Skip to main content
Log in

Bioenergy Traits of Ten Switchgrass Populations Grown in the Northeastern/Mid-Atlantic USA

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) has emerged as a bioenergy crop throughout the midwestern and southern USA, little evaluation has been conducted on the performance of switchgrass as a bioenergy crop in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic. The objectives of this study were to evaluate biomass characteristics of ten switchgrass populations grown in New Jersey and to determine which populations are best for use in biomass production. Ten populations of switchgrass were planted in a spaced-plant nursery in Freehold, NJ and evaluated for: winter injury, anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum navitas, lodging, tiller density, height, heading and anthesis date, and biomass yield as well as cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, ash, chlorine, calcium, magnesium, phosphorous, and potassium in 2007 and 2008. Eastern upland populations 9064202 (Cape May Plant Materials Center accession #9064202), High Tide, and Carthage showed the least amount of winter injury, while southern lowland populations Alamo and Cimarron showed the most winter injury. Lowland populations were less susceptible to anthracnose than upland ecotypes and were taller and later maturing with higher cellulose contents. Lowland populations NSL, Cimarron, and Timber showed the least amount of lodging, and upland populations had the highest tiller densities. Lowland populations Cimarron and Timber had the highest biomass yields of 906.9 and 803.6 kg dry matter plant−1, respectively. Lignocellulosic and mineral contents did not differ greatly among cultivars and generally did not show trends with respect to cytotype. Timber, an eastern lowland ecotype, exhibited the best combination of characteristics and is a promising population for biomass production in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic region of the USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

ADF:

Acid detergent fiber

NDF:

Neutral detergent fiber

References

  1. Berdahl JD, Frank AB, Krupinsky JM, Carr PM, Hanson JD, Johnson HA (2005) Biomass yield, phenology, and survival of diverse switchgrass cultivars and experimental strains in western North Dakota. Agron J 97:549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstrom, G (2010) Plant pathogens of feedstock crops as a source of useful enzymes for lignocellulosic conversion In: Northeast Sun Grant Regional Conference Biographies and Abstracts, Syracuse NY, 24–26 May

  3. Bhandari HS, Saha MC, Mascia PN, Fasoula VA, Bouton JH (2010) Variation among half-sib families and heritability for biomass yield and other traits in lowland switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Crop Sci 50:2355–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boe A (2007) Variation between two switchgrass cultivars for components of vegetative and seed biomass. Crop Sci 47:636–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Casler MD (2005) Ecotypic variation among switchgrass populations from the Northern USA. Crop Sci 45:388–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Casler MD, Boe AR (2003) Cultivar × environment interactions in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:2226–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Casler MD, Buxton DR, Vogel KP (2002) Genetic modification of lignin concentration affects fitness of perennial herbaceous plants. Theor Appl Genet 104:127–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Casler MD, Stendal CA, Kapich L, Vogel KP (2007) Genetic diversity, plant adaptation regions, and gene pools for switchgrass. Crop Sci 47:2261–2273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Casler MD, Vogel KP, Taliaferro CM, Ehlke NJ, Berdahl JD, Brummer EC et al (2007) Latitudinal and longitudinal adaptation of switchgrass populations. Crop Sci 47:2249–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Casler MD, Vogel KP, Taliaferro CM, Wynia RL (2004) Latitudinal adaptation of switchgrass populations. Crop Sci 44:293–303

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cassida KA, Muir JP, Hussey MA, Read JC, Vento BC, Ocumpaugh WR (2005) Biomass yield and stand characteristics of switchgrass in South Central U.S. environments. Crop Sci 45:673–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cassida KA, Muir JP, Hussey MA, Read JC, Vento BC, Ocumpaugh WR (2005) Biofuel component concentrations and yields of switchgrass in South Central U.S. environments. Crop Sci 45:682–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christian DG, Riche AB, Yates NE (2002) The yield and composition of switchgrass and coastal panic grass grown as a biofuel in Southern England. Bioresour Technol 83:115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cortese LM, Honig J, Miller C, Bonos SA (2010) Genetic diversity of twelve switchgrass populations using molecular and morphological markers. BioEnergy Res 3:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Crouch JA, Beirn LA, Cortese LM, Bonos SA, Clarke BB (2009) Anthracnose disease of switchgrass caused by the novel fungal species Colletotrichum navitas. Mycol Res 13:1411–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Das MK, Fuentes RG, Taliaferro CM (2004) Genetic variability and trait relationships in switchgrass. Crop Sci 44:443–448

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dien BS, Jung HJG, Vogel KP, Casler MD, Lamb JFS, Iten L et al (2006) Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg 30:880–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Nashaar HM, Banowetz GM, Griffith SM, Casler MD, Vogel KP (2009) Genotypic variability in mineral composition of switchgrass. Bioresour Technol 100:1809–1814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fike JH, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Balasko JA, Green JT Jr, Monroe Rasnake M et al (2006) Long-term yield potential of switchgrass-for-biofuel systems. Biomass Bioenerg 30:198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fike JH, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Balasko JA, Green JT Jr, Monroe Rasnake M et al (2006) Switchgrass production for the upper southeastern USA: influence of cultivar and cutting frequency on biomass yields. Biomass Bioenerg 30:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuentes RG, Taliaferro CM (2002) Biomass yield stability of switchgrass cultivars. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, pp 276–282

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gírio FM, Fonseca C, Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Marques S, Bogel-Lukasik R (2010) Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4775–4800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gravert CE, Tiffany LH, Munkvold GP (2000) Outbreak of smut caused by Tilletia maclagani on cultivated switchgrass in Iowa. Plant Dis 84:596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gunter LE, Tuskan GA, Wullschleger SD (1996) Diversity among populations of switchgrass based on RAPD markers. Crop Sci 36:1017–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gustafson DM, Boe A, Jin Y (2003) Genetic variation for Puccinia emaculata infection in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:755–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hopkins AA, Vogel KP, Moore KJ, Johnson KD, Carlson IT (1995) Genotype variability and genotype x environment interactions among switchgrass accessions from the Midwestern. USA Crop Sci 5:565–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hultquist SJ, Vogel KP, Lee DK, Arumuganathan K, Kaeppler S (1996) Chloroplast DNA and nuclear DNA content variations among cultivars of switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L. Crop Sci 36:1049–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jakob K, Zhou F, Patterson AH (2009) Genetic improvement of C4 grasses as cellulosic biofuel feedstocks. Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 45:291–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. King BC, Waxman KD, Nenni NV, Walker LP, Bergstrom GC, Gibson DM (2011) Arsenal of plant cell wall degrading enzymes reflects host preference among plant pathogenic fungi. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lemus R, Brummer EC, Moore KJ, Molstad NE, Burras CL, Barker MF (2002) Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa. USA Biomass Bioenerg 23:433–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lemus R, Brummer EC, Burras CL, Moore KJ, Barker MF, Molstad N (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in large fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa. USA Biomass Bioenerg 32:1187–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lemus R, Parrish DJ, Abaye O (2008) Nitrogen-use dynamics in switchgrass grown for biomass. BioEnergy Res 1:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lemus R, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD (2009) Nutrient uptake by ‘Alamo’ switchgrass used as an energy crop. BioEnergy Res 2:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lewandowski I, Kicherer A (1997) Combustion quality of biomass: practical relevance and experiments to modify the biomass quality of Miscanthus × giganteus. Eur J Agron 6:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Cristou M (2003) The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenerg 25:335–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Madakaze IC, Stewart K, Peterson PR, Coulman BE, Samson R, Smith SL (1998) Light interception, use-efficiency and energy yield of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) grown in a short season area. Biomass Bioenerg 15:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McLaughlin SB, Bouton JH, Bransby DI, Conger BV, Ocumpaugh WR, Parrish D et al (1999) Developing switchgrass as a bioenergy crop. In: Janick J (ed) Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, pp 282–299

    Google Scholar 

  38. Missaoui AM, Fasoula VA, Bouton JH (2005) The effect of low plant density on response to selection for biomass production in switchgrass. Euphytica 142:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Missaoui AM, Paterson AH, Bouton JH (2006) Molecular markers for the classification of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) germplasm and to assess genetic diversity in three synthetic switchgrass populations. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1291–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mitchell R, Vogel KP, Sarath G (2008) Managing and enhancing switchgrass as a bioenergy feedstock. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 2:530–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Muir JP, Sanderson MA, Ocumpaugh WR, Jones RM, Reed RL (2001) Biomass production of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass in response to nitrogen, phosphorous, and row spacing. Agron J 93:896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Narasimhamoorthy B, Saha MC, Swaller T, Bouton JH (2008) Genetic diversity in switchgrass collections assessed by EST-SSR markers. BioEnergy Res 1:136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ogden CA, Eleleji KE, Johnson KD, Wang Q (2009) In-field direct combustion fuel property changes of switchgrass harvested from summer to fall. Fuel Process Tech 91:266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Parrish DJ, Fike JH (2005) The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:423–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Parrish DJ, Fike JH (2009) Selecting, establishing, and managing switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) for biofuels. In: Mielenz JR (ed) Biofuels: methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology, vol 581. Humana Press, New York, pp 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sanderson MA, Reed RL, McLaughlin SB, Wullschleger SD, Conger BV, Parrish DJ et al (1996) Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop. Bioresour Technol 56:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sanderson MA, Reed RL, Ocumpaugh WR, Hussey MA, Van Esbroek G, Read JC et al (1999) Switchgrass cultivars and germplasm for biomass feedstock in Texas. Bioresour Technol 67:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. SAS Institute Inc (2004) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sharma N, Piscioneri I, Pignatelli V (2003) An evaluation of biomass yield stability of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) cultivars. Energ Convers Manage 44:2953–2958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Thomason WE, Raun WR, Johnson GV, Taliaferro CM, Freeman KW, Wynn KJ et al (2004) Switchgrass response to harvest frequency and time and rate of applied nitrogen. J Plant Nutr 27:1199–1226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vogel KP (2004) Switchgrass. In: Moser LE, Burson BL, Sollenberger LE (eds) Warm-season (C4) grasses. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 561–588

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vogel KP, Brejda JJ, Walters DT, Buxton DR (2002) Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: harvest and nitrogen management. Agron J 94:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vogel KP, Jung HJG (2001) Genetic modification of herbaceous plants for feed and fuel. Critical Rev Plant Sci 20:15–49

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang Y, Zalapa J, Jakubowski AR, Price DL, Acharya A, Wei Y et al (2011) Natural hybrids and gene flow between upland and lowland switchgrass. Crop Sci 51:2626–2641

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Chris Miller and Charles Taliaferro for providing seed, and Eric Weibel, Robert Shortell, Matthew Koch, and Matthew Mattia for assistance with data collection. Funding for this research was provided by the Rutgers Center for Turfgrass Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura M. Cortese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortese, L.M., Bonos, S.A. Bioenergy Traits of Ten Switchgrass Populations Grown in the Northeastern/Mid-Atlantic USA. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 580–590 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9271-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9271-6

Keywords

Navigation