Abstract
The complexities of modern science are not adequately reflected in many bioethical discussions. This is especially problematic in highly contested cases where there is significant pressure to generate clinical applications fast, as in stem cell research. In those cases a more integrated approach to bioethics, which we call systems bioethics, can provide a useful framework to address ethical and policy issues. Much as systems biology brings together different experimental and methodological approaches in an integrative way, systems bioethics integrates aspects of the history and philosophy of science, social and political theory, and normative analysis with the science in question. In this paper we outline how a careful analysis of the science of stem cell research can help to refocus the discussions related to the clinical applications of stem cells. We show how inaccurate or inadequate scientific assumptions help to create a set of unrealistic expectations and badly inform ethical deliberations and policy development. Systems bioethics offers resources for moving beyond the current impasse.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alon, U. (2003). Biological networks: The tinkerer as an engineer. Science, 301, 1866–1867.
Austriaco, N. P. G. (2002). On static eggs and dynamic embryos: A systems perspective. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 2, 659–683.
Balsam, L. B., Wagers, A. J., Christensen, J. L., Kofidis, T., Weissman I. L., & Robbins, R. C. (2004). Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature, 428, 668–673.
Baylis, F. (2002). Human cloning: Three mistakes and an alternative. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27, 319–337.
Bjerknes, M. (1994). Simple stochastic theory of stem cell differentiation is not simultaneously consistent with crypt extinction probability and the expansion of mutated clones. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 168, 349–365.
Blau, H. M., Brazelton, T. R., & Weimann, J. M. (2001). The evolving concept of a stem cell: Entity or function? Cell, 105, 829–841.
Brown, M. B. (2004). The political philosophy of science policy. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 42, 77–95.
Brown, M. B. (2006). Citizen panels and the concept of representation. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 203–225.
Davidson, E. H., Rast, J. P., Oliveri, P., Ransick, A., Calestani, C., Yuh, C.-H., et al. (2002). A genomic regulatory network for development. Science, 295, 1669–1678.
de Wert, G., & Mummery, C. (2003). Human embryonic stem cells: Research, ethics and policy. Human Reproduction, 18, 672–682.
Elliott, K. C. (2005). Developmental systems theory and human embryos: A response to Austriaco. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 5, 249–259.
Fewell, J. H. (2003). Social insect networks. Science, 301, 1667–1670.
Furusawa, C., & Kaneko, K. (2000). Origin of complexity in multicellular organisms. Physical Review Letters, 86, 6130–6133.
Geijsen, N., Horoschak, M., Kim, K., Gribnau, J., Eggan, K., & Daley, G. Q. (2004). Derivation of embryonic germ cells and male gametes from embryonic stem cells. Nature, 427, 148–154.
Green, R. M. (2002). Benefiting from ‘evil’: An incipient moral problem in human stem cell research. Bioethics, 16, 544–556.
Hardy, K., & Starck, J. (2002). Mathematical models of the balance between apoptosis and proliferation. Apoptosis, 7, 373–381.
Holm, S. (2002). Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy. Bioethics, 16, 493–507.
Hurlbut, W. B. (2005). Patenting humans: Clones, chimeras, and biological artifacts. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 21–29.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2004). Materializing research promises: Opportunities, priorities and conflicts in translational medicine. Journal of Translational Medicine, 2, 5.
Ivanova, N. B., Dimos, J. T., Schaniel, C., Hackney, J. A., Moore, K. A., & Lemischka, I. R. (2002). A stem cell molecular signature. Science, 298, 601–604.
Kai, T., & Spradling, A. (2004). Differentiating germ cells can revert into functional stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries. Nature, 428, 564–569.
Kitano, H., (Ed.) (2001). Foundations of systems biology. Cambridge: MIT.
Kitano, H. (2002). Systems biology: A brief overview. Science, 295, 1662–1664.
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Komaroff, A. L., & Daley, G. Q. View from the lab: Harnessing stem cells. Newsweek. 2004 Dec. 6;144:54; available online at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6596811/site/newsweek/.
Lakatos, A., & Franklin, R. J. (2002). Transplant mediated repair of the central nervous system: An imminent solution? Current Opinion in Neurology, 15, 701–705.
Laubichler, M. D., & Wagner, G. P. (2000). Organism and character decomposition: Steps towards an integrative theory in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, S289–S300.
Loeffler, M., Birke, A., Winton, D., & Potten, C. (1993). Somatic mutation, monoclonality and stochastic models of stem cell organization in the intestinal crypt. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 160, 471–491.
Maienschein, J. (2003). Whose view of life? Embryos, cloning, and stem cells. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis: The organization of the living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 42, 59–141.
Murry, C. E., Soonpaa, M. H., Reinecke, H., Nakajima, H., Nakajima, H. O., Rubart, M., et al. (2004). Haematopoietic stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts. Nature, 428, 664–668.
National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, National Research Council. (2005). Guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research. Washington, District of Columbia: National Academies.
Neumann-Held, E. M. (1999). The gene is dead – Long live the gene! Conceptualizing genes the constructionist way. In P. Koslowski (Ed.), Sociobiology and bioeconomics: The theory of evolution in biological and economic theory (pp. 105–137). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Powell, K. (2005). Stem-cell niches: It’s the ecology, stupid! Nature, 435, 268–270.
Ramalho-Santos, M. (2004). Stem cells as probabilistic self-producing entities. BioEssays, 26, 1013–1016.
Ramalho-Santos, M., Yoon, S., Matsuzaki, Y., Mulligan, R. C., & Melton, D. A. (2002). ‘Stemness’: Transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science, 298, 597–600.
Robert, J. S. (2004). Model systems in stem cell biology. BioEssays, 26, 1005–1012.
Robert, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: Taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robert, J. S. (2006). The science and ethics of making part-human animals in stem cell biology. FASEB Journal, 20, 838–845.
Sandel, M. J. (2004). Embryo ethics: The moral logic of stem-cell research. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 207–209.
Sarewitz, D. (2004). Stepping out of line in stem cell research: Proposition 71 would cut the link between science and democracy [editorial]. The Los Angeles Times. Oct 25; Sect. B, 11.
Seaberg, R. M., & van der Kooy, D. (2003). Stem and progenitor cells: The premature desertion of rigorous definitions. Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 125–131.
Shostak, S. (2006). (Re)defining stem cells. BioEssays, 28, 301–308.
Snyder, E. Y., Daley, G. Q., & Goodell, M. (2004). Taking stock and planning for the next decade: Realistic prospects for stem cell therapies for the nervous system. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 76, 157–168.
Stadler, B. M. R., Stadler, P., Wagner, G. P., & Fontana, W. (2001). The topology of the possible: Formal spaces underlying pattern of evolutionary change. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 213, 241–274.
Steinbock, B. (2000). What does “respect for embryos” mean in the context of stem cell research? Women’s Health Issues, 10(3), 127–130, May–Jun.
Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410, 268–276.
Svendsen, C. N., & Langston, J. W. (2004). Stem cells for Parkinson disease and ALS: Replacement or protection? Nature Medicine, 10, 224–225.
Van Heyningen, V. (2000). Gene games of the future. Nature, 408, 769–771.
Varela, F. G., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization, and a model. Current Models in Biology, 5, 187–196.
Vogel, G. (2003). ‘Stemness’ genes still elusive. Science, 302, 371.
Wade, N