Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Total Leukocyte Counts and the Requirement of Dose Reduction due to Cytopenias as Prognostic Indicators Affecting Response to Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is considered the first line of non stem cell transplantation treatment for patients diagnosed with CML. We evaluated the response rates and adverse reactions to Imatinib in our patients and tried to identify factors which affected the response to Imatinib. Eighty-four patients were diagnosed on the basis of clinical and haematological variables with confirmation by FISH, detecting Philadelphia chromosome or bcr-abl translocation and were then started on oral capsule Imatinib. A complete haematological response was seen in 78.04% patients, while complete cytogenetic response (CCR) was seen in 12.2% of patients and major cytogenetic response (MCR) was seen in 64.63% of patients. It was found that that a greater total leukocyte count (TLC) on presentation had a negative correlation with cytogenetic response. Cytopenias were seen in 36 patients (43.82%). 34.9% of patients having CCR/MCR required dose reduction while 73.6% of patients not achieving CCR/MCR required dose reduction. This was a significant difference, confirmed on statistical analysis (P < 0.05; P = 0.019), establishing the negative prognostic value of dose reduction due to cytopenias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA et al (2003) Imatinib compared with interferon and low dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. NEJM 348:994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cervantes F, Hernandez-Boluda JC, Steegman JL et al (2003) Imatinib mesylate therapy of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia resistant or intolerant to interferon: results and prognostic factors for response and progression free survival in 150 patients. Haematologica 88:1117–1122

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kantarjian H, Sawyers C, Hochhaus A et al (2002) Hematologic and cytogenetic responses to imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia. NEJM 346:645

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marin D, Marktel S, Bua M et al (2003) Prognostic factors for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib mesylate after failure of interferon alfa. Leukemia 17:1448–1453

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Lemos JAR, de Oliveira CM, Scerni ACC et al (2005) Differential Molecular Responses of the transcripts B2A2 and B3A2 to imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia. Genet Mol Res 4(4):803–811

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arora B, Kumar L, Kumari M et al (2005) Therapy with imatinib mesylate for chronic myeloid leukemia. Ind J Med Pediatric Oncol 26(2):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deshmukh C, Saikia T, Bakshi A et al (2005) Imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective, single arm, non randomized study. JAPI 53:291–295

    Google Scholar 

  8. Usman M, Syed NN, Kakepoto GN et al (2007) Chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: response of imatinab mesylate and significance of sokal score, age and duration in predicting the haematological and cytogenetic response. J Assoc Physician India 55:103–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anant Ramaswamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tripathi, A.K., Kumar, A. & Ramaswamy, A. Total Leukocyte Counts and the Requirement of Dose Reduction due to Cytopenias as Prognostic Indicators Affecting Response to Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 27, 7–13 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-010-0048-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-010-0048-9

Keywords

Navigation