Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Importance of gated CT acquisition for the quantitative improvement of the gated PET/CT in moving phantom

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of gated PET/CT and CT attenuation correction (AC) for the quantitation of radioactivity.

Methods

An ellipse phantom containing six spheres, ranging from 10 to 37 mm in diameter, was filled with 36.7 kBq/mL of F-18. The respiratory motion was simulated by a motor-driven plastic platform to move the phantom with a displacement of 2 cm in the craniocaudal direction at a frequency of 15/min. With the phantom at rest, PET/CT data were acquired and used as a standard (nonmotion). With the phantom in motion, PET data were acquired in both the static and gated modes (sPET and gPET, respectively). Helical CT (HCT), slow CT (SCT), average CT (ACT), and four-dimensional CT (4DCT) were acquired and used to correct attenuation. On both PET and CT images, the maximum radioactivity, dimensions, and CT numbers were measured on the central slices.

Results

In nonmotion, recovery coefficients whose spheres were 22 mm or smaller gradually decreased. Regarding motion, the PET counts of the spheres in the static acquisition were lower than those acquired in nonmotion with either type of CTAC (sPET–HCT: −43.8%, sPET–SCT: −51.4%, sPET–ACT: −49.5%). Gated acquisition of PET significantly improved the PET counts (gPET–HCT: −30.1%) (p < 0.05), while additional gated acquisition of CT significantly improved them further (gPET–4DCT: −15.2%) (p < 0.01). The dimensions of sPET were overestimated, but those of gPET were close to the standard values. The SCT significantly overestimated the dimensions, and the water density area decreased (p < 0.01). The 4DCT images were similar to the HCT images.

Conclusions

In respiratory motion, PET acquisition in the static mode underestimated the radioactivity and overestimated the dimensions. Neither SCT nor ACT improved these errors. Although PET acquisition in the gated mode improved the quantification of PET/CT images, the additional gated CT acquisition using 4DCT is required for further improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber WA, Figlin R. Monitoring cancer treatment with PET/CT: does it make a difference? J Nucl Med. 2007;48:36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goerres GW, Kamel E, Heidelberg TN, Schwitter MR, Burger C, von Schulthess GK. PET–CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:351–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall LT, Wahl RN. PET–CT: accuracy of PET and CT spatial registration of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:721–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Pan T, Pevsner A, Rosenzweig KE, Mageras G, et al. The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1287–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lagerwaard FJ, Van Sornsen de Koste JR, Nijssen-Visser MR, Schuchhard-Schipper RH, Oei SS, Munne A, et al. Multiple “slow” CT scans for incorporating lung tumor mobility in radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:932–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nye JA, Esteves F, Votaw JR. Minimizing artifacts resulting from respiratory and cardiac motion by optimization of the transmission scan in cardiac PET/CT. Med Phys. 2007;34:1901–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chi PC, Mawlawi O, Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Balter PA, Luo D, et al. Design of respiratory averaged CT for attenuation correction if the PET data from PET/CT. Med Phys. 2007;34:2039–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, Rosenzweig KE, Squire OD, Braban LE, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on reducing lung motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer. Med Phys. 2002;29:366–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Pan T, Yorke E, Mageras GS, Rosenzweig KE, et al. Quantitation of respiratory motion during 4D-PET/CT acquisition. Med Phys. 2004;31:1333–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan T, Lee TY, Rietzel E, Chen GT. 4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multi-slice CT. Med Phys. 2004;31:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pevsner A, Nehmeh SA, Humm JL, Mageras GS, Erdi YE. Effect of motion on tracer activity determination in CT attenuation corrected PET images: a lung phantom study. Med Phys. 2005;32:2358–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okubo M, Nishimura Y, Nakamatsu K, Okumura M, Shibata T, Kanamori S, et al. Static and moving phantom studies for radiation treatment planning in a positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) system. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:579–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vines DC, Keller H, Hoisak JDP, Breen SL. Quantitative PET comparing gated with nongated acquisitions using a NEMA phantom with respiratory-simulated motion. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35:246–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagel CC, Bosmans G, Dekker AL, Ollers MC, Ruysscher DK, Lambin P, et al. Phased attenuation correction in respiratory correlated computed tomography/positron emitted tomography. Med Phys. 2006;33:1840–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Hirofumi Kawakami (GE Healthcare Japan) and Mr. Naoyuki Tamamura (Nihon MediPhysics) for their technological assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Radiological Science, Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Y. Sakaguchi, T. Mitsumoto, T. Zhang & M. Sasaki

  2. Radiological Science Course, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    K. Mitsumoto & Y. Tachiya

  3. Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

    N. Ohya

Authors
  1. Y. Sakaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Mitsumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Mitsumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Y. Tachiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. N. Ohya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Sasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sasaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakaguchi, Y., Mitsumoto, T., Zhang, T. et al. Importance of gated CT acquisition for the quantitative improvement of the gated PET/CT in moving phantom. Ann Nucl Med 24, 507–514 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-010-0388-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-010-0388-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation