Abstract
This paper reports on the performance of Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System (ADMS) 4.2 in predicting peak and mean ambient sulfur dioxide concentrations at two sites adjacent to the Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate in Eastern Thailand, the centre of the country’s petrochemical industry. The model comprised 100 individual stacks and utilised four separate meteorological datasets from different points around the site. We show that model performance varies according to the location at which the meteorological data were obtained, with considerable differences in model outputs observed for meteorological stations that are relatively close to each other. The best performances were observed when there was co-location of the meteorological data and receptor. In such cases, acceptance criteria for the majority of performance parameters were satisfied across averaging periods ranging from 1 h to 7 days. We have also compared the results from this study with those obtained from a recent literature American Meteorological Society/United States Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD) study for the same site and time period; the comparison indicates that AERMOD is likely to be similarly influenced by the choice of meteorological dataset. Using ADMS model simulations for all four meteorological datasets and a breakdown of the local population by electoral ward, we were able to estimate exposure over 1 h, 24 h and yearly averaging periods and compare these to air quality standards and guidelines published by Thailand, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the European Union (EU). The results of this analysis showed that despite the large variations in overall model performance, the impact of choice of meteorological dataset on prediction of compliance with the standards and guidelines is relatively small: the WHO 24-h guideline of 7.5 ppb (100th percentile) was predicted to be exceeded in all of the wards for all meteorological datasets, whilst compliance with Thai and EU standards was predicted for at least 86 % of the population, with relatively little variation between the different meteorological datasets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System
American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model
Operational Priority Substances model
Local Atmospheric Dispersion and Deposition model
References
Aikawa M, Hiraki T, Eiho J (2008) Grouping and representativeness of monitoring stations based on wind speed and wind direction data in urban areas of Japan. Environ Monit Assess 136(1–3):411–418
API (2006) Fluorescent SO2 analyser operator manual. Teledyne Advanced Pollution Instrumentation, San Diego
Atkinson RW, Cohen A, Mehta S, Anderson HR (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological time-series studies on outdoor air pollution and health in Asia. Air Qual Atmos Hlth 5(4):383–391
Aungudornpukdee P, Vichit-Vadakan N (2009) Risk factors affecting visual-motor coordination deficit among children residing near a petrochemical industrial estate. Nepal Med Coll J 11(4):241–246
Aungudornpukdee P, Vichit-Vadakan N, Taneepanichskul S (2010) Factors related to short-term memory dysfunction in children residing near a petrochemical industrial estate. J Med Assoc Thailand 93(3):285–292
Carruthers DJ, Holroy DRJ, Hunt JCR, Weng WS, Robins AG, Apsley DD, Thomson DJ, Smith FB (1994) UK-ADMS—a new approach to modelling dispersion in the earth’s atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 52(1–3):139–153
Carruthers DJ, Seaton MD, McHugh CA, Sheng X, Solazzo E, Vanvyve E (2011) Comparison of the complex terrain algorithms incorporated into two commonly used local-scale air pollution dispersion models (ADMS and AERMOD) using a hybrid model. J Air Waste Man 61(11):1227–1235
CERC (2012a) ADMS 5 user guide. Cambridge
CERC (2012b) Plume/puff spread and mean concentration module specifications. Cambridge
Chang JC, Hanna SR (2004) Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys 87(1–3):167–196
Chen H, Goldberg MS, Villeneuve PJ (2008) A systematic review of the relation between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and chronic diseases. Rev Environ Health 23:243–297
Chen RJ, Huang W, Wong CM, Wang ZS, Thach TQ, Chen BH, Kan HD, Grp CC (2012) Short-term exposure to sulfur dioxide and daily mortality in 17 Chinese cities: the China air pollution and health effects study (CAPES). Environ Res 118:101–106
Chusai C, Manomaiphiboon K, Saiyasitpanich P, Thepanondh S (2012) NO2 and SO2 dispersion modeling and relative roles of emission sources over Map Ta Phut industrial area, Thailand. J Air Waste Manage 62(8):932–945
Cimorelli AJ, Perry SG, Venkatram A, Weil JC, Paine RJ, Wilson RB, Lee RF, Peters WD, Brode RW (2005) AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: general model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J Appl Meteorol 44(5):682–693
Cosemans G, Kretzschmar J, Mensink C (2008) Pollutant roses for daily averaged ambient air pollutant concentrations. Atmos Environ 42(29):6982–6991
Cox WM (1992) Protocol for determining the best performing model. vol PB-93-226082/XAB; EPA--454/R-92/025. USEPA (PB-93-226082/XAB; EPA--454/R-92/025)
Cox WM, Tikvart JA (1990) A statistical procedure for determining the best performing air-quality simulation-model. Atmos Environ a-Gen 24(9):2387–2395
DEFRA (2009) Review & assessment: technical guidance LAQM.TG(09)
DEFRA (2013) UK and EU Air Quality Limits. Available at: http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/air-pollution/uk-eu-limits. Accessed 22 Feb 2013
Dresser AL, Huizer RD (2011) CALPUFF and AERMOD model validation study in the near field: Martins Creek revisited. J Air Waste Manage 61(6):647–659
Forbes LJL, Kapetanakis V, Rudnicka AR, Cook DG, Bush T, Stedman JR, Whincup PH, Strachan DP, Anderson HR (2009) Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and lung function in adults. Thorax 64(8):657–663
Hanna SR, Chang J (2012a) Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys 116(3–4):133–146
