Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In Brief: Cost-effectiveness Analyses in Orthopaedics

  • In Brief
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:388–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozic KJ, Rosenberg AG, Huckman RS, Herndon JH. Economic evaluation in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:129–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brauer CA, Neuman PJ, Rosen AB. Trends in cost effectivenss analyses in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:42–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brauer CA, Rosen AB, Olchanski NV, Neumann PJ. Cost-utility analyses in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1253–1259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Briggs AH, O’Brien BJ. The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ. 2001;10:179–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–1005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ko HH, Weintraub RM, Kuntz RE, Weinstein MC, Baim DS. Economics of elective coronary revascularization: comparison of costs and charges for conventional angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting and bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1052–1059.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Donaldson C, Hundley V, McIntosh E. Using economics alongside clinical trials: why we cannot choose the evaluation technique in advance. Health Econ. 1996;5:267–269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Donaldson C, Shackley P. Economic evaluation. In: Detels R, Holland W, McEwen J, Omenn G, eds. Oxford Textbook of Public Health. Ed 3. Vol 2. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1997:949–971.

  10. Drummond MF, Richardson WS, O’Brien BJ, Levine M, Heyland D. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1997;277:1552–1557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Ed 3. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folland S, Goodman A, Stano M. Economic efficiency and cost-benefit analysis. The Economics of Health and Health Care. Ed 6. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010:64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graves N, Walker D, Raine R, Hutchings A, Roberts JA. Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods. Health Econ. 2002;11:735–739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Halliday RG, Darba J. Cost data assessment in multinational economic evaluations: some theory and review of published studies. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2:149–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunink M, Glasziou P, Siegel J, Weeks J, Pliskin J, Elstein A, Weinstein M. Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuntz K, Weinstein MC. Modelling in economic evaluation. In: Drummond M, McGuire A, eds. Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Merging Theory with Practice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2001:141–171.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neumann PJ, Stone PW, Chapman RH, Sandberg EA, Bell CM. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976–1997. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:964–972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the “dollars” make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation in studies in health care. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:288–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poolman RW, Struijs PA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Marti RK, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Reporting of outcomes in orthopaedic randomized trials: does blinding of outcome assessors matter? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:550–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith RD. Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care: a critical assessment. Health Econ. 2003;12:609–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taira DA, Seto TB, Siegrist R, Cosprove R, Berezin R, Cohen DJ. Comparison of analytic approaches for the economic evaluation of new technologies alongside multicenter clinical trials. Am Heart J. 2003;145:452–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Task Force on Principles for Economic Analysis of Health Care Technology. Economic analysis of health care technology: a report on principles. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 1976;10:129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972;7:118–133.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vavken P, Culen G, Dorotka R. [Clinical applicability of evidence-based orthopedics: a cross-sectional study of the quality of orthopedic evidence][in German]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2008;146:21–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, Frazier HS, Neuhauser D, Neutra RR, McNeil BJ. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:1253–1258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinstein MC, Skinner JA. Comparative effectiveness and health care spending: implications for reform. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:460–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Whynes DK, Frew EJ, Wolstenholme JL. Willingness-to-pay and demand curves: a comparison of results obtained using different elicitation formats. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005;5:369–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilde O. Lady Windermere’s Fan. London, England; 1893.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Enders 1016, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Patrick Vavken MD, MSc

  2. Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Patrick Vavken MD, MSc

  3. Stryker Europe, Fomello, Rome, Italy

    Thomas Bianchi MS

Authors
  1. Patrick Vavken MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Bianchi MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Vavken MD, MSc.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

About this article

Cite this article

Vavken, P., Bianchi, T. In Brief: Cost-effectiveness Analyses in Orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 2395–2398 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1873-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1873-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation