Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury

  • Psychiatric Manifestations of Neurologic Disease
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem with neurobehavioral sequelae contributing to the long-term disability that is often associated with the moderate to severe levels of injury. Rehabilitation of cognitive skills is central to encouraging the full participation of the individual in home, vocational, and social roles. The review of available evidence points to four major recommendations for the rehabilitation of cognition following brain injury: 1) Access to subacute rehabilitation that is holistic in nature and involves a multidisciplinary or transdisciplinary team to work in an integrated fashion to support physical, cognitive, and social skill retraining is vital to support positive outcome following TBI. The collaborative effort of these individuals allows for continual reinforcement and evaluation of treatment goals and will often involve the family and/or important others in the individual’s life to prepare for community re-entry. 2) Trials of medication, especially methylphenidate, to assist individuals with significant attention and memory impairment appear well supported by the available evidence. Though some data suggest that the use of cholinesterase inhibitors may be of use for individuals with memory impairments, there is less support for this practice and there are indications that it may worsen the behavioral sequelae of the injury. 3) Randomized controlled trials demonstrate the utility of specific rehabilitation approaches to attention retraining and retraining of executive functioning skills. Future research is needed on rehabilitation techniques in other domains of cognition. 4) Training in the use of supportive devices (either a memory book or more technologically enhanced compensatory devices) to support the individual’s daily activities remains central to the independent function of the individual in the community. Though emerging treatments (eg, virtual reality environments) show relative degrees of promise for inclusion in the rehabilitation of the individual with TBI, these need further evaluation in systematic trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Centers for Disease Control: Traumatic brain injury facts. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/tbi.htm. Accessed May 2010.

  2. Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, et al.: Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Finkelstein E, Corso P, Miller T, et al.: The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Masel B: Conceptualizing Brain Injury as a Chronic Disease. Vienna: Brain Injury Association of America; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katz DI, Ashley MJ, O’Shanick GJ, Connors SH: Cognitive Rehabilitation: The Evidence, Funding and Case for Advocacy for Brain Injury. McLean: Brain Injury Association of America; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. High WM, Sander AM, Struchen MA, et al.: Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarket S, et al.: EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2005, 12:665–680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al.: Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:1681–1692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malec JF, Basford JS: Post-acute brain injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996, 77:198–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parry-Jones BL, Vaughan FL, Miles Cox W: Traumatic brain injury and substance misuse: a systematic review of prevalence and outcomes research (1994-2004). Neuropsychol Rehabil 2006, 16:537–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Writer BW, Schillerstrom JE: Psychopharmacological treatment for cognitive impairment in survivors of traumatic brain injury: a critical review. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009, 21:362–370. This paper reviews the recent evidence supporting the use of various agents to treat the neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. The criteria are based on a large-scale review conducted by Warden and her colleagues in 2005 [18].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stahl SM: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: The Prescriber’s Guide, edn 3rd. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilmott C, Ponsford J: Efficacy of methylphenidate in the rehabilitation of attention following traumatic brain injury: a randomized, crossover, double blind, placebo controlled inpatient trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009, 80:552–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chew E, Zafonte RD: Pharmacological management of neurobehavioral disorders following traumatic brain injury—a state-of-the-art review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009, 46:851–879. This thorough review of all relevant medication trials includes specific, trial-by-trial tables for various aspects of cognition and behavior.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ballesteros J, Guemes I, Ibarra N, et al.: The effectiveness of donepezil for cognitive rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008, 23:171–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tenuovou O, Alin J, Helenius H: A randomized controlled trial of rivastigmine for chronic sequels of traumatic brain injury—what it showed and taught? Brain Inj 2009, 23:548–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silver JM, Koumaras B, Meng X, et al.: Long-term effects of rivastigmine capsules in patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2009, 23:123–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Neurobehavioral Guidelines Working Group, Warden DL, Gordon B, et al.: Guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2006, 23:1468–1501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Whyte J, Vaccaro M, Grieb-Neff P, et al.: The effects of bromocriptine on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 87:85–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sawyer E, Mauro LS, Ohlinger MJ: Amantadine enhancement of arousal and cognition after traumatic brain injury. Ann Pharmacother 2008, 42:247–252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsaousides T, Gordon WA: Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: assessment to treatment. Mt Sinai J Med 2009, 76:173–181. This paper provides a brief review of the evidence supporting common interventions, as well as descriptions of techniques to help providers who are unfamiliar with them.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Galbiati S, Recla M, Pastore VA, et al.: Attention remediation following traumatic brain injury in childhood and adolescence. Neuropsychology 2009, 23:40–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rohling ML, Faust ME, Beverly B, et al.: Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al’.s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology 2009, 23:20–39. This is a large meta-analytic paper of 115 studies of cognitive rehabilitation trials. Domain-specific effects of moderate size were found for attention intervention. Only weak support was found for memory and language treatment domains. No domain-specific evidence was found for visuospatial treatments. However, the authors noted that findings based on single group pretest/posttest designs (61% of studies considered) may overrepresent naturally occurring retest effects. Age, etiology of deficit, and recovery level were also noted to be significant confounders in rehabilitation studies.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vallat-Azouvi C, Pradat-Diehl P, Azouvi P: Rehabilitation of the central executive of working memory after severe traumatic brain injury: two single-case studies. Brain Inj 2009, 23:585–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raskin SA, Sohlberg MM: Prospective memory intervention: a review and evaluation of a pilot restorative intervention. Brain Impair 2009, 10:76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Neill Pirozzi T, Strangman G, Goldstein R, et al.: A controlled treatment study of internal memory strategies (I-MEMS) following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010, 25(1):43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Constantinidou F, Thomas RD, Robinson L: Benefits of categorization training in patients with traumatic brain injury during post-acute rehabilitation: additional evidence from a randomized controlled trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008, 23:312–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Satish U, Streufert S, Eslinger PJ: Simulation-based executive cognitive assessment and rehabilitation after traumatic frontal lobe injury: a case report. Disabil Rehabil 2008, 30:468–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy MRT, Coelho C, Turkstra L, et al.: Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008, 18:257–299. The authors evaluated the evidence for specific therapies designed to improve everyday problem-solving, planning, and multi-tasking. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, five with Class I evidence. Support was found for treatments emphasizing self-monitoring of cognition. Metacognitive strategy instruction was recommended as a practice standard for young to middle-aged adults.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spikman JM, Boelen DH, Lamberts KF, et al.: Effects of a multifaceted treatment program for executive dysfunction after acquired brain injury on indications of executive functioning in daily life. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2010, 16:118–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fong KN, Howie DR: Effects of an explicit problem-solving skills training program using a metacomponential approach for outpatients with acquired brain injury. Am J Occup Ther 2009, 63:525–534.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Polatajko HJ, Mandich AD, Miller LT, Macnab JJ: Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): part II—the evidence. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2001, 20:83–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, et al.: Using the cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP) with adults with executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Can J Occup Ther 2009, 76:115–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bergquist T, Geh C, Mandrekar J, et al.: The effect of internet-based cognitive rehabilitation in persons with memory impairments after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2009, 23:790–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shoenberg MR, Ruwe WD, Dawson K, et al.: Comparison of functional outcomes and treatment cost between a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation teletherapy program and a face-to-face rehabilitation program. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2008, 39:169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Topolovec-Vranic J, Cullen N, Michalak D, et al.: Evaluation of an online cognitive behavioral therapy program by patients with traumatic brain injury and depression. Brain Inj 2010, 24:762–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Minardi J, Crocco TJ: Management of traumatic brain injury: first link in chain of survival. Mt Sinai J Med 2009, 76:138–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, et al.: Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: a community-based trial. Brain Inj 2008, 22:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson BA, Emslie H, Quirk K, et al.: A randomized control trial to evaluate a paging system for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2005, 19:891–894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Blake H, Batson M: Exercise intervention in brain injury: a pilot randomized study of Tai Chi Qigong. Clin Rehabil 2009, 23:589–598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Leddy JJ, Kozlowski K, Donnelly JP, et al.: A preliminary study of subsymptom threshold exercise training for refractory post-concussion syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 2010, 20:21–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yip BCB, Man DWK: Virtual reality (VR)–based community living skills training for people with acquired brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj 2009, 23:1017–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Golden Z, Colden CJ, Neubauer RA: Improving neuropsychological function after chronic brain injury with hyperbaric oxygen. Disabil Rehabil 2006, 28:1379–1386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wright JK, Zant E, Groom K, et al.: Case report: treatment of mild traumatic brain injury with hyperbaric oxygen. Undersea Hyperb Med 2009, 36:391–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thornton KE, Carmody DP: Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: QEEG biofeedback treatment protocols. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2009, 34:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Laatsch L, Harrington D, Hotz G, et al.: An evidenced-based review of cognitive and behavioral rehabilitation treatment studies in children with acquired brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010, 25:43–51. Two treatment recommendations and one treatment option were developed as a result of this evidence-based review of cognitive and behavioral treatments for children with a history of acquired brain injury.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Glang A, Ylvisaker M, Stein M, et al.: Validated instructional practices: application to students with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008, 23:243–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr. Cernich has received a consulting fee from Intelligent Automation Inc. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VA Maryland Health Care System, 10 North Greene Street, BT/116/MH, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Alison N. Cernich PhD, Shira M. Kurtz PhD, Kristen L. Mordecai PhD & Patricia B. Ryan PhD

Authors
  1. Alison N. Cernich PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shira M. Kurtz PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristen L. Mordecai PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patricia B. Ryan PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison N. Cernich PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cernich, A.N., Kurtz, S.M., Mordecai, K.L. et al. Cognitive Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr Treat Options Neurol 12, 412–423 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-010-0085-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-010-0085-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation