Abstract
The belief that science is “a driver of growth in the knowledge economy” has led in recent decades to increasing encouragement by government of the involvement of industry and of commerce in the sponsorship and direction of research in universities, and to the increasing influence of industrial representatives on advisory panels associated with the publicly funded scientific research councils. By extending the doctrine of commercial confidentiality into university laboratories, inconvenient findings have been suppressed, and both free endeavour and free speech undermined. This has narrowed our scientific horizons and compromised government advisors.
It is argued that scientific freedom is a guarantor of our wider liberties. Science, which tells us who we are and how we can live better, is being distorted so twisting our understanding of the ways in which we might progress, shutting off alternatives to existing models of development. Business now stands as a guard dog at the gates of perception. Only the inquiries which suit its needs are allowed to pass.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of Trade and Industry (July 2000) White Paper. Excellence and Opportunity: a science and innovation policy for the 21 st Century. Stationery Office, London
Office of Science and Technology (1993) White Paper. Realising Our Potential, a strategy for science, engineering and technology. Stationery Office, London.
http://www.foresight.gov.uk/about.html
Taylor, I. (1995) A change for the better? Science & Public Affairs, Autumn.
Department of Trade and Industry, London (1998) White Paper, Our Competitive Future: building the knowledge driven economy. http://www.dti.gov.uk/comp/competitive/wh_intl.htm
e.g. Department of Trade and Industry http://dtiinfo1.dti.gov.uk/ost/forwardlook99/states/hefcdeni/text.htm. May 2000.
The Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the UK, quoted in The Times, 15th December 1998.
Professor Sir Alec Broers, Vice-Chancellor, Cambridge University, 8th November 1999. Quoted in Cambridge University Press Release. Cambridge and MIT: Torchbearers to UK’s Enterprise Future — World’s Top Two Research and Business Giants Join Forces for an International Enterprise Partnership.
Cambridge University, 8th November 1999. Press Release. Cambridge and MIT: Torchbearers to UK’s Enterprise Future — World’s Top Two Research and Business Giants Join Forces for an International Enterprise Partnership.
Greg Muttitt and Chris Grimshaw, 2000. Degrees of Involvement: An examination of the relationship between the upstream oil and gas industry and UK higher education institutions. Published by CorporateWatch.
The Geology and Petroleum Geology Department University of Aberdeen, Department of Geology & Petroleum Geology, ‘Staff directory’, on worldwide website http://www.adbn.ac.uk/geology/staff/staffdir.htm, cited in Greg Muttitt and Chris Grimshaw, as reference 10.
David Whyte, 30th May 1998. Power, Corruption and Lies: the World According to the UK Oil and Gas Industry. Paper presented to the OILC National Conference, Patio Hotel, Aberdeen.
Stelfox, H. et al (8 January 1998) Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists. New England Journal of Medicine 338 (2): 101–106.
Reported in the Daily Telegraph, 14th February 2000.
Action and Information on Sugars, 12th July 2000. Press release: Ribena Tooth Kind Dental Safety Claims “Misleading”.
Action and Information on Sugars, 19th January 2001. Press release: Ribena Misled Customers — Final.
http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk, 21st January 2000.
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, 30 September 1999. Press Release. GM pollen findings are “not new”.
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, 7 June 1999. Press Release. BBSRC regrets destruction of GM crop.
BBSRC staff contract, leaked to GeneWatch and quoted by Norfolk Genetic Information Network, 18 February 1999. Press Release: Scientists gagged on GM foods by public funding body with big links to industry.
Department of Trade and Industry. Foresight for Food and Drink: Alcoholic Drinks http://193.82.159.123/documents/fsze00004/fsze0000410.html. January 2000.
Department of Trade and Industry. Foresight for Food and Drink: Fruit and Vegetables. http://193.82.159.123/documents/fsze00007/fsze000075.html, January 2000.
Department of Trade and Industry. Foresight for Food and Drink: Meat. http://www.foresight.gov.uk. January 2000.
Foresight Programme, Department of Trade and Industry (March 1998) Food Chain Group Report.
Department of Trade and Industry. The Food Chain Group — Shaping the Future of the Food Industry. http://www.foresight.gov.uk. http://poynter.indiana.edu/sas/lb.
Department of Trade and Industry, Winning through Foresight: Action for Food & Drink. http://193.82.159.123/documents/fsze00002/fsze000023.html.
Department of Trade and Industry (January 2000) Progress Through Partnership: 15 — Retail & Distribution. http://193.82.159.123/retail/retail2005.html.
Natural Environment Research Council, 3rd July 2000. Press release: Research Centre To Be Disbanded.
Department of Health (July 1999) White Paper. Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation. Stationery Office, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
More information on the same theme can be found in the author’s book Captive State: the corporate takeover of Britain. September 2000, Macmillan, London.
This paper was presented at the conference “Corruption of Scientific Integrity?—The Commercialisation of Academic Science”, The British Academy, 2 May 2001.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monbiot, G. Guard dogs of perception: The corporate takeover of science. SCI ENG ETHICS 9, 49–57 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0019-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0019-8