Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisational support: an empirical investigation into the effect of organisational support on the success of emerging market sourcing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

“Global Sourcing” has received a great deal of attention recently, as companies strive for new sources of competitive advantage in the face of increasing global competition. Alongside the undisputed role that supplier management plays in assuring sourcing success, organisational aspects can also be shown to play an important part in the field of global sourcing. This paper is a first systematic attempt to identify the factors that can successfully promote the execution of sourcing projects in “emerging markets”. The success factors are derived from the literature of related areas of research. The analysis adopts an internal perspective, although external factors residing in the relationship with the supplier and the external environment are indirectly taken into account by incorporating research on project and innovation management—both very flexible approaches for highly uncertain environments. The findings allow the identification of clearly relevant success factors in sourcing from emerging markets and are integrated in a model designed to explain the impact of organisational support in this venture. The partial least squares method (PLS) is used to test the model on a set of 96 cases. The data originates from a survey of sourcing managers from Europe, mainly in the manufacturing and automotive industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Straube F et al (2007) International procurement in emerging markets: discovering the drivers of sourcing success. Deutscher Verkehrsverlag, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moller MM, Johansen J, Boer H (2003) Managing buyer–supplier relationships and inter-organisational competence development. Integr Manuf Syst 14(4):369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lay G, Eggers (2004) Ausblick: transnationale Netzwerke bewerten und controllen-die zukünftige Herausforderung. In: Erfolgsfaktor Standortplanung : in-und ausländische Standorte richtig bewerten; mit 40 Tabellen. Springer, Berlin [u.a.]

  4. Arnold U (1997) Beschaffungsmanagement. 2., überarb. und erw. Aufl ed. Sammlung Poeschel; 139. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. XV, 290 S

  5. Bagchi PK, Skjoett-Larsen T (2005) Supply chain integration: a European survey. Int J Logist Manage 16(2):275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer M (1993) Marketing und neuere ökonomische Theorie: Ansätze zu einer Systematisierung. Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis 45(4):444–470

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frear CR, Metcalf LE, Alguire MS (1992) Offshore sourcing: its nature and scope. Int J Purch Mater Manage 28(3):2–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Monczka RM, Giunipero LC (1985) International purchasing: characteristics and implementation. Int Exec (pre–1986) 27(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Min H, Galle WP (1991) International purchasing strategies of multinational US firms. Int J Purch Mater Manage 27(3):9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birou LM, Fawcett SE (1993) International purchasing: benefits, requirements, and challenges. Int J Purch Mater Manage 29(2):27

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alguire MS, Frear CR, Metcalf LE (1994) An examination of the determinants of global sourcing strategy. J Bus Ind Mark 9(2):62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajagopal S, Bernard KN (1994) Global procurement: motivations and strategy. Mark Intell Plann 12(9):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold U (1999) Organization of global sourcing: ways towards an optimal degree of centralization. Eur J Purch Supply Manage 5(3–4):167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter JR, Pearson JN, Peng L (1997) Logistics barriers to international operations: the case of the People’s Republic of China. J Bus Logist 18(2):129–145

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samli AC, Browning JM (2002) Overcoming the barriers to global sourcing: a strategic and expansionistic orientation. American Marketing Association. Conference proceedings. 13(2002 AMA Educators’ proceedings): 331–339

  16. Kiedaisch I (1997) Internationale Kunden-Lieferanten-Beziehungen. Determinanten, Steuerungsmechanismen, Beziehungsqualität. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellram L (1993) Total cost of ownership: elements and implementation. Int J Purch Mater Manage 29(4):3

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monczka RM, Callahan TJ, Nichols EL Jr (1995) Predictors of relationships among buying and supplying firms. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 25(10):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaufmann L (2001) Internationales Beschaffungsmanagement : Gestaltung strategischer Gesamtsysteme und Management einzelner Transaktionen. 1. Aufl ed. Neue betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung; 288. Wiesbaden: Dt. Univ.-Verl. [u.a.]. XXIII, 437 S

  20. Altekar RV (2004) Managing supply chain in Indian manufacturing sector: a critical study with special reference to supplier partnership. South Asian J Manage 11(2):48

