Abstract
Benefits to females of short-term mating have recently been identified, and it has been suggested that women have evolved adaptations for this strategy. One piece of evidence supporting such a female adaptation would be that women find the experience of a one-night stand as affectively positive as men. Individuals (N = 1,743) who had experienced a one-night stand were asked to rate aspects of their “morning after” feelings (six positive and six negative). Women were significantly more negative and less positive than men. Although women did not especially view these relationships as a prelude to long-term relationships, they felt greater regret than men about having been “used.” Extra-pair copulations were rated more negatively, but not less positively, than singles’ experiences. There was no interaction between gender and mated status on positivity or negativity. Although, in terms of subsequent affective response, women do not seem well adapted to casual sexual encounters, it may be important to distinguish impelling sexual motivation preceding intercourse from later evaluations of the event. Menstrual cycle changes may also be important in altering the strength and target of sexual motivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Data collection took place during the Christmas and New Year holidays. In the UK, this period is associated with hedonistic excess, but so too is the summer vacation period. The extent to which similar results might be found, for example, after southern European holidays is unknown.
The qualitative analysis proceeded as follows: Some comments were wholly positive or negative in tone, but comments that contained both positive and negative evaluations were disaggregated. Each evaluation was then categorized as positive or negative by two researchers blind to the sex and relationship status of respondent, κ = 0.85.
I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for these suggestions.
References
Allen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 12, 101–130.
Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., & Matthews, D. (2002). Adaptationism: how to carry out an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 489–504.
Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–63.
Beach, S. R. H., Jouriles, E. N., & O’Leary, D. K. (1985). Extramarital sex: impact on depression and commitment in couples seeking marital therapy. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 11, 99–108.
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.
Bleske, A. L., & Buss, D. M. (2000). A comprehensive theory of human mating must explain between-sex and within-sex differences in mating strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 593–594.
Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships: II. A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217–233.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Chisholm, J. F. (1999). Attachment and time preference: relations between early stress and sexual behavior in a sample of American university women. Human Nature, 10, 51–83.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution and behavior. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
de Graaf, H., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2004). Gender differences in affective response to sexual rejection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 395–403.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88.
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partners’ mate retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 269, 975–982.
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation. In D. M. Buss (Ed.) Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 344–371). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Geary, D. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Glass, S. P. (2003). Not “just friends”: Protect your relationship from infidelity and heal the trauma of betrayal. New York: Free Press.
Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1985). Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1101–1120.
Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: the association between attitudes, behaviours, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 361–387.
Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation and relationship status: is she dressed to impress? Journal of Sex Research, 41, 66–74.
Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The affective shift hypothesis: the functions of emotional changes following sexual intercourse. Personal Relationships, 8, 357–369.
Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21–64.
Johnston, V. S. (2003). The origin and function of pleasure. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 167–179.
Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969.
Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116.
Krug, R., Pietrowsky, R., Fehm, H. L., & Born, J. (1994). Selective influence of menstrual cycle on perception of stimuli of reproductive significance. Psychosomatic Medicine, 56, 410–417.
Krug, R., Plihal, W., Fehm, H. L., & Born, J. (2000). Selective influence of the menstrual cycle on perception of stimuli with reproductive significance: an event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 37, 111–122.
Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–96.
Meyerling, R. A., & Epling-McWherter, E. A. (1986). Decision-making in extramarital relationships. Lifestyles, 8, 115–129.
Mikach, S. M., & Bailey, J. M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 141–50.
Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.
Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: a qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.
Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of desire: the association between menstrual cycle phases and female sexual desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 145–156.
Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303.
Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. London: Penguin.
Scheib, J. E. (2001). Context-specific mate choice criteria: women’s trade-offs in the context of long-term and extra-pair mateships. Personal Relationships, 8, 371–389.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005a). Fundamental strategies of human mating. In D. M. Buss (Ed.) Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005b). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allick, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., Bennett, K. L., et al. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.
Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8, 425–455.
Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., LaMunyon, C. W., Quintus, B. J., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2004). Sex differences in sexual psychology produce sex similar preferences for a short-term mate. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 405–412.
Shackelford, T. K., Pound, N., & Goetz, A. T. (2005). Psychological and physiological adaptations to sperm competition in humans. Review of General Psychology, 9, 228–248.
Slob, A. K., Bax, C. M., Hop, W. C., Rowland, D. L., & van der Werflen Bosch, J. J. (1996). Sexual arousability and the menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 21, 545–558.
Smuts, B. B. (1985). Sex and friendship in baboons. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Spanier, G. B., & Margolis, R. L. (1983). Marital separation and extramarital sexual behaviour. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 23–48.
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481.
Surbey, M. K., & Conohan, C. D. (2000). Willingness to engage in casual sex: the role of parental qualities and perceived risk of aggression. Human Nature, 11, 367–386.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and human sexual behaviour. Psychological Science, 5, 297–302.
Townsend, J. M. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement: an evolutionary interpretation of sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 171–204.
Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., & Wasserman, T. H. (1995). Low-investment copulation: sex differences in motivations and emotional reactions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 25–51.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.) Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 139–179). New York: Aldine.
Udry, J., & Billy, J. (1987). Initiation of coitus in early adolescence. American Sociological Review, 52, 841–855.
Wiederman, M. W., & Dubois, S. L. (1998). Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates: evidence from a policy capturing study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 153–170.
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Woodward, K., & Richards, M. H. (2005). The parental investment model and minimum mate choice criteria in humans. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 57–61.
Wright, T. M., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Personality and unrestricted sexual behaviour: correlations of sociosexuality in Caucasian and Asian college students. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 166–192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, A. The Morning after the Night Before. Hum Nat 19, 157–173 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2