Abstract
Although the term “prehypertension” has been challenged by some, its use to define people with systolic blood pressure (BP) between 120 and 139 mm Hg and/or diastolic pressures between 80 and 89 mm Hg has gained general acceptance. The category includes as many people as the number who have hypertension, defined as blood pressure of 140/90 or above. Such people are clearly at an increased risk of cardiovascular damage compared with people with BPs below 120/80 mm Hg. The major unresolved issue is the appropriate management of such patients. Two trials have attempted to document the value of short-term drug therapy to prevent the progression of BP to overt hypertension, but no outcome studies are currently available.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al.: Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002, 360:1903–1913.
Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al.: Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1291–1297.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al.: Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003, 42:1206–1252.
Mancia G, De BG, Dominiczak A, et al.: 2007 ESH-ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: ESH-ESC Task Force on the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 2007, 25:1751–1762.
Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Kirmani JF, et al.: Is prehypertension a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases? Stroke 2005, 36:1859–1863.
Kshirsagar AV, Carpenter M, Bang H, et al.: Blood pressure usually considered normal is associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Am J Med 2006, 119:133–141.
Sipahi I, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al.: Effects of normal, pre-hypertensive, and hypertensive blood pressure levels on progression of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:833–838.
Nguyen TT, Wang JJ, Wong TY: Retinal vascular changes in pre-diabetes and prehypertension: new findings and their research and clinical implications. Diabetes Care 2007, 30:2708–2715.
Syamala S, Li J, Shankar A: Association between serum uric acid and prehypertension among US adults. J Hypertens 2007, 25:1583–1589.
Kokkinos P, Pittaras A, Narayan P, et al.: Exercise capacity and blood pressure associations with left ventricular mass in prehypertensive individuals. Hypertension 2007, 49:55–61.
Erdogan D, Yildirim I, Ciftci O, et al.: Effects of normal blood pressure, prehypertension, and hypertension on coronary microvascular function. Circulation 2007, 115:593–599.
Ninomiya T, Kubo M, Doi Y, et al.: Prehypertension increases the risk for renal arteriosclerosis in autopsies: the Hisayama Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 18:2135–2142.
Hansen TW, Staessen JA, Zhang H, et al.: Cardiovascular outcome in relation to progression to hypertension in the Copenhagen MONICA cohort. Am J Hypertens 2007, 20:483–491.
Freis ED, Ragan D, Pillsbury H 3rd, Mathews M: Alteration of the course of hypertension in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Circ Res 1972, 31:1–7.
Harrap SB, Van der Merwe WM, Griffin SA, et al.: Brief angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment in young spontaneously hypertensive rats reduces blood pressure long-term. Hypertension 1990, 16:603–614.
Julius S, Nesbitt SD, Egan BM, et al.: Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. N Engl J Med 2006, 354:1685–1697.
Skov K, Eiskjaer H, Hansen HE, et al.: Treatment of young subjects at high familial risk of future hypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. Hypertension 2007, 50:89–95.
Brett AS: Ethical issues in risk factor intervention. Am J Med 1984, 76:557–561.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, N.M. Treating prehypertension: A review of the evidence. Current Science Inc 10, 326–329 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-008-0060-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-008-0060-8