Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

College Students’ Life Priorities: The Influence of Gender and Gender-linked Personality Traits

  • Articles
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined relations between gender-linked personality traits (i.e., agency and communion) and life goals in a sample of 237 undergraduates. In addition, gender similarities and differences in the relative importance of life goals were explored. As predicted, agency was positively associated with the importance of most achievement goals such as having a career, whereas communion and unmitigated communion were positively associated with the importance of relational goals such as romantic partnership. Contrary to predictions, results suggested that men were more willing than women to sacrifice some achievement goals for a romantic relationship. Findings point to the potential influence of gender and gender-linked personality traits on the establishment of life priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abele, A. E. (2000). A dual impact model of gender and career related processes. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aukett, R., Ritchie, J., & Mill, K. (1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baber, K. M., & Monaghan, P. (1988). College women’s career and motherhood expectations: New options, old dilemmas. Sex Roles, 19, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berkman, L. F., & Breslow, L. (1983). Health and ways of living: The Alameda County study. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruch, M. A. (2002). The relevance of mitigated and unmitigated agency and communion for depression vulnerabilities and dysphoria. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burda, P. C., Vaux, A., & Schill, T. (1984). Social support resources: Variation across sex and sex role. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Danoff-Burg, S., Mosher, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2006). Relations of agentic and communal personality traits to health behavior and substance use among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fritz, H. L. (2000). Gender-linked personality traits predict mental health and functional status following a first coronary event. Health Psychology, 19, 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fritz, H. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: Self-neglect and overinvolvement with others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Green, R. J., & Hill, J. H. (2003). Sex and higher education: Do men and women attend college for different reasons? College Student Journal, 37, 557–563.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greene, A. L., & Wheatley, S. M. (1992). ‘I’ve got a lot to do and I don’t think I’ll have the time’: Gender differences in late adolescents’ narratives of the future. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 667–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hammersla, J. F., & Frease-McMahan, L. (1990). University students’ priorities: Life goals vs. relationships. Sex Roles, 23, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helgeson, V. S. (1993). Implications of agency and communion for patient and spouse adjustment to a first coronary event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 807–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Helgeson, V. S. (1995). Masculinity, men’s roles, and coronary heart disease. In D. F. Sabo & D. F. Gordon (Eds.), Men’s health and illness: Gender, power, and the body. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1996). Implications of unmitigated communion and communion for adolescent adjustment to type I diabetes. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 2, 163–188.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: Distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 131–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50, 711–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaufman, G. (2005). Gender role attitudes and college students’ work and family expectations. Gender Issues, 22, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerpelman, J. L., & Schvaneveldt, P. L. (1999). Young adults’ anticipated identity importance of career, marital, and parental roles: Comparisons of men and women with different role balance orientations. Sex Roles, 41, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Litwak, E., & Messeri, P. (1989). Organizational theory, social supports, and mortality rates: A theoretical convergence. American Sociological Review, 54, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Livingston, M. M., Burley, K., & Springer, T. P. (1996). The importance of being feminine: Gender, sex role, occupational and marital role commitment, and their relationship to anticipated work-family conflict. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McAdams, D. P., Jackson, R. J., & Kirshnit, C. (1984). Looking, laughing, and smiling in dyads as a function of intimacy motivation and reciprocity. Journal of Personality, 52, 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mongrain, M., & Zuroff, D. C. (1995). Motivational and affective correlates of dependency and self-criticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mosher, C. E., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2005). Agentic and communal personality traits: Relations to attitudes toward sex and sexual experiences. Sex Roles, 52, 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Novack, L. L., & Novack, D. R. (1996). Being female in the eighties and nineties: Conflicts between new opportunities and traditional expectations among white, middle class, heterosexual college women. Sex Roles, 35, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Orlofsky, J. L., & O’Heron, C. A. (1987). Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations: Implications for personal adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1034–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and men in love: Sex differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. E. O’Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1981). Loving and leaving: Sex differences in romantic attachments. Sex Roles, 7, 821–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saragovi, C., Aubé, J., Koestner, R., & Zuroff, D. (2002). Traits, motives, and depressive styles as reflections of agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., Di Dio, L., & Aubé, J. (1997). Agency, communion, and well-being: Extending Helgeson’s (1994) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schroeder, K. A., Blood, L. L., & Maluso, D. (1993). Gender differences and similarities between male and female undergraduate students regarding expectations for career and family roles. College Student Journal, 27, 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shulman, S., & Scharf, M. (2000). Adolescent romantic behaviors and perceptions: Age- and gender-related differences, and links with family and peer relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the ‘Romantic Beliefs Scale’ and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Thorn, B. L., & Gilbert, L. A. (1998). Antecedents of work and family role expectations of college men. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Willinger, B. (1993). Resistance and change: College men’s attitudes toward family and work in the 1980s. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family: Research on men and masculinity series (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    Catherine Mosher

  2. University of Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, USA

    Sharon Danoff-Burg

Authors
  1. Catherine Mosher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon Danoff-Burg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Mosher.

Additional information

Catherine Mosher is a doctoral candidate in clinical psychology at the University at Albany, SUNY and a health psychology intern at Duke University Medical Center. She earned her master’s degree in clinical psychology from the University at Albany, SUNY.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mosher, C., Danoff-Burg, S. College Students’ Life Priorities: The Influence of Gender and Gender-linked Personality Traits. Gend. Issues 24, 21–33 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-007-9002-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-007-9002-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation