Skip to main content
Log in

The key role of impurities in ancient damascus steel blades

  • Archaeotechnology
  • Feature
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The art of producing the famous 16–18th century Damascus steel blades found in many museums was lost long ago. Recently, however, research has established strong evidence supporting the theory that the distinct surface patterns on these blades result from a carbide-banding phenomenon produced by the microsegregation of minor amounts of carbide-forming elements present in the wootz ingots from which the blades were forged. Further, it is likely that wootz Damascus blades with damascene patterns may have been produced only from wootz ingots supplied from those regions of India having appropriate impurity-containing ore deposits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Sache, Damascus Steel, Myth, History, Technology Applications (Düsseldorf, Germany: Stahleisen, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Bronson, “The Making and Selling of Wootz,” Archeomaterials, 1 (1986), pp. 13–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Rostoker and B. Bronson, “Pre-Industrial Iron, Its Technology and Ethnology,” Archeomaterial Monograph No. 1 (Philadelphia, PA: Archaeomaterials, 1990), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.S. Figiel, On Damascus Steel (Atlantas, FL: Atlantas Arts Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.S. Smith, A History of Metallography, Chapters 3 and 4 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.S. Smith, “Damascus Steel,” Science, 216 (1983), pp. 242–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Wadsworth and O.D. Sherby, “Damascus Steel-Making,” Science, 216 (1983), pp. 328–330.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.D. Verhoeven and D.T. Peterson, “What is Damascus Steel?” Mat. Char., 29 (1992), pp. 355–341.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Breant, “Description of a Process for Making Damasked Steel,” Annals of Philosophy, 8 (1824), pp. 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Anossoff and O. Bulatakh, Gornyj Journal (2) (1841), pp. 157–318.

  11. N.T. Belaiew, “Uber Damast,” Metallurgie, 8 (1911), pp. 449–456; “Damast, seine Struktur und Eigenschaften,” Metallurgie, 8 (1911), pp. 699–704; “Damascene Steel,” J. Iron and Steel Inst., 97 (1918), pp. 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Wadsworth and O.D. Sherby, “On the Bulat-Damascus Steel Revisited,” Prog. Mat. Sci., 25 (1980), pp. 35–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Zschokke, “Du Damasse et des Lames de Damas,” Rev. Met., 21 (1924), pp. 635–669.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.D. Verhoeven and A.H. Pendray, “The Mystery of the Damascus Sword,” Muse, 2 (2) (April 1998), pp. 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.D. Verhoeven and A.H. Pendray, “Experiments to Reproduce the Pattern of Damascus Steel Blades,” Mat. Char., 29 (1992), pp. 195–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J.D. Verhoeven, A.H. Pendray, and P.M. Berge, “Studies of Damascus Steel Blades: Part II–Destruction and Reformation of the Pattern,” Mat. Char., 30 (1993), pp. 187–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J.D. Verhoeven, A.H. Pendray, and E.D. Gibson, “Wootz Damascus Steel Blades,” Mat. Char., 37 (1996), pp. 9–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J.D. Verhoeven et al., “Microsegregation and Banding in Hypereutectoid Steel: Damascus Steel,” ISS Trans., 25 (in press).

  19. E.M. Taleff et al., “Pearlite in Ultrahigh Carbon Steels: Heat Treatments and Mechanical Properties,” Met. Mat. Trans. A, 27A (1996), pp. 111–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.D. Verhoeven and E.D. Gibson, “The Divorced Eutectoid Transformation (DET) in Steel,” Met. Mat. Trans., 29A (1998), pp. 1181–1189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. D.T. Peterson, H.H. Baker, and J.D. Verhoeven, “Damascus Steel, Characterization of One Damascus Steel Sword,” Mat. Char., 24 (1990), pp. 355–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Massalski, “Preparation de lacier Damasse en Perse,” Ann. Du Journal des Mines de Russie (1841), pp. 297–308.

  23. H.T.P. J. duc de Luynes, Memoire sur la Fabrication de lacier Foundu et Damassee (Paris: 1844).

  24. C. Panseri, “Damascus Steel in Legend and Reality,” Gladius, IV (1965), pp. 5–66.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R.A. Grange, “Effect of Microstructural Banding in Steel,” Met. Trans., 2 (1971), pp. 417–426.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. L.E. Samuals, Optical Microscopy of Carbon Steels (Metals Park, OH: ASM, 1980), pp. 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S.W. Thompson and P.R. Howell, “Factors Influencing Ferrite/Pearlite Banding and Origin of Large Pearlite Nodules in a Hypoeutectoid Plate Steel,” Mat. Sci. Tech., 8 (1992), pp. 777–784.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Grossterlinden et al., “Formation of Pearlite Banded Structures in Ferrite-Pearlite Steels,” Steel Research, 63 (1992), pp. 331–336.

  29. P.T. Craddock, “Cast Iron, Fined Iron, Crucible Steel: Liquid Iron in the Ancient World,” Prehistory of Mining and Extractive Metallurgy, ed. P.T. Craddock and J. Lang (London: British Museum, in press).

  30. H. Maryon, “Pattern Welding and Damascening of Sword Blades Part 2,” J. of Intern. Inst. for Conservation of Hist. and Art. Works, 5 (1960), pp. 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verhoeven, J.D., Pendray, A.H. & Dauksch, W.E. The key role of impurities in ancient damascus steel blades. JOM 50, 58–64 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-998-0419-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-998-0419-y

Keywords

Navigation