Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-effectiveness and Budget Impact of Obesity Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Three European Countries(II)

  • Other
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to establish a payer-perspective cost-effectiveness and budget impact model of adjustable gastric banding (AGB) and gastric bypass (GBP) vs. conventional treatment (CT) in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg.m−2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Austria, Italy, and Spain.

Methods

A health economics model described in a previous publication was applied to resource utilization and cost data in AGB, GBP, and CT from Austria, Italy, and Spain in 2009.

Results

The base case time scope is 5 years; the annual discount rate for utilities and costs is 3.5%. In Austria and Italy, both AGB and GBP are cost-saving and are thus dominant in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared to CT. In Spain, AGB and GBP yield a moderate cost increase but are cost-effective, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of 30,000 euro per quality adjusted life-year. Under worst-case analysis, AGB and GBP remain cost-saving or around breakeven in Austria and Italy and remain cost-effective in Spain.

Conclusion

In patients with T2DM and BMI ≥ 35 kg.m−2 at 5-year follow-up vs. CT, AGB and GBP are not only clinically effective and safe but represent satisfactory value for money from a payer perspective in Austria, Italy, and Spain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABG:

Adjustable gastric banding

BI:

Budget impact

CT:

Conventional treatment

DRG:

Diagnostic-related group

EQ-5D:

EuroQol three-level five-dimensional

GBP:

Gastric bypass

HTA:

Health technology assessment

LKF:

Leistungsorientierte Krankenanstaltenfinanzierung: the point-based Austrian service-based hospital funding

ICER:

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

QALYs:

Quality adjusted life-years

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

WTP:

Willingness to pay: the maximum ICER accepted by health care payers

References

  1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of surgery to aid weight reduction for people with morbid obesity. Technology appraisal—guidance no. 46. 2002.

  2. Buchwald H, Avido Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ackroyd R, Mouiel J, Chevallier JM, et al. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of obesity surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes in three European countries. Obes Surg. 2006;16(11):1488–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jönsson B. Revealing the cost of type-2 diabetes in Europe. Diabetologia. 2002;45:S5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moreno O, Meoro A, Martinez A, et al. Comparison of two low-calorie diets: a prospective study of effectiveness and safety. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29(7):633–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ministero del Lavoro della Salute e delle Politiche Soziali. Centro Nazionale per la Prevenzione e il Controllo delle Malattie. Evidence-based prevention. EBP e obesita. Direct link to NICE. 2009. website. https://doi.org/www.ccm-network.it/ebp_e_obesita/enti_istituti.

  7. Corbella A. Linee Guida Nice (National Institute For Clinical Excellence) NHS (National Health Service) Servizio Sanitario Nazionale Inglese Titolo: Cadute: La Valutazione E La Prevenzione Delle Cadute Nelle Persone Anziane. Lineeguida Cliniche N. 21. Unità di gestione del rischio dell'ASL 3 Genovese. https://doi.org/www.gestionerischio.asl3.liguria.it/pdf/traduzione%20linee%20guida%20nice2.pdf. 2004.

  8. Razdik D. U.O di Pediatria Ospedale di Castelfranco Veneto (TV). Analisi Critica Delle Linee Guida Sull’uso Dei Distanziatori Nell’asma Bronchiale Infantile Società Italiana di Immunologia e Allergologia Pediatrica (SIAIP); https://doi.org/www.siaip.it/atom/atom/allegato/207.pdf. 2007.

  9. Clegg AJ, Colquitt J, Sidhu MK et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery for people with morbid obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. The National Coordinating Center for Health Technology Assessment (SPAIN). 2002.

  10. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. 2004.

  11. HM Treasury. The green book, annex 6. http://greenbook.treasury.gov.uk/annex06.htm. 2003.

  12. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. Reference N1618. www.nice.org.uk. 2008.

  13. Iannazzo S, Zaniolo O, Pradelli L. Economic evaluation of treatment with Orlistat in Italian obese patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(1):63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. STATISTIK AUSTRIA—Gesundheitsausgaben. Gesundheitsausgaben in Österreich laut System of Health Accounts (OECD) 1 1990–2006, in Mio. EUR. Öffentliche Gesundheitsausgaben, insgesamt. https://doi.org/www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/gesundheit/gesundheitsausgaben/019701.html.

  15. Steiermärkische Gebietskrankenkasse, DI Fritz Bruner. Presentation at health-connex 06, October 9–11 2006.

  16. Dorner T, Rathmanner T, Lechleitner M, et al. Public health aspects of diabetes mellitus—epidemiology, prevention strategies, policy implications: the First Austrian Diabetes Report. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006;118(17–18):513–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. García-Altés A. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona. Fundación Instituto de Investigación en Servicios de Salud. Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research (CAHTA). Newsletter, Issue 38, January 2006.

  18. Oliva J, Lobo F, Molina B, et al. Direct health care costs of diabetic patients in Spain. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(11):2616–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support by Ethicon Endo-Surgery for Excel model software development and for resource utilization collection by clinicians is acknowledge.

Conflict of Interest Statements

Dr. Marco Anselmino: Ethicon Endo-Surgery Consultant for Bariatric Surgery

Dr Tanja Bammer: none

Dr José Maria Fernández Cebrián: none

Dr Frederic Daoud: Consultant in clinical epidemiology to Ethicon Endo-Surgery

Dr Giuliano Romagnoli: none

Pr Antonio Torres: none

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederic Daoud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anselmino, M., Bammer, T., Fernández Cebrián, J.M. et al. Cost-effectiveness and Budget Impact of Obesity Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Three European Countries(II). OBES SURG 19, 1542–1549 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9946-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9946-z

Keywords

Navigation