–745 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, A.P., Sommer, D.W.: Effects of corporate diversification: evidence from the property-liability insurance industry. J. Risk Ins. 75(4), 893–919 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, M.: Profitability and size of firm. Rev. Econ. Statist. 51, 104–107 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, B., Aaker, D.A.: Mobility barriers and strategic groups. Strateg. Manag. J. 10, 475–485 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, D., Smith, C.W.: Contractual provisions, organizational structure, and conflict control in insurance markets. J. Bus. 54, 407–434 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A.: Resource and market based determinants of performance in the u.s. banking industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 17(4), 307–322 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Sharfman, M.P.: Industry, variety and performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 14(3), 163–177 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outreville, J.F.: A note on geographical diversification and performance of the world’s largest reinsurance groups. Multinatl. Bus. Rev. 20(4), 376–391 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S.C., Xie, X.: Reinsurance and systemic risk: the impact of reinsurer downgrading on property-casualty insurers. J. Risk Ins. 81(3), 587–621 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.: The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Rev. Econ. Statist. 61, 214–227 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.: Competitive strategy. Free Press, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J., Wende, S.: Solvency prediction for property-liability insurance companies: evidence from the financial crisis. Geneva Pap. Risk Ins. 40, 47–65 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R.K., Palmer, T.B.: Managerial categorization of competitors: using old maps to navigate new environments. Org. Sci. 7, 22–39 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M.: Industrial market structure and economic performance, 2 nd edn. Rand McNally, Chicago (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scordis, N.A., Porat, M.: Captive insurance companies and manager-owner conflicts. J. Risk Ins. 65(2), 289–302 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R.: Rethinking risk management. J Appl. Corp. Fin. 9(3), 8–24 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammed Altuntas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altuntas, M., Bernhardt, C. & Rauch, J. Market segmentation, performance differences and strategic orientation - the case of German reinsurers. ZVersWiss 105, 51–67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-016-0330-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-016-0330-5

Keywords

Navigation