Abstract
Validation is the process establishing the suitability of an analytical method for a particular purpose. Various guidelines defining statistical procedures for validation of chemical, bio-chemical, pharmaceutical, and molecular methods have been developed, and ad hoc validation metrics (indices and test statistics) are available and routinely used, for in-house and interlaboratory testing and decision making. However, there is no universally accepted practice for assay validation, and often, subjectivity plays an important role in the interpretation of validation studies’ results. Instead, the key to rational validation studies relies upon the formalization and harmonization of procedures for their design and interpretation of results. Fuzzy-based techniques can be helpful in such respect. Fuzzy logic allows summarizing the information obtained by classic independent validation statistics into one synthetic index of overall method performance. The possibility of having a comprehensive indicator of method performance has the advantage of permitting direct method comparison, facilitating the evaluation of many individual, possibly contradictory metrics. The objectives of this paper are to illustrate the advantages that a fuzzy-based aggregation method could bring into the validation of analytical methods and to propose its application for the evaluation of methods’ performance. Validation metrics are compared for practical examples of assessment of method performance in collaborative studies. Fuzzy logic-based rules are shown to be applicable to improve insights into method quality and interpretation of results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acutis M, Trevisiol P, Confalonieri R, Bellocchi G, Grazioli E, Van den Eede G, Paoletti C (2007) J AOAC Int 90:1432
Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Plant Mol Biol Reporter 9:208
Balls M, Fentem JH (1997) ATLA 25:33
Bellocchi G, Acutis M, Fila G, Donatelli M (2002) Agron J 94:1222
Bouchon-Meunier B (1995) La logique floue. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, p 128
CBER (2000) Draft guidance for industry. Analytical procedures and methods validation. FDA, Bethesda, MD
Donatelli M, Acutis M, Nemes A, Wösten H (2004) In: Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ (eds) Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 363–390
FAO–WHO (2005) Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex committee of methods of analysis and sampling: consideration of the methods for the detection and identification of foods derived from biotechnology. General approach and criteria for the methods. FAO, Rome, p 16
Green JM (1996) Anal Chem 68:305
Hall LO, Kandel A (1991) In: Kandel A (ed) Fuzzy expert theory. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 3–21
Holden JM et al (2005) J Food Comp Anal 18:829
Holst-Jansen A, Ronning SB, Lovseth A, Berdal KG (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 375:985
Horwitz W (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:331
ICH (1995) Validation of analytical procedures; Q2A. ICH, Geneva (60 Federal Register 11259–11262)
ICH (1997) Validation of analytical procedures: methodology. Q2B. ICH, Geneva (62 Federal Register 27463–27467)
ISO 5725 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurements methods and results. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (parts 1–6)
ISO (2007) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (VIM), 3rd edn. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
IUPAC (1988) Pure Appl Chem 60:856
IUPAC (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:331
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 569
Klir GJ, Clair UH St, Yuan B (1997) Fuzzy set theory: foundations and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p 574
Krech AB, Wurz A, Stemmer C, Feix G, Grasser KD (1999) Gene 234:45
Limentani GB, Ringo MC, Ye F, Bergquist ML, McSorley EO (2005) Anal Chem 77:221
Mazzara M, Foti N, Price S, Paoletti C, Van den Eede G (2005) Event-specific method for the quantitation of maize line TC1507 using real-time PCR-validation report and protocol-sampling and DNA extraction of M TC15O7. EUR 21828 EN, ISBN 92-79-00109-4, Catalogue no. LB-NA-21828-EN-C
Mazzara M, Grazioli E, Price S, Larcher S, Savini C, Van den Eede G (2006) Event-specific method for the quantitation of maize line DAS-59122-7 using real-time PCR-Validation report and protocol. EUR 22133 EN, ISBN 92-79-01535-4, Catalogue no. LB-NA-22133-EN-C
Muire-Sluis A (2004) Update on regulatory and industry perspective on the design and optimization of immunogenicity assays. Presented at Biological Assay Development and Validation, San Diego, CA
Plant RE, Stone ND (1991) Knowledge-based systems in agriculture. McGraw-Hill, New York (pp 364)
Regulation (EC) no. 1829/2003 (2003) of the European Parliament and Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Union 18.10.2003 L268, 01-23
Regulation (EC) no. 641/2004 (2004) of 6 April 2004 on detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) no. 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the application for the authorization of new genetically modified food and feed, the notification of existing products and adventitious or technically unavoidable presence of genetically modified material which has benefited from a favourable risk evaluation. Official Journal of the European Union 07.04.2004 L102:14–25
Rivington M, Bellocchi G, Matthews KB, Buchan K (2005) Agric Forest Meteorol 135:228
Sugeno M (1985) Inf Sci 36:59
Thompson M, Wood R (1993) Pure Appl Chem 65:2123
Thompson M, Wood R (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:49
Thompson M, Ellison S, Fajgelj A, Willetts P, Wood R (1999) Pure Appl Chem 71:337
Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2002) Pure Appl Chem 74:835
USP (2003) Validation of compendial methods. USPharmacopoeia Convention, Rockville, MD (pp 2149)
WHO (1980) Requirements for kits for immunoassay and other protein binding systems. Document number WHO/BS/80.1270/HRP/80.1. World Health Organization, Geneva
Zadeh LA (1965) Inf Control 8:338
Acknowledgment
The Authors acknowledge Pioneer Hi-Bred International for having developed, optimized, and submitted to the CRL-GMFF—according to the requirements of Reg. (EC) No. 1829/2003 and Reg. (EC) No. 641/2004—the event-specific methods for quantitative detection of maize lines TC1507 and DAS59122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bellocchi, G., Acutis, M., Paoletti, C. et al. Expanding Horizons in the Validation of GMO Analytical Methods: Fuzzy-based Expert Systems. Food Anal. Methods 1, 126–135 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-008-9021-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-008-9021-8