Skip to main content
Log in

Measurements of the contact force from myenteric contractions on a solid bolus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of robotic capsule endoscopes (RCEs) is one avenue presently investigated by multiple research groups to minimize invasiveness and enhance outcomes of enteroscopic procedures. Understanding the biomechanical response of the small bowel to RCEs is needed for design optimization of these devices. In previous work, the authors developed, characterized, and tested the migrating motor complex force sensor (MFS), a novel sensor for quantifying the contact forces per unit of axial length exerted by the myenteron on a solid bolus. This work is a continuation, in which the MFS is used to quantify the contractile strength in the small intestine proximal, middle, and distal regions of five live porcine models. The MFSs are surgically implanted in a generally anesthetized animal, and force data from 5 min of dwell time are analyzed. The mean myenteric contact force from all porcine models and locations within the bowel is 1.9 ± 1.0 N cm−1. Examining the results based on the small bowel region shows a statistically significant strengthening trend in the contractile force from proximal to middle to distal with mean forces of 1.2 ± 0.5, 1.9 ± 0.9, and 2.3 ± 1.0 N cm−1, respectively (mean ± one standard deviation). Quantification of the contact force against a solid bolus provides developers of RCEs with a valuable, experimentally derived parameter of the intraluminal environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leighton JA, Legnani P, Seidman EG (2007) Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: where we are and where we are going. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13:331–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Upchurch BR, Vargo JJ (2008) Small bowel enteroscopy. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 8:169–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Phee L, Accoto D, Menciassi A, Stefanini C, Carrozza MC, Dario P (2002) Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract. Biomed Eng, IEEE Trans on 49:613–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Quirini M, Menciassi A, Scapellato S, Dario P, Rieber F, Ho C-N, Schostek S, Schurr MO (2008) Feasibility proof of a legged locomotion capsule for the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 67:1153–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Glass P, Cheung E, Sitti M (2008) A legged anchoring mechanism for capsule endoscopes using micropatterned adhesives. Biomed Eng, IEEE Transact on 55:2759–2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang K, Yan G, Ma G, Ye D (2009) An earthworm-like robotic endoscope system for human intestine: design, analysis, and experiment. Ann Biomed Eng 37:210–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodou D, Breedveld P, Wieringa P (2005) Friction manipulation for intestinal locomotion. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dodou D, van den Berg M, van Gennip J, Breedveld P, Wieringa PA (2008) Mucoadhesive films inside the colonic tube: performance in a three-dimensional world. J R Soc Interface 5:1353–1362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harding SE (2003) Mucoadhesive interactions. Biochem Soc Trans 31:1036–1041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sliker LJ, Wang X, Schoen JA, Rentschler ME (2010) Micropatterned treads for in vivo robotic mobility. J Med Devices 4:041006–041008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miftahof RN (2005) The wave phenomena in smooth muscle syncytia. In Silico Biol (Gedrukt) 5:479–498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mortazavi S, Smart J (1995) An investigation of some factors influencing the in vitro assessment of mucoadhesion. Int J Pharma 116:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoeg HD, Slatkin AB, Burdick JW, Grundfest WS (2000) Biomechanical modeling of the small intestine as required for the design and operation of a robotic endoscope. In: Robotics and automation, 2000. Proc ICRA’00. IEEE Int Conf, San Francisco, pp 1599–1606

  14. Higa M, Luo Y, Okuyama T, Takagi T (2007) Characterization of the passive mechanical properties of large intestine. Int J Appl Electromagnet Mech 25:595–599

    Google Scholar 

  15. Macagno EO, Christensen J (1980) Fluid mechanics of the duodenum. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 12:139–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciarletta P, Dario P, Tendick F, Micera S (2009) Hyperelastic model of anisotropic fiber reinforcements within intestinal walls for applications in medical robotics. Int J Robot Res 28:1279–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Egorov VI, Schastlivtsev IV, Prut EV, Baranov AO, Turusov RA (2002) Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. J Biomech 35:1417–1425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jørgensen CS, Assentoft JE, Knauss D, Gregersen H, Briggs GAD (2001) Small intestine wall distribution of elastic stiffness measured with 500 MHz scanning acoustic microscopy. Ann Biomed Eng 29:1059–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Terry BS, Lyle AB, Schoen JA, Rentschler ME (2011) Preliminary mechanical characterization of the small bowel for in vivo robotic mobility. ASME J Biomech Eng 133(9):091010–091017

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samsom M, Smout AJPM, Hebbard G, Fraser R, Omari T, Horowitz M, Dent J (1998) A novel portable perfused manometric system for recording of small intestinal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 10:139–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clinton Texter E (1968) Pressure and transit in the small intestine. Dig Dis Sci 13:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miftahof R, Akhmadeev N (2007) Dynamics of intestinal propulsion. J Theor Biol 246:377–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miftahof R, Fedotov E (2005) Intestinal propulsion of a solid non-deformable bolus. J Theor Biol 235:57–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Terry BS, Schoen JA, Rentschler ME (2012) Characterization and experimental results of a novel sensor for measuring the contact force from myenteric contractions. IEEE Transact Biomed Eng

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Clinical and Translational Research Center at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CTRC) for assistance with the statistical analysis. This work was funded in part by a Junior Faculty Pilot Award from the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI). This publication was supported by NIH/NCRR Colorado CTSI Grant no. UL1 RR025780. Its contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH view.

Conflict of interest

Drs. Schoen and Rentschler, and Mr. Terry have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin S. Terry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terry, B.S., Schoen, J.A. & Rentschler, M.E. Measurements of the contact force from myenteric contractions on a solid bolus. J Robotic Surg 7, 53–57 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0346-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0346-3

Keywords

Navigation