Skip to main content
Log in

How can one develop disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis?

  • Published:
Current Rheumatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug should be able to interfere with the cartilage breakdown observed in this disease. The current question is whether development of a drug should be focused on structural parameters (eg, radiologic joint space width, magnetic resonance imaging cartilage volume, and so on), on clinical parameters such as functional impairment, or on a composite index such as the capacity of the study drug to prevent and/or to retard the requirement for total articular replacement. Another aspect of osteoarthritis trials is that several recent advances have greatly facilitated the conduct of phase I and II studies, such as biological markers of cartilage metabolism and magnetic resonance imaging parameters of cartilage breakdown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Reginster JY, Deroisy R, Rovati L, et al.: Long-term effect of glucosamine sulfate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2001, 27:251–265. This study reports the positive clinic and radiologic effect of glucosamine in a placebo-controlled study in knee osteoarthritis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geba GP, Weaver AL, Polis AB, et al.: Efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized trial. JAMA 2002, 287:989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clemett D, Goa KL: Celecoxib: a review of its use in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and acute pain. Drugs 2001, 61:498.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dougados M, Nguyen M, Berdah L, et al.: Evaluation of the structure-modifying effects of diacerein in hip osteoarthritis: ECHODIAH, a three-year, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 44:2539–2547. This study reports the positive radiologic effect of diacerein in a placebo-controlled study in hip osteoarthritis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lequesne M, Maheu E, Cadet C, Dreiser RL: Structural effect of avocado/soybean unsaponifiables on joint space loss in osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 47:50–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Uebelhart D, Malaise M, Marcolongo R, et al.: Intermittent treatment of knee osteoarthritis with oral chondroitin sulfate: a one-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study versus placebo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:269–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lequesne M, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P: Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Validation-value in comparison with other assessment tests. Scand J Rheumatol 1987, 65(Suppl):85–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al.: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833–1840.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolnot-Delmas D, Buch JP, Zeidler H, Dougados M: Ro 15-8081 in osteoarthritis of hip and knee: a double-blind placebo controlled multicentre dose-ranging study on analgesia. Pain 1996, 64:99–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Katz BP: Doxycycline (DOXY) slows the rate of joint space narrowing (JSN) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Paper presented at the American College of Rheumatology Meeting. Orlando, FL, October 2003.

  11. Spector TD, Dacre JE, Harris PA, et al.: Radiological progression of osteoarthritis: a 11 year follow-up study of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1992, 51:1107–1110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Soballe K, et al.: The distribution and inter-relationships of radiologic features of osteoarthritis of the hip. A survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen City Heart Study: the Osteoarthritis substudy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:704–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS: Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957, 16:494–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Croft P, Cooper C, Coggon D: Case definition of hip osteoarthritis in epidemiologic studies. J Rheumatol 1994, 21:591–592.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ravaud P, Dougados M: Radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1997, 24:781–789.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raynaud JP, Kauffman C, Beaudoins G, et al.: Reliability of quantification imaging system using magnetic resonance images to measure normal and osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003, 11:351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pessis E, Drapé JL, Ravaud P, et al.: Assessment of progression in knee osteoarthritis: results of a 1 year study comparing arthroscopy and MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003, 11:361–369. This 1 year longitudinal study compared the sensitivity to change of the cartilage breakdown evaluated using plain radiographs (joint space width) or using MRI (surface cartilage defects) and suggest that the MRI scoring system is more sensitive than the radiologic one.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status. Ann Rheum Dis 1996, 55:356–362.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: Radiographic features predictive of radiographic progression in hip osteoarthritis. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997, 64:795–803.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pavelka K, Gatterova J, Olejarova M, et al.: Glucosamine sulphate delays progression of knee osteoarthritis: a 3-year, randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Arch Intern Med 2002, 162:2113–2123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: Requirement for total hip arthroplasty: an outcome measure of hip osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1999, 26:855–861.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abadie E, Ethgen D, Avouac B, et al.: Recommendations of the use of new methods to assess the efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:263–268. The authors have updated the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science recommendations concerning the conduct of clinical trials in osteoarthritis. They are emphasizing the use of "requirement to surgery" as a potential phase III endpoint.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, et al.: NIH Conference. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2: treatment approaches. Ann Intern Med 2000, 133:726–737.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. NIH consensus conference: Total hip replacement. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Total Hip Replacement. JAMA 1995, 273:1950–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, et al.: EULAR recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003, 62:1145–1155. The European League Against Rheumatism standing committee for international studies including clinical trials (ESCISIT) has promoted two task forces aimed at developing recommendations for management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Such recommendations are provided based on a systematic literature research and experts’ opinion. They are presented as 10 short-term sentences "take home messages" reflecting the current knowledge in this area.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang W, Doherty M, Arden N, et al.: EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis. Report of a task force of the standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutic (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2004, In press. The European League Against Rheumatism standing committee for international studies including clinical trials (ESCISIT) has promoted two task forces aimed at developing recommendations for management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Such recommendations are provided based on a systematic literature research and experts’ opinion. They are presented as 10 short-term sentences "take home messages" reflecting the current knowledge in this area.

