Skip to main content
Log in

Preference-oriented form design: application to cars’ headlights

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The integration of customer preferences is nowadays a challenge in new product development. In this paper, we describe a method which integrates the customer preferences for the design of geometrical forms. We illustrate the approach by the design of a car’s headlight. From a product space, the method is based on the definition of a perceptual space, built by multidimensional scaling, and which lead to the definition of interpretable perceptual dimensions. Objective measures of the form, computed from the design variables of the design model, are selected to interpret the perceptual dimensions. These measures are representative of the overall form and of the curvature variations. At this level, the Fourier coefficients of a closed curve are used to represent the information on the curvature variations. Next, from the preferences of a customer, the target values of the selected measures corresponding to a preference optimum are calculated. We show in the paper the interest of this approach for the design of forms. The method is illustrated by the design of a car’s headlight, modeled by Bezier curves and integrated in a front-end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloch, P.: Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. J. Mark. 56(3), 16–29

  2. Hsiao S.W.: Concurrent design method for developing a new product. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 29, 41–55 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagamachi M.: Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 15, 3–11 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshida, S., Aoyama, H.: Basic study on trend prediction for style design. In: DETC2008-49574. 2008 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Brooklyn, New York, USA (2008)

  5. Lewis, K., Chen, W., Schmidt, L. (eds): Decision Making in Engineering Design. ASME Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orsborn, S., Cagan, J., Boatwright, P.: Quantifying aesthetics form preference in a utility function. In: 2008 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Brooklyn, New York, USA (2008)

  7. Kelly, J., Papalambros, P., Wakefield, G.: The development of a tool for the preference assessment of the visual aesthetics of an object using interactive genetic algorithms. In: 9th Generative Art Conference GA 2005 (2005)

  8. Yannou, B., Dihlmann, M., Awedikian, R.: Evolutive design of car silhouettes. In: DETC2008-49439. 2008 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Brooklyn, New York, USA (2008)

  9. Aoyama H., Nordgren A., Yamaguchi H., Komatsu Y., Ohno M.: Digital style design systems from concept to sophisticated shape. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 1(2), 55–65 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheutet V., Léon J.-C., Catalano C.E., Giannini F., Monti M., Falcidieno B.: Preserving car stylists’ design intent through an ontology. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2(1), 9–16 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Green P., Carroll J., Goldberg S.: A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis. J. Mark. 43, 17–35 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dagher, A., Petiot, J.-F., Guyon, H.: Elicitation and modeling of customers’ preferences in industrial design: a comparative study on vehicle front end. In: DETC2008-49637. 2008 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Brooklyn, New York, USA (2008)

  13. Swamy, S., Orsborn, S., Michalek, J., Cagan, J.: Measurement of headlight form preference using choice based conjoint analysis. In: DETC2007-35409. 2007 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2007)

  14. Davison M.L.: Multidimensional Scaling. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll J.D, Chang J.-J.: A General index of nonlinear correlation and its application to the problem of relating physical and psychological dimensions. Am. Psychol. 19, 540 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caroll, J.D.: Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In: Shepard, R.N., Romney, A.K., Nerlove, S.B. (eds.) Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Application in the Behavioral Sciences, 1, 105–155 (1972)

  17. McKay M., Conover W., Beckman R.: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21, 239–245 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Shepard, R.N., Romney, K., Nerlove, S.B. (eds): Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, vol. I: Theory. Seminar Press, New York (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhl F.P.: «Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour». Comput. Graph. Image Process. 18, 236–258 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McGarva J., Mullineux G.: Harmonic representation of closed curves. Appl. Math. Model. 17(4), 213–218 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Beauchamp J.W.: Synthesis by spectral amplitude and “brightness” matching of analyzed musical instrument tones. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 30(6), 396–406 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Danzart, M., Siefferman, J., Delarue, J.: New developments in preference mapping techniques: finding out a consumer’s optimal product, its sensory profile and the key sensory attributes. In: 7th Sensometrics Conference, Davis, USA (2004)

  23. Brunswik E.: The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1952)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Petiot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petiot, JF., Dagher, A. Preference-oriented form design: application to cars’ headlights. Int J Interact Des Manuf 5, 17–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-010-0105-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-010-0105-5

Keywords

Navigation