Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

Increasing numbers of people survive cancer beyond diagnosis and treatment. Many survivors have ongoing needs and they may encounter fragmented, poorly coordinated follow up care. Survivorship care plans (SCP) have been promoted as a key aspect of survivorship care. This study aimed to survey key stakeholders in the care of people with colorectal cancer (survivors, primary care providers and hospital-based healthcare professionals) regarding follow-up and SCP.

Patients and methods

In study 1, cancer survivors completed a questionnaire regarding their follow-up and experiences during survivorship. Participants’ primary care physicians completed a phone interview regarding proposed SCP elements. A subgroup of survivors reviewed a sample SCP and participated in a phone interview regarding this. In study 2, healthcare professionals working with colorectal cancer patients completed a questionnaire regarding follow-up and proposed elements of a SCP.

Main results

Twenty survivors completed the questionnaire, 14 primary care providers completed a phone interview and 12 survivors reviewed the sample SCP.

Ninety-five healthcare professionals (30 medical professionals and 65 nurses) completed the questionnaire. There was strong support for core elements of the SCP. Additionally, nurses and survivors expressed support for supportive care and psychosocial elements. There was lack of consensus regarding who should prepare and discuss the SCP.

Conclusions

There is strong support for the development and use of SCPs for bowel cancer survivors. There is some variation in opinion regarding ideal content of the SCP, who might prepare it, and how it might be discussed and utilised.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Overcoming identified barriers to implementing SCPs for bowel cancer survivors is necessary for high quality cancer care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erikson C, Salsberg E, Forte G, Bruinooge S, Goldstein M. Future supply and demand for oncologists: Challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Pract. 2007;3:79–86. doi:10.1200/JOP.0723601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Institute of Health & Welfare.Cancer in Australia: an overview 2006. Cancer series no. 37. cat. no. CAN32. Canberra. 2007.

  3. Australian Institute of Health & Welfare.Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia. Cancer Series no. 42. cat. no. CAN38. Canberra. 2008.

  4. Hewitt, M.E., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E.From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in transition: National Academics Press. 2005.

  5. American Society of Clinical Oncology. (2005). Colon Cancer Surveillance J Oncol Pract, 1, 179.

  6. Ganz PA, Hahn EE. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:759–767. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P. The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer. 2000;88:226–237. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<226::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-P.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewitt ME, Ganz PA. Implementing Cancer Survivorship Care Planning: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, Harvey C. Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:2270–2273. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Warren JL, Mariotto AB, Meekins A, Topor M, Brown ML. Current and future utilization of services from medical oncologists. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:3242–3247. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:5117–5124. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:848–855. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wattchow DA, Weller DP, Esterman A, Pilotto LS, McGorm K, Hammett Z, et al. General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Cancer. 2006;94:1116–1121. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603052.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nissen MJ, Beran MS, Lee MW, Mehta SR, Pine DA, Swenson KK. Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(7):477–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jefford M, Baravelli C, Dudgeon P, Dabscheck A, Evans M, Moloney M, et al. Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:2272–2277. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Jefford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baravelli, C., Krishnasamy, M., Pezaro, C. et al. The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up. J Cancer Surviv 3, 99–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0086-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0086-1

Keywords

Navigation