Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A decision support system-based procedure for evaluation and monitoring of protected areas sustainability for the Mediterranean region

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Despite common acknowledgement of the value of protected areas as instruments in ensuring sustainability, and their promotion for the achievement of policies on halting the loss of biodiversity, there is no common approach today for monitoring and evaluating them. This paper presents a novel integrated nature conservation management procedure developed to monitor and evaluate the sustainability of Mediterranean protected areas. This procedure was successfully implemented and formally evaluated by protected area managers in six Mediterranean countries, results of which are presented here together with an overview of the web-based Decision Support System (DSS) developed to facilitate its wide adoption. The DSS and procedure has been designed and evaluated by managers as a useful tool, which facilitates and provides needed procedural guidance for protected area monitoring whilst minimizing input requirements to do so. The procedure and DSS were developed following a review of existing protected area assessment tools and a detailed primary investigation of the needs and capacity of its intended users. Essentially, the procedure and DSS guides provide the facilities for protected area managers, in following a participatory approach to develop a context-specific sustainability monitoring strategy, for their protected area. Consequently, the procedure is, by design, participatory, context specific, holistic and relevant to protected area management and institutional procedures. The procedure was piloted and formally evaluated in Greece, Italy, Turkey, Egypt, Malta and Cyprus. Feedback collected from the pilot evaluations is also summarised herein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell S and Morse S 2003 Measuring Sustainability, Learning from Doing; Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit G and Comeau A 2005 A Sustainable Future for the Mediterranean: The Blue Plan’s Environment and Development Outlook; Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertzky M and Stoll-Kleemann S 2009 Multi-level discrepancies with sharing data on protected areas: What we have and what we need for the global village; J. Environ. Manag. 90 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bladt J, Strange N, Abildtrup J, Svenning J C and Skov F 2009 Conservation efficiency of geopolitical coordination in the EU; Journal for Nature Conservation 17(2) 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogliotti C 2006 A conceptual model to frame goals of sustainable development; Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plann. 1(4) 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G 1996 Collaborative management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the approach to the context; IUCN Social Policy Group, Switzerland.

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Kothari A and Oviedo G 2004 Indigenous and Local Communities and Protected Areas: Towards Equity and Enhanced Conservation; IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

  • Collier C 2002 Community Stakeholder Involvement; CIRI-6349A, September, www.safegrounds.com/other_guidance.htm (accessed 19.12.2008).

  • Davidson E J 2005 Evaluation methodology basics, the nuts and bolts of sound evaluation; Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbaere B 2006 European policy review – assessing policy impacts on biodiversity; J. Nat. Conserv. 14(2) 129–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Council 2002 Dialogue for sustainability: Facilitation skills and principles; Environmental Council C1/V1, London.

  • Ervin J 2003 WWF: Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) Methodology; WWF, Gland, Switzerland.

  • Gross N 2006 Beyond expertise: Ecological science and the making of robust restoration strategies; J. Nat. Conserv. 14(3–4) 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardi P and Zdan T 1997 Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles in Practice; IISD, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M 2003 Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas; Bioscience 53(9) 823–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S and Dudley N 2004 Management effectiveness: Assessing management of protected areas? J. Environ. Pol. Plann. 6(2) 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N and Courrau J 2006 Evaluating effectiveness: A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas; 2nd edn, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

  • IEMA (Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment) 2002 Perspectives, guidelines on participation in environmental decision making; IEMA, Lincoln.

  • IUCN 1994 Guidelines for Protected Areas Management Categories; IUCN, Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland.

  • Mitchell G 1996 Problems and fundamentals of sustainable development indicators; Sustainable Development 4 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson D M and Dinerstein E 1998 The Global 200: A representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions; Conserv. Biol. 12(8) 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens S and Cowel R 2002 Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process; Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace F and Di Terlizzi B (eds) 2008 Planning and Sustainable Management of Coastal Zones and High Environmental Value Areas. Final Networks’ Meeting and Seminar Proceedings, Bari, Italy, 17–18 December 2007, IAM Bari, Italy.

  • Patton M Q 1997 Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text; 3rd edn, Thousand Oaks, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pediaditi K, Wehrmeyer W and Burningham K 2007 Evaluating the sustainability of Brownfield redevelopment projects; In: Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration, livable places from problem spaces (eds) Dixon T, Raco M, Cartney P and Lerner D (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing) pp. 141–163.

  • Posavac E J and Carey R G 2007 Program Evaluations: Methods and Case Studies, 7th edn, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotheroo N, Mohon S and King B 1997 Do the indicators of sustainable development produced by the UK government and indicators developed within various local agenda 21 initiatives have common characteristics from which core indicators can be developed?, Proceedings International Development Res. Conf., Manchester, JRP Environment.

  • Rydin Y, Holman Y, Hands V and Sommer F 2003 Incorporating sustainable development concerns into an urban regeneration project: How politics can defeat procedures; J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 46(4) 545–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff H 2000 Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning; John Wiley and Sons, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven M 1991 Evaluation thesaurus; 4th edn, Sage, Newbury Park: CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalock R L 2001 Outcome-based Evaluation; 2nd edn, Kluwer Academic Press/Plenum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam D L and Shinkfield A J 2007 Evaluation theory, models and applications; Jossey-Bass, CA.

  • Sutherland W J, Pullin A S, Dolman P M and Knight T M 2004 The need for evidence-based conservation; Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19 305–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W J, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth P R, Brereton T, Brickland J, Campbell C D, Chamberlain D E, Cooke A I, Dulvy N K, Dusic N R, Fitton M, Freckleton R P, Godfray H C, Grout N, Harvey H J, Hedley C, Hopkins J J, Kift N B, Kirby J, Kunin W E, MacDonald D W, Markee B, Naura M, Neale A R, Oliver T, Osborn D, Pullin A S, Shardlow M E A, Showler D A, Smith P L, Smithers R J, Solandt J-L, Spencer J, Spray C J, Thomas C D, Thompson J, Webb S E, Yalden D W and Watkinson A R 2006 The identification of one hundred ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK; J. Appl. Ecol. 43 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L and Middleton J 2003 Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas; IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

  • Thorsell J W 1982 Evaluating effective management in protected areas: An application to Arusha National Park; Tanzamia, IUCN Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas, Gland, Switzerland.

  • UNEP 1996 Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean; Monaco.

  • Ukaga O 2001 Participatory valuation of sustainable development; Greener Management International 36 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K PEDIADITI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PEDIADITI, K., BUONO, F., POMPIGNA, F. et al. A decision support system-based procedure for evaluation and monitoring of protected areas sustainability for the Mediterranean region. J Earth Syst Sci 120, 949–961 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0120-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0120-3

Keywords

Navigation