    Google Scholar 

  21. Giunipero LC (1990) Motivating and monitoring JIT supplier performance. J Purch Mater Manage 26(3):19

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bozarth C, Handfield R, Das A (1998) Stages of global sourcing strategy evolution: a exploratory study. J Oper Manage 16(2,3):241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Samli AC, Browning JM, Busbia C (1998) The status of global sourcing as a critical tool of strategic planning: opportunistic versus strategic dichotomy. J Bus Res 43(3):177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Monczka RM, Trent RJ (1991) Global sourcing: a development approach. Int J Purch Mater Manage 27(2):2

    Google Scholar 

  25. Monczka RM, Trent RJ (1992) Worldwide sourcing: assessment and execution. Int J Purch Mater Manage 28(4):9

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trent RJ, Monczka RM (2003) International purchasing and global sourcing—what are the differences? J Supply Chain Manage 39(4):26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Quintens L, Pauwels P, Matthyssens P (2006) Global purchasing: state of the art and research directions. J Purch Supply Manage 12(4):170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Werner H (1997) Relationales Beschaffungsverhalten: Ausprägungen und Determinanten. Neue betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung; 215. Wiesbaden: Gabler. XVI, 241 S

  29. SMI (2005) Global spend: Europäische Strategien für Low Cost Country Sourcing

  30. Balachandra R (2004) Outsourcing R&D. Working paper 04-005, Northeastern University, Boston

  31. Rajeev S, Narendar S (2005) Coping with customs clearance uncertainties in global sourcing. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 35(3/4):278

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fagan ML (1991) A Guide to global sourcing. J Bus Strategy 12(2):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Birou LM, Fawcett SE (1993) International purchasing: benefits, requirements, and challenges. Int J Purch Mater Manage. 29(2):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  34. Trent RJ, Monczka RM (1994) Effective cross-functional sourcing teams: critical success factors. Int J Purch Mater Manage 30(4):3

    Google Scholar 

  35. Trent RJ (1998) Individual and collective team effort: a vital part of sourcing team success. Int J Purch Mater Manage 34(4):46–54

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pinto JK, Slevin DP (1987) Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Trans Eng Manage EM34(1):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boutellier R, Gassmann O, Voit E (2002) Projektmanagement in der Beschaffung : Zusammenarbeit von Einkauf und Entwicklung. 2. Aufl. ed. Pocket-Power Einkauf und Logistik; 102. München;Wien: Hanser. 122 S

  38. Zenger W (1991) Führen durch Zielvereinbarungen-Einkaufs-Controlling: Einsatz aller Instrumente. in Beschaffung Aktuell. pp 34–38

  39. Lechler TG (1997) Erfolgsfaktoren des Projektmanagements. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pinto JK, Slevin DP (1988) Critical success factors across the project life cycle. Proj Manage J 19(3):67

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fortune J, White D (2006) Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. Int J Proj Manage 24(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ernst H (2002) Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. Int J Manage Rev 4(1):1–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Quintens L, Pauwels P, Matthyssens P (2006) Global purchasing: state of the art and research directions. J Purch Supply Manage 12(4):170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wolf J (2005) Organisation, Management, Unternehmensführung : Theorien und Kritik. 2., aktualisierte Aufl ed., Wiesbaden: Gabler. XXII, 490 S

  45. Simon HA (1957) A Study of Decision-making Processes in administrative organisations. In: Simon HA (ed) The Free Press, New York

  46. Weber M (1972) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft : Grundriss einer verstehenden Soziologie. 5. rev. Aufl. ed., Tübingen. XXXIII, 942 S

  47. Jex SM (2002) Organizational Psychology: a scientist—practitioner approach. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. Simons TL (1999) Behavioral integrity as a critical ingredient for transformational leadership. J Organ Change Manage 12(2):89–104

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Peters LH, O’Connor EJ (1980) Situational constraints and work outcomes: the influences of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of management. Acad Manage Rev 5(3):391