  27. Maillefert JF, Dougados M: Is time to joint replacement a valid outcome measure in clinical trials of drugs for osteoarthritis? Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2003, 29:831–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Merx H, Sdreinhöfer K, Schäder P, et al.: International variation in hip replacement rates. Ann Rheum Dis 2003, 62:222–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maillefert JF, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: A composite index for total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:347–352. This study is proposing a composite index permitting to consider at a certain point of time the indication of surgery in a patient suffering from hip osteoarthritis.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hadorn HC, Holmes AC: Education and debate: the New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: overview. Br Med J 1997, 314:131–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lequesne M, Taccoen A: Clinical and radiographic status of patients in the ECHODIAH study who underwent THA. Pertinence of the pain-function index for operative decision making. Presse Med 2002, 31:4518–4519.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Glazier RH, et al.: Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1016–1022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mazieres B, Garnero P, Gueguen A, et al.: Molecular markers of cartilage breakdown and synovitis are strong independent predictors of structural progression of hip osteoarthritis (OA). The ECHODIAH cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2003, 48(Suppl 9):S683.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maillefert JF, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: Evaluation of the minimum clinically important change in radiological progression in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Part 1: validation using predictive validity for total hip arthroplasty. Rheumatology 2002, 41:142–147. This paper is exploring the concept of predictive validity of the radiologic evaluation of cartilage breakdown (joint space width) using as "gold standard" the requirement to surgery and as evaluated marker the changes in joint space width over a period of 1 year.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Maillefert JF, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: Evaluation of the minimum clinically important change in radiological progression in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Part 2: validation using an expert panel’s opinion. Rheumatology 2002, 41:148–152. This paper is exploring the concept of predictive validity of the radiologic evaluation of cartilage breakdown (joint space width) using as "gold standard" the requirement to surgery and as evaluated marker the changes in joint space width over a period of 1 year.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Garnero P, Ayral X, Rousseau JC, et al.: Uncoupling type II collagen synthesis and degradation predicts progression of joint damage in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46:2613–2624.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Felson DT: The epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence and risk factors. In Osteoarthritic Disorders. Edited by Kuettner KE, Goldberg VM. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1994:13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Arthroplasty and total joint procedures. Section 4. In Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States. Edited by Praemer A, Furner S, Rice DP. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1999:121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Altman RD, Bloch DA, Dougados M, et al.: Measurement of structural progression of the hip: the Barcelona consensus group. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:515–524. This paper provides recommendations concerning the data acquisitions but also the analysis of radiograph in hip osteoarthritis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Hochberg MC, et al.: Progression of radiographic hip osteoarthritis over eight years in a community sample of elderly white women. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:1477–1486. This 7-year longitudinal epidemiologic study clearly demonstrates a more rapid and severe progression of hip osteoarthritis in the subgroup of symptomatic patients at baseline when compared with the asymptomatic patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ravaud P, Giraudeau B, Logeart I, et al.: Management of osteoarthritis (OA) with an unsupervised home based exercise program and/or patient administered assessment tools. A cluster randomized controlled trial with a 2x2 factorial design. Ann Rheum Dis 2004, 63:703–708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tubach F, Baron G, Dougados M, et al.: Predictive factors of total knee replacement due to primary osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003, 48(Suppl 9):S77.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tubach F, Baron G, Ravaud P, et al.: Predictive factors of total hip replacement due to primary osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003, 48(Suppl 9):S77.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: Longitudinal radiologic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 1992, 19:378–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dougados M, Nakache JP, Gueguen A: Criteria for generalized and focal osteoarthritis. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1996, 63:669–676.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dougados M: Structural progression is also driven by clinical symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:1360–1365. This editorial is reviewing all the data evaluating the different anatomic sources of pain in osteoarthritis (synovitis, osteitis, tendinitis, and so on) and the correlation existing between such anatomic abnormalities and a subsequent structural deterioration of the osteoarthritis process.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Felson DT, McLaughlin S, Goggins J, et al.: Bone marrow edema and its relation to progression of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med 2003, 139:330–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ayral X, Pickering EH, Woodworth TG, et al.: Synovitis predicts the arthroscopic progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 44(Suppl 9):S101.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Grassi W, Filipucci E, Carotti M, Salaffi F: Imaging modalities for identifying the origin of musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003, 17:17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dieppe P, Cushnagan J, Young P, Kirwan J: Prediction of the progression of joint space narrowing of the knee by bone scintigraphy. Ann Rheum Dis 1993, 52:557–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ayral X, Dougados M, Listrat V, et al.: Arthroscopic evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 1996, 23:698–706.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dougados M, Ayral X, Listrat V, et al.: The SFA system for assessing articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy of the knee. Arthroscopy 1994, 10:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dougados, M. How can one develop disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis?. Curr Rheumatol Rep 7, 22–28 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-005-0005-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-005-0005-z

Keywords

Navigation