Hanna SR, Chang J (2012b) Setting acceptance criteria for air quality models. In: Steyn DG, Castelli ST (eds) Air pollution modeling and its application XXI. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C-Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 479-484
Hanna SR, Egan BA, Purdum J (2001) Evaluation of the ADMS, AERMOD, and ISC3 dispersion models with the OPTEX, Duke Forest, Kincaid, Indianapolis and Lovett field datasets. Int J Environ Pollut 16(1–6):301–314
Henry RC (2008) Locating and quantifying the impact of local sources of air pollution. Atmos Environ 42(2):358–363
Henry RC, Chang YS, Spiegelman CH (2002) Locating nearby sources of air pollution by nonparametric regression of atmospheric concentrations on wind direction. Atmos Environ 36(13):2237–2244
Hill J (1998) Applications of computational modelling to ammonia dispersion from agricultural sources. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London
Holmes NS, Morawska L (2006) A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmos Environ 40(30):5902–5928
Jadsri S, Singhasivanon P, Kaewkungwal J, Sithiprasasna R, Siriruttanapruk S, Konchom S (2006) Spatio-temporal effects of estimated pollutants released from an industrial estate on the occurrence of respiratory disease in Maptaphut Municipality, Thailand. Int J Health Geogr 5:48–48
Katsouyanni K, Touloumi G, Spix C, Schwartz J, Balducci F, Medina S, Rossi G, Wojtyniak B, Sunyer J, Bacharova L, Schouten JP, Ponka A, Anderson HR (1997) Short term effects of ambient sulphur dioxide and particulate matter on mortality in 12 European cities: results from time series data from the APHEA project. Brit Med J 314(7095):1658–1663
Mohan M, Bhati S, Sreenivas A, Marrapu P (2011) Performance evaluation of AERMOD and ADMS-Urban for total suspended particulate matter concentrations in megacity Delhi. Aerosol Air Qual Res 11(7):883–894
Oke TR (1992) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York
Peluso M, Srivatanakul P, Jedpiyawongse A, Sangrajrang S, Munnia A, Piro S, Ceppi M, Boffetta P, Godschalk RWL, van Schooten FJ (2013) Aromatic DNA adducts and number of lung cancer risk alleles in Map-Ta-Phut Industrial Estate workers and nearby residents. Mutagenesis 28(1):57–63
Peluso M, Srivatanakul P, Munnia A, Jedpiyawongse A, Ceppi M, Sangrajrang S, Piro S, Boffetta P (2010) Malondialdehyde-deoxyguanosine adducts among workers of a Thai industrial estate and nearby residents. Environ Health Persp 118(1):55–59
Peluso M, Srivatanakul P, Munnia A, Jedpiyawongse A, Meunier A, Sangrajrang S, Piro S, Ceppi M, Boffetta P (2008) DNA adduct formation among workers in a Thai industrial estate and nearby residents. Sci Total Environ 389(2–3):283–288
Pollution Control Department (2013) Air and Noise Standards. Available at: http://www.pcd.go.th/info_serv/en_reg_std_airsnd01.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2013
Pope CA, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston GD (2002) Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Jama-J Am Med Assoc 287(9):1132–1141
Ratto G, Videla F, Almandos JR, Maronna R, Schinca D (2006) Study of meteorological aspects and urban concentration of SO2 in atmospheric environment of La Plata, Argentina. Environ Monit Assess 121(1–3):327–342
Rigby M, Timmis R, Toumi R (2006) Similarities of boundary layer ventilation and particulate matter roses. Atmos Environ 40(27):5112–5124
Robins AG, Apsley DD (2013a) Modelling of building effects in ADMS. ADMS Technical Specification P16/01T/13. CERC, Cambridge
Robins AG, Apsley DD (2013b) Plume Rise Model Specification. ADMS Technical Specification P11/02P/13. CERC, Cambridge
Tanyanont W, Vichit-Vadakan N (2012) Exposure to volatile organic compounds and health risks among residents in an area affected by a petrochemical complex in Rayong, Thailand. SE Asian J Trop Med 43(1):201–211
Theobald MR, Lofstrom P, Walker J, Andersen HV, Pedersen P, Vallejo A, Sutton MA (2012) An intercomparison of models used to simulate the short-range atmospheric dispersion of agricultural ammonia emissions. Environ Model Softw 37:90–102
Uapipatanakul S (2009) Monitoring, modelling and health impacts of air pollutants arising from the Maptaphut Industrial Estates, Thailand. Ph.D. thesis, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne
US Environmental Protection Agency (2013) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Available at: http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2013
Van Jaarsveld JA (2004) The operational priority substances model; Description and Validation of OPS-Pro 4.1. RIVM
WHO (2006) WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide—Global Update 2005—summary of the risk assessment. Geneva
Yu ITS, Zhang YH, Tam WWS, Yan QH, Xu YJ, Xun XJ, Wu W, Ma WJ, Tian LW, Tse LA, Qian X (2012) Effect of ambient air pollution on daily mortality rates in Guangzhou, China. Atmos Environ 46:528–535
Zou B, Zhan FB, Wilson JG, Zeng YN (2010) Performance of AERMOD at different time scales. Simul Model Pract Th 18(5):612–623
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Pollution Control Department of Thailand and to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment for providing meteorological and ambient monitoring data for use in this study. We would also like to thank the Bureau of Industrial Environmental Technology and the Ministry of Industry for their support.
Maps included throughout this paper were created using ArcGIS software by Esri and used under license (Northumbria University).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 7.84 MB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deary, M.E., Uapipatanakul, S. Evaluation of the performance of ADMS in predicting the dispersion of sulfur dioxide from a complex source in Southeast Asia: implications for health impact assessments. Air Qual Atmos Health 7, 381–399 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-013-0225-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-013-0225-8