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bacharach SB, Bamberger P (1995) Beyond situational constraints: job resources inadequacy and individual performance at work. Hum Resou Manage Rev 5(2):79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management—an empirical study. Int J Proj Manage 20(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Swailes S (2002) Organizational commitment: a critique of the construct and measures. Int J Manage Rev 4(2):155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lechler T (2000) When it comes to project management, it’s the people that matter. An empirical analysis of project management in Germany. In: Rolf Lundin FH (ed) Projects as business constituents and guiding motives. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers RM (1982) Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  55. Meyer JP, Becker TE, Vandenberghe C (2004) Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative mode. lnt J Appl Psychol 89(6):991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Quinones MA, Ford JK, Teachout MS (1995) The relationship between work experience and job performance: a conceptional and meta-analytic review. Pers Psychol 48(4):887–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tesluk PE, Jacobs RR (1998) Toward an integrated model o work experience. Pers Psychol 51(2):321–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wageman R (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Adm Sci Q 40(2):145–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Agarwal NC (1998) Reward systems: emerging trends and issues. Can Psychol 39(2):60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Gemünden HG, Salomo S (2005) The influence of project autonomy on project success. Int J Proj Manage 23(5):366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Dvir D, Lechler T (2004) Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success. Res Policy 33(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Larson PD, Poist RF (2004) Improving response rate to mail surveys: a research note. Transp J 43(4):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kotzab H (2005) The role and importance of survey research in the field of supply chain management. In: Kotzab H et al (eds) Research methodologies in supply chain management. Springer, Berlin, pp 125–137

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Grant DB, Teller C, Teller W (2005) Web-based surveys in logistics research: an empirical application. In: Kotzab H et al (eds) Research methodologies in supply chain management. Springer, Berlin, pp 139–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Esposito Vinzi V et al (2007) Capturing and treating unobserved heterogeneity by response based segmentation in PLS path modeling: a comparison of alternative methods by computational experiments. Dr; 07019. Cergy-Pontoise: ESSEC. 5

  66. Government, U.S. (1997) Naic/Sic Code: United States Manual. 2nd edn, Claitors Pub Div. 656

  67. Chin WW, Newsted PR (1999) Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In: Hoyle R (ed) Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage Publications, London, pp 307

  68. Herrmann A, Huber F, Kressnann F (2006) Varianz- und kovarianzbasierte Strukturgleichungsmodelle – Ein Leitfaden zu deren Spezifikation, Schätzung und Beurteilung. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, (02): pp 34

  69. Bagozzi RP, Baumgartner H (1994) The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing. In: Bagozzi RP (ed) Principles of marketing research. Blackwell, Cambridge, p 386

    Google Scholar 

  70. Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics applied probability and statistics. Wiley, New York, p 182

    Google Scholar 

  71. Fassot G (2006) Operationalisierung latenter Variablen in Strukturgleichungsmodellen: Eine Standortbestimmung. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschafltiche Forschung (zfbf) 58(Feb.):67–88

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manage J 20(2):195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Peter JP (1979) Reliability: a review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. J Mark Res 16(1):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ringle CM (2004) Gütemaße für den Partial-least-squares-Ansatz zur Bestimmung von Kausalmodellen. Industrielles Management; 16. Hamburg: Univ. Hamburg, Inst. für Industriebetriebslehre und Organisation, Arbeitsbereich Industrielles Management. 21

  76. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, p 316

    Google Scholar 

  77. Backhaus K, Backhaus E, Plinke W (2003) Multivariate Analysemethoden : eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. 10., neu bearb. und erw. Aufl ed. Springer-Lehrbuch. Berlin [u.a.]: Springer. XI, 818 S

  78. Krafft M, Liehr-Gobbers K, Götz O (2005) Die Validierung von Strukturgleichungsmodellen mit Hilfe des Partial-Least-Suqares (PLS)-Verfahrens. In: Bliemel F et al (eds) Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung: Methode, Anwendung, Praxisbeispiele. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ringle CR et al (2006) Messung von Kausalmodellen mit dem Partial-Least-Squares-Verfahren. Das Wirtschaftsstudium (WISU) 35(1):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wolff G, Herrmann M, Niggemann M (2004) Quo vadis Erfolgsfaktorenforschung? Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, vol 224. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart, p 266

    Google Scholar 

  81. Bortz J, Döring N (2002) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation : für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler; mit 70 Tabellen. 3., überarb. Aufl. ed. Springer-Lehrbuch. Berlin [u.a.]: Springer. XV, 812 S

  82. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14(8):396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Podasakoff PM et al (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Bereich Logistik, H90, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    Thomas Beckmann, Philipp Lindemann & Frank Straube

Authors
  1. Thomas Beckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philipp Lindemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Straube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Beckmann.

Appendix

Appendix

Figures 11, 12

Fig. 11
figure 11

Results of the literature review

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Results of the literature review (continued)

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckmann, T., Lindemann, P. & Straube, F. Organisational support: an empirical investigation into the effect of organisational support on the success of emerging market sourcing. Logist. Res. 1, 27–43 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-009-0010-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-009-0010-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation