Abstract
In this study, the applicability of a “fed-batch” strategy, that is, sequential loading of substrate or substrate plus enzymes during enzymatic hydrolysis was evaluated for hydrolysis of steam-pretreated barley straw. The specific aims were to achieve hydrolysis of high substrate levels, low viscosity during hydrolysis, and high glucose concentrations. An enzyme system comprising Celluclast and Novozyme 188, a commercial cellulase product derived from Trichoderma reesei and a β-glucosidase derived from Aspergillus niger, respectively, was used for the enzymatic hydrolysis. The highest final glucose concentration, 78 g/l, after 72 h of reaction, was obtained with an initial, full substrate loading of 15% dry matter weight/weight (w/w DM). Conversely, the glucose yields, in grams per gram of DM, were highest at lower substrate concentrations, with the highest glucose yield being 0.53 g/g DM for the reaction with a substrate loading of 5% w/w DM after 72 h. The reactions subjected to gradual loading of substrate or substrate plus enzymes to increase the substrate levels from 5 to 15% w/w DM, consistently provided lower concentrations of glucose after 72 h of reaction; however, the initial rates of conversion varied in the different reactions. Rapid cellulose degradation was accompanied by rapid decreases in viscosity before addition of extra substrate, but when extra substrate or substrate plus enzymes were added, the viscosities of the slurries increased and the hydrolytic efficiencies decreased temporarily.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dien, B. S., Bothast, R. J., Nichols, N. N., & Cotta, M. A. (2002). International Sugar Journal, 104(1241), 204–211.
Robertson, G. H., Wong, D. W. S., Lee, C. C., Wagschal, K., Smith, M. R., & Orts, W. J. (2006). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 353–365.
Sun, Y., & Cheng, J. (2002) Bioresource Technology, 83, 1–11.
Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y. Y., Holzapple, M., et al. (2005). Bioresource Technology, 96, 673–686.
Varga, E., Klinke, H. B., Réczey, K., & Thomsen, A. B. (2004). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 88(5), 567–574.
Thompson, D. N., & Chen, H.-C. (1992). Bioresource Technology, 39, 155–163.
Sheehan, J., & Himmel, M. E. (1999). Biotechnology Progress, 15, 817–827.
Wooley, R., Ruth, M., Glassner, D., & Sheehan, J. (1999). Biotechnology Progress, 15, 794–803.
Thomas, K. C., & Ingledew, W. M. (1992). Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 10, 61–68.
Palonen, H., Tjerneld, F., Zacchi, G., & Tenkanen, M. (2004). Journal of Biotechnology, 107, 65–72.
Eriksson, T., Karlsson, J., & Tjerneld, F. (2002). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 101, 41–59.
Sluiter, A. (2005). Laboratory Analytical Procedure 002. Retrieved from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html#LAP-002.
Adey, B., & Baker, J. (1996). Laboratory Analytical Procedure 006. Retrieved from http://devafdc.nrel.gov/pdfs/4689.pdf.
Rosgaard, L., Pedersen, S., Cherry, J. R., Harris, P., & Meyer, A. S. (2006). Biotechnology Progress, 22, 493–498.
Linde, M., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2006). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 129–132, 546–562.
Tengborg, C., Galbe M., & Zacchi, G. (2001). Biotechnology Progress, 17, 110–117.
Yang, B., Willies, D. M., & Wyman, C. E. (2006). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 94, 1122–1128.
Berlin, A., Balakshin, M., Gilkes, N., Kadla, J., Maximenko, V., Kubo, S., et al. (2006). Journal of Biotechnology, 125, 198–209.
Mes-Hartree, M., & Saddler, J. N. (1983). Biotechnology Letters, 5, 531–536.
Pimenova, N. V., & Hanley, T. R. (2004). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 113–116, 347–360.
Allen, D. G., & Robinson, C. W. (1990). Chemical Engineering Science, 45(1), 37–48.
Barnes, H. A., & Nguyen, Q. D. (2001). Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 98, 1–14.
Svihla, C. K., Dronawat, S. N., Donnelly, J. A., Rieth, T. C., & Hanley, T. R. (1997). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 63–5, 375–385.
Brookfield Engineering Lab. Inc. Retrieved from http://www.can-am.net/suppliers/brookfield/more_solutions.pdf.
Takahashi, T., & Sakata, T. (2002). Journal of Nutrition, 132(5), 1026–1030.
Houchin, T. L., & Hanley, T. R. (2004). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 113, 723–732.
Rudolf, A., Alkasrawi, M., Zacchi, G., & Lidén, G. (2005). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 37, 195–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosgaard, L., Andric, P., Dam-Johansen, K. et al. Effects of Substrate Loading on Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Viscosity of Pretreated Barley Straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 143, 27–40 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-0028-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-0028-1