Skip to main content
Log in

Whose forest? Whose land? Whose Ruins? Ethics and conservation

Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stakes are very high in many struggles over cultural property, not only because the property is itself valuable, but also because property rights of many kinds hinge on cultural identity. However, the language of property rights and possession, and the standards for establishing cultural rights, is founded in antiquated and essentialized concepts of cultural continuity and cultural purity. As cultural property and culturally-defined rights become increasingly valuable in the global marketplace, disputes over ownership and management are becoming more and more intense. Using the example of a recent lawsuit over logging on Mayan Indian reservations in the Central American country of Belize, this paper argues that cultural essentialist positions are no longer tenable. Assigning exclusive ownership of globally important resources to any group or entity on purely cultural grounds is likely to prolong conflict instead of creating workable management structures. The author instead advocates a concept of “stakeholding” which acknowledges the legitimate interests of diverse individuals and groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cassell, Joan and Jacobs, Sue-Ellen (1987) Handbook on Ethical Issues in Anthropology, American Anthropological Association, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilk, Richard (1985) The Ancient Maya and the Political Present, Journal of Anthropological Research 41 (3): 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas, Nicholas (1994) Colonialism’s Culture: Anthropology, Travel, and Government, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kahn, Joel (1990) Towards a History of the Critique of Economism: The Nineteenth-Century German Origins of the Ethnographer’s Dilemma, Man 25: 230–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawkins, Richard (1986) The Blind Watchmaker, Longman’s Scientific and Technical, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boas, Franz (1911) The Mind of Primitive Man, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kahn, Joel (1995) Culture, Multiculture, Postculture, Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Latour, Bruno (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wolf, Eric (1982) Europe and the People Without History, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCay, Bonnie and Acheson, James (1987) The Question of the Commons: the Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilk, Richard (1991) Household Ecology: Economic Change and Domestic Life Among the Kekchi Maya of Belize, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Toledo Maya Cultural Council and the Toledo Alcaldes Association (1997) Maya Atlas, North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Sertima, Ivan (1976) They Came Before Columbus, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilk, R.R. Whose forest? Whose land? Whose Ruins? Ethics and conservation. SCI ENG ETHICS 5, 367–374 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0027-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0027-4

Keywords

Navigation