Skip to main content
Log in

Update on Device Technologies for Monitoring Heart Failure

  • Arrhythmias (B Stambler, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Congestive heart failure (CHF) affects more than 5 million people in the United States and is one of the most common reasons for recurrent hospitalizations. Since the majority of admissions related to CHF are secondary to progressively worsening congestion, many clinicians are quick to initiate aggressive diuresis once early signs of impending heart failure develop. These signs are based in large measure on patient-reported symptoms. Unfortunately, recent trials have shown that traditional ambulatory monitoring of heart failure using patient symptoms or body weight do not reduce episodes of decompensated heart failure requiring hospitalization. This has led to great interest in developing monitoring systems that can detect impending episodes of CHF even prior to the development of symptoms. Some of the these systems utilize existing implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices to monitor electrophysiologic parameters including the presence of ventricular arrhythmias, heart rate variability and even transthoracic impedances. Other more recent developments have focused on more invasive hemodynamic monitoring systems that can measure pressures in the right ventricle, pulmonary arteries and the left atrium. The data on the utility of such systems is limited but encouraging. While none of these systems are currently FDA approved, they have been applied in a number of clinical trials. This paper highlights the currently available monitoring systems for heart failure and reviews the evidence supporting its use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2012 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2012;125:e2–e220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg LR, Piette JD, Walsh MN, et al. Randomized trial of a daily electronic home monitoring system in patients with advanced heart failure: the weight monitoring in heart failure (WHARF) trial. Am Heart J. 2003;146:705–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland JG, Louis AA, Rigby AS, et al. Noninvasive home telemonitoring for patients with heart failure at high risk of recurrent admission and death: the trans-european network-home-care management system (TEN-HMS) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1654–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaudhry SI, Mattera JA, Curtis JP, et al. Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2301–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koehler F, Winkler S, Schieber M, et al. Impact of remote telemedical management on mortality and hospitalizations in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure: the telemedical interventional monitoring in heart failure study. Circulation. 2011;123:1873–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:695–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathew J, Hunsberger S, Fleg J, et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic significance of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in congestive heart failure. Chest. 2000;118:914–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Maestri R, et al. Short-term heart rate variability strongly predicts sudden cardiac death in chronic heart failure patients. Circulation. 2003;107:565–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adamson PB, Smith AL, Abraham WT, et al. Continuous autonomic assessment in patients with symptomatic heart failure: prognostic value of heart rate variability measured by an implanted cardiac resynchronization device. Circulation. 2004;110:2389–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu CM, Wang L, Chau E, et al. Intrathoracic impedance monitoring in patients with heart failure: correlation with fluid status and feasibility of early warning preceding hospitalization. Circulation. 2005;112:841–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vollmann D, Nagele H, Schauerte P, et al. Clinical utility of intrathoracic impedance monitoring to alert patients with an implanted device of deteriorating chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1835–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Small RS, Wickemeyer W, Germany R, et al. Changes in intrathoracic impedance are associated with subsequent risk of hospitalizations for acute decompensated heart failure: clinical utility of implanted device monitoring without a patient alert. J Card Fail. 2009;15:475–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham WT, Compton S, Haas G, et al. Intrathoracic impedance vs daily weight monitoring for predicting worsening heart failure events: results of the fluid accumulation status trial (FAST). Congest Heart Fail (Greenwich, Conn). 2011;17:51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Conraads VM, Tavazzi L, Santini M, et al. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of implantable intrathoracic impedance monitoring as a predictor of heart failure hospitalizations: the SENSE-HF trial. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brachmann J, Bohm M, Rybak K, et al. Fluid status monitoring with a wireless network to reduce cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and mortality in heart failure: rationale and design of the OptiLink HF study (optimization of heart failure management using OptiVol fluid status monitoring and CareLink). Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:796–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whellan DJ, Ousdigian KT, Al-Khatib SM, et al. Combined heart failure device diagnostics identify patients at higher risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalizations. Results from PARTNERS HF (program to access and review trending information and evaluate correlation to symptoms in patients with heart failure) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourge RC, Abraham WT, Adamson PB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of an implantable continuous hemodynamic monitor in patients with advanced heart failure. The COMPASS-HF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1073–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adamson PB, Gold MR, Bennett T, et al. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: results of the reducing decompensation events utilizing intracardiac pressures in patients with chronic heart failure (REDUCEhf) trial. Congest Heart Fail. 2011;17:248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Verdejo HE, Castro PF, Concepcion R, et al. Comparison of a radiofrequency-based wireless pressure sensor to swan-ganz catheter and echocardiography for ambulatory assessment of pulmonary artery pressure in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2375–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silver MA. New approaches to hemodynamic measurement cool devices but a shaky infrastructure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2383–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:658–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fonarow GC. Heart failure: wireless hemodynamic monitoring-a new approach for managing HF. Nature Revs. 2011;8:245–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Adamson PB, Abraham WT, Bourge RC, et al. CardioMEMS heart sensor allows monitoring of pressures to improve outcomes in NYHA class III heart failure patients (CHAMPION) trial: impact of hemodynamic guided care on patients with preserved ejection fraction. J Card Fail. 2010;16:913.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoppe UC, Vanderheyden M, Sievert H, et al. Chronic monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure in patients with severe heart failure: multicentre experience of the monitoring pulmonary artery pressure by implantable device responding to ultrasonic signal (PAPIRUS) II study. Heart. 2009;95:1091–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Troughton RW, Ritzema J, Eigler NL, et al. Direct left atrial pressure monitoring in severe heart failure: long-term sensor performance. J Cardiovasc Trans Res. 2011;4:3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ritzema J, Troughton R, Melton I, et al. Physician-directed patient self-management of left atrial pressure in advanced chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2010;121:1086–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hammond RL, Hanna K, Morgan C, et al. A wireless and battery-less miniature intracardiac pressure sensor: early implantation studies. ASAIO J. 2012;58:83–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

B. Singh: none; S. D. Russell: none. A. Cheng has served as a consultant for Biotronik and Medtronic, and has received payment for the development of educational presentations from Boston Scientific and St. Jude Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Cheng MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, B., Russell, S.D. & Cheng, A. Update on Device Technologies for Monitoring Heart Failure. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 14, 536–549 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-012-0192-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-012-0192-7

Keywords

Navigation