Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for acute coronary syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest is associated with higher mortality and morbidity rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing surgery. Although off-pump CABG (OPCAB) is beneficial for high-risk patients, its efficacy for ACS is unknown, with on-pump beating CABG an adjunctive method. We investigated the effects of OPCAB and on-pump beating CABG for ACS.

Methods

We evaluated 121 consecutive patients with ACS (91 males, 30 females; mean age 69.5 ± 10.3 years) who underwent CABG since 2000. Seventy-five had unstable angina (UA) and 46 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [non-ST elevation (NSTEMI): 22, ST elevation (STEMI): 24]. We assessed CABG for acute coronary syndrome under our primary OPCAB strategy, and compared perioperative status between UA and AMI patients.

Results

(1) Sixty-five (87 %) with UA underwent OPCAB, 8 on-pump beating CABG, and 2 conventional CABG. Conversion from OPCAB was seen in 4 patients. In-hospital mortality was 1.3 %. (2) All UA patients who had intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) underwent OPCAB. No patients with preoperative IABP experienced conversion from OPCAB. (3) In AMI patients, hospital mortality was higher (8.9 %) and the ratios for OPCAB, on-pump beating CABG, and conventional CABG were 39, 57, and 4 %, respectively. Mortality was exclusively seen in patients with STEMI who underwent conventional CABG.

Conclusions

OPCAB might have beneficial effects for ACS patients with UA, while IABP was found essential for completing OPCAB. In AMI patients, on-pump beating CABG might be reasonable for avoiding conversion from OPCAB and ischemic perfusion injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger JS, Frye CB, Harshaw Q, Edwards FH, Steinhubl SR, Becker RC. Impact of clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes requiring coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1693–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Gal Y, Moses JW, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Weisz G, Nikolsky E, et al. Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:1059–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zembala M, Trzeciak P, Gąsior M, Gierlotka M, Hudzik B, Tajstra M, et al. Optimal timing for surgical revascularization in survivors of acute coronary syndromes eligible for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Int J Cardiol. 2011;153:173–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirose H, Amano A, Takahashi A, Takanashi S. Urgent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;50:330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochi M, Hatori N, Saji Y, Sakamoto S, Nishina D, Tanaka S. Application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;9:29–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rastan AJ, Eckenstein JI, Hentschel B, Funkat AK, Gummert JF, Doll N, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for acute coronary syndrome: beating heart versus conventional cardioplegic cardiac arrest strategies. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I477–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaya K, Cavolli R, Telli A, Soyal MF, Aslan A, Gokaslan G, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a clinical analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;27(5):31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Polonski L, Gasior M, Gierlotka M, Osadnik T, Kalarus Z, Trusz-Gluza M, et al. A comparison of ST elevation versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction outcomes in a large registry database: are non-ST myocardial infarctions associated with worse long-term prognoses? Int J Cardiol. 2011;152:70–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hagl C, Khaladj N, Peterss S, Martens A, Kutschka I, Goerler H, et al. Acute treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: is there a role for the cardiac surgeon? Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1786–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaroff JG, diTommaso DG, Barron HV. A risk model derived from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 database for predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting during acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, Ting W. Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:115–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirose H, Amano A, Takahashi A. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with three-vessel disease. Surgery. 2002;132:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawamura M, Nakajima H, Kobayashi J, Funatsu T, Otsuka Y, Yagihara T, et al. Patency rate of the internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery bypass is reduced by competitive flow from the concomitant saphenous vein graft in the left coronary artery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:833–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Z, Amsterdam EA, Yeo KK, Hoegh H, Mahendra G, Boyd WD, et al. Coronary artery bypass operations for elderly patients in California, 2003 to 2008. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1167–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abu-Omar Y, Taghavi FJ, Navaratnarajah M, Ali A, Shahir A, Yu LM, et al. The impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on postoperative renal function. Perfusion. 2012;27:127–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin R, Hiratzka LF, Grunkemeier GL, Krause A, Page US 3rd. Aborted off-pump coronary artery bypass patients have much worse outcomes than on-pump or successful off-pump patients. Circulation. 2005;112(9 Suppl):I332–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyahara K, Matsuura A, Takemura H, Saito S, Sawaki S, Yoshioka T, et al. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction has lower mortality and morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:521–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Funkat AK, Beckmann A, Lewandowski J, Frie M, Schiller W, Ernst M, Hekmat K, et al. Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2011: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;60:371–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shroyer AL, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Eiken MC, DeLong ER, Chen A, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1856–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Paolasso E, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(16):1489–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Niranjan G, Asimakopoulos G, Karagounis A, Cockerill G, Thompson M, Chandrasekaran V. Effects of cell saver autologous blood transfusion on blood loss and homologous blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on- versus off-cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomised trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:271–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wan S, Izzat MB, Lee TW, Wan IY, Tang NL, Yim AP. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel CABG reduces cytokine response and myocardial injury. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:52–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marui A, Kimura T, Tanaka S, Okabayashi H, Komiya T, Furukawa Y, et al. Comparison of frequency of postoperative stroke in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1773–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Golding LA, Loop FD, Peter M, Cosgrove DM, Taylor PC, Phillips DF. Late survival following use of intraaortic balloon pump in revascularization operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1980;30:48–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, Barton BA, Webster TR, Mattera JA, et al. Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2308–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tomasco B, Cappiello A, Fiorilli R, Leccese A, Lupino R, Romiti A, et al. Surgical revascularization for acute coronary insufficiency: analysis of risk factors for hospital mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:678–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B. Early and late outcome after CABG in patients with evolving myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11:848–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson CR, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, Antonelli TA, Webb JG, Jaber WA, et al. Cardiogenic shock due to acute severe mitral regurgitation complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we use emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1104–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perrault LP, Menasché P, Peynet J, Faris B, Bel A, de Chaumaray T, et al. On-pump, beating-heart coronary artery operations in high-risk patients: an acceptable trade-off? Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1368–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiki Sawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishi, H., Sakaguchi, T., Miyagawa, S. et al. Optimal coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for acute coronary syndrome. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62, 357–363 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0358-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-013-0358-6

Keywords

Navigation