Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does Less Invasive Spine Surgery Result in Increased Radiation Exposure? A Systematic Review

  • Symposium: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Radiation exposure to patients and spine surgeons during spine surgery is expected. The risks of radiation exposure include thyroid cancer, cataracts, and lymphoma. Although imaging techniques facilitate less invasive approaches and improve intraoperative accuracy, they may increase radiation exposure.

Questions/purposes

We performed a systematic review to determine whether (1) radiation exposure differs in open spine procedures compared with less invasive spine procedures; (2) radiation exposure differs in where the surgeon is positioned in relation to the C-arm; and (3) if radiation exposure differs using standard C-arm fluoroscopy or fluoroscopy with computer-assisted navigation.

Methods

A PubMed search was performed from January 1980 to July 2013 for English language articles relating to radiation exposure in spine surgery. Twenty-two relevant articles met inclusion criteria. Level of evidence was assigned on clinical studies. Traditional study quality evaluation of nonclinical studies was not applicable.

Results

There are important risks of radiation exposure in spine surgery to both the surgeon and patient. There is increased radiation exposure in less invasive spine procedures, but the use of protective barriers decreases radiation exposure. Where the surgeon stands in relation to the image source is important. Increasing the distance between the location of the C-arm radiation source and the surgeon, and standing contralateral from the C-arm radiation source, decreases radiation exposure. The use of advanced imaging modalities such as CT or three-dimensional computer-assisted navigation can potentially decrease radiation exposure.

Conclusions

There is increased radiation exposure during less invasive spine surgery, which affects the surgeon, patient, and operating room personnel. Being cognizant of radiation exposure risks, the spine surgeon can potentially minimize radiation risks by optimizing variables such as the use of barriers, knowledge of position, distance from the radiation source, and use of advanced image guidance navigation-assisted technology to minimize radiation exposure. Continued research is important to study the long-term risk of radiation exposure and its relationship to cancer, which remains a major concern and needs further study as the popularity of less invasive spine surgery increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdullah KG, Bishop FS, Lubelski D, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon in lumbar and thoracolumbar fusions with the use of an intraoperative computed tomographic 3-dimensional imaging system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:E1074–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandela JR, Jacob RP, Arreola M, Griglock TM, Bova F, Yang M. Use of CT-based intraoperative spinal navigation: management of radiation exposure to operator, staff, and patients. World Neurosurg. 2013;79:390–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bronsard N, Boli T, Challali M, de Dompsure R, Amoretti N, Padovani B, Bruneton G, Fuchs A, de Peretti F. Comparison between percutaneous and traditional fixation of lumbar spine fracture: intraoperative radiation exposure levels and outcomes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:162–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischetti M. Exposed. Medical imaging delivers big doses of radiation. Sci Am. 2011;304:96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fransen P. Fluoroscopic exposure in modern spinal surgery. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:386–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gebhard FT, Kraus MD, Schneider E, Liener UC, Kinzl L, Arand M. Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2024–2027; discussion 2028.

  7. Giordano BD, Baumhauer JF, Morgan TL, Rechtine GR. Cervical spine imaging using standard C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:1970–1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giordano BD, Baumhauer JF, Morgan TL, Rechtine GR 2nd. Cervical spine imaging using mini-C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to direct and scatter radiation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:399–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giordano BD, Grauer JN, Miller CP, Morgan TL, Rechtine GR 2nd. Radiation exposure issues in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:e69(61–10).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayashi A. Radiation exposure in the OR: is it safe? AAOS Now. 2008. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/dec08/clinical1.asp. Accessed December 1, 2013.

  11. Jones DP, Robertson PA, Lunt B, Jackson SA. Radiation exposure during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1538–1541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim CW, Lee YP, Taylor W, Oygar A, Kim WK. Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine J. 2008;8:584–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraus MD, Krischak G, Keppler P, Gebhard FT, Schuetz UH. Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2419–2429.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kruger R, Faciszewski T. Radiation dose reduction to medical staff during vertebroplasty: a review of techniques and methods to mitigate occupational dose. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1608–1613.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lange J, Karellas A, Street J, Eck JC, Lapinsky A, Connolly PJ, Dipaola CP. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:E306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee K, Lee KM, Park MS, Lee B, Kwon DG, Chung CY. Measurements of surgeons’ exposure to ionizing radiation dose during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:1240–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lester JD, Hsu S, Ahmad CS. Occupational hazards facing orthopedic surgeons. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012;41:132–139.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mariscalco MW, Yamashita T, Steinmetz MP, Krishnaney AA, Lieberman IH, Mroz TE. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during open lumbar microdiscectomy and minimally invasive microdiscectomy: a prospective, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mastrangelo G, Fedeli U, Fadda E, Giovanazzi A, Scoizzato L, Saia B. Increased cancer risk among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital. Occup Med (Lond). 2005;55:498–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCollough CH, Schueler BA. Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys. 2000;27:828–837.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG. Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: ‘how far away is far enough?’ J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:392–398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Klineberg EO, Lieberman IH. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:264–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mroz TE, Yamashita T, Davros WJ, Lieberman IH. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:96–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mulconrey DS. Fluoroscopic radiation exposure in spinal surgery: in vivo evaluation for operating room personnel. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Nov 7 [Epub ahead of print].

  25. Nakashima M, Kondo H, Miura S, Soda M, Hayashi T, Matsuo T, Yamashita S, Sekine I. Incidence of multiple primary cancers in Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors: association with radiation exposure. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:87–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, Williams S, Solomito M. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2637–2645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. New York, NY, USA: International Commission on Radiological Protection; 1990;21.

  28. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Recommendations on Limits for Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 1987:91.

  30. Singer G. Occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:69–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Slomczykowski M, Roberto M, Schneeberger P, Ozdoba C, Vock P. Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:975–982; discussion 983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:532–537.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Synowitz M, Kiwit J. Surgeon’s radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:106–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Occupational gonadal and embryo/fetal doses from fluoroscopically assisted surgical treatments of spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:2573–2580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Basic References. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Available at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref.html. Accessed December 1, 2013.

  36. von Wrangel A, Cederblad A, Rodriguez-Catarino M. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:490–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1780–1784.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang J, Weir V, Fajardo L, Lin J, Hsiung H, Ritenour ER. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system. J Xray Sci Technol. 2009;17:305–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 725 Prior Hall, 376 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Elizabeth Yu MD & Safdar N. Khan MD

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Yu MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Safdar N. Khan MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Yu MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, E., Khan, S.N. Does Less Invasive Spine Surgery Result in Increased Radiation Exposure? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 1738–1748 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3503-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3503-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation