Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lessons from the experience of OECD nations on macroeconomic growth and economic freedom, 2004–2008

International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the impact on per capita real economic growth of each of the ten measures of economic freedom computed annually by the Heritage Foundation. Within the context of the Random Effects Model, panel least squares estimations using a 5-year panel (2004 through 2008) dataset for the OECD nations as a group reveal that the percentage growth rate in the purchasing-power-parity adjusted per capita real GDP for OECD nations was, at the 5 % statistical significance level or better, an increasing function of at least seven of the ten economic freedom measures. The results underscore the critical role that economic freedom plays in a nation’s economic growth and prosperity and the importance of pursuing policies that are consistent with increasing economic freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. OECD membership grew by four nations to 34 in 2010.

References

  • Abrams BA, Schmitz MD (1978) The ‘Crowding Out’ effect of government transfers on private charitable contributions. Public Choice 33(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali A (1997) Economic freedom, democracy and growth. J Private Enterp 13(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Crain WM (2001) Political regimes, economic freedom, institutions and growth. J Public Finance Public Choice 19(1):3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Crain WM (2002) Institutional distortions, economic freedom and growth. Cato J 21(3):415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora V, Vamvakidis G (2006) The impact of U.S. economic growth on the rest of the world: how much does it matter? J Econ Integration 21(1):21–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1997) Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson KM, Spencer RW (1975) Crowding out and its critics. Louis Rev 60(12):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula RJ (1978) An empirical analysis of the crowding out of fiscal policy in the United States and Canada. Kyklos 31(3):424–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebula RJ (1995) The Impact of federal government budget deficits on economic growth in the U.S.: an empirical investigation, 1955–1992. Int Rev Econ Finance 4(3):245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H (2009) A literature review on the relationship between foreign trade and economic growth. Int J Econ Finance 1(1):127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JR, Lawson RA (2008) The impact of economic growth, tax policy, and economic freedom on income inequality. J Private Enterp 24(1):23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole JH (2003) “The contribution of economic freedom to world economic growth,” 1980–99. Cato J 23(2):189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Contessi S (2008) Net exports’ recent (and surprising) contribution to GDP growth. Louis Rev 93(11):1

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA, Scadding JL (1974) Private savings: ultrarationality, aggregation, and Denison’s law. J Polit Econ 82(2):225–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JW (1998) Institutions, investment, and growth: new cross-country and panel data evidence. Econ Inq 36(4):603–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JW (2003) Causality in the freedom-growth relationship. Eur J Polit Econ 19(3):479–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan J, Siermann CLJ (1998) Further evidence on the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. Public Choice 95(3–4):363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan J, Sturm J (2000) On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. Eur J Polit Econ 16(2):215–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube S (2009) Foreign direct investment and electricity consumption on economic growth: evidence from South Africa. Int Econ 62(2):175–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith AA (1995) Democracy, property rights and economic growth. J Dev Stud 32(2):157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guseh JS (1997) Government size and growth in developing countries: a political-economy framework. J Macroecon 19(1):175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney J, Lawson RA (2004) Economic freedom of the world: 2004 annual report. http://freetheworld.com/. Accessed 2 Mar 2009

  • Gwartney J, Lawson RA (2005) Economic freedom of the world: 2005 annual report. http://freetheworld.com/. Accessed 2 Mar 2009

  • Gwartney J, Lawson RA (2006) Economic freedom of the world: 2006 annual report. http://freetheworld.com/. Accessed 2 Mar 2009

  • Gwartney J, Lawson RA (2007) Economic freedom of the world: 2007 annual report. http://freetheworld.com/. Accessed 2 Mar 2009

  • Gwartney J, Lawson RA (2008) Economic freedom of the world: 2008 annual report. http://freetheworld.com/. Accessed 2 Mar 2009

  • Gwartney J, Holcombe R, Lawson RA (2006) Institutions and the impact of investment on growth. Kyklos 59(2):255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechelman JC, Stroup MD (2000) Which economic freedoms contribute to economic growth? Kyklos 53(4):527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Foundation (2009) Economic freedom indices. http://www.heritage.org/Index/Explore.aspx. Accessed 24 Mar 2010

  • Heritage Foundation (2011) Promoting economic opportunity and prosperity. http://www.heritage.org/index/PDF/2009/Index2009_Chapter1_pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2011

  • International Monetary Fund (2008) Economic growth data. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/02/weodata/weoselser.aspx?c=512%. Accessed 2 Feb 2009

  • International Monetary Fund (2009) Economic growth data. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/weodata/weoselser.aspx?c=512%. Accessed 26 Nov 2011

  • Norton SW (1998) Poverty, property rights, and human well-being: a cross-national study. Cato J 18(2):233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009a) The crisis and beyond. http://www.oecd.org/document/57/0,3443,en_21571361_41723666_42942201_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

  • OECD (2009b) For a better world economy. http://www.oecd.org/document/24/0,3343,en_2649_34487_41707672_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

  • OECD (2011) Labor: labor force statistics. http://www.oecd.org/document/13/0,3343,en_2649_33733_44938317_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 25 Nov 2011

  • Ogbokor CA (2005) Time-series evidence for the export-led paradigm: a case study of Zimbabwe. J Soc Sci 1(2):77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Osnos E (2010) Boom Doctor. The New Yorker, October, 11:42–51

  • Renas SM, Cebula RJ (2005) Enron, herding, and the deterrence effect of disclosure of improprieties. Am J Econ Sociol 64(3):743–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Methuen & Co., Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortensson J (1994) Property rights and economic growth: an empirical study. Kyklos 47(2):231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard J. Cebula.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cebula, R.J., Clark, J.R. Lessons from the experience of OECD nations on macroeconomic growth and economic freedom, 2004–2008. Int Rev Econ 59, 231–243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-012-0162-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-012-0162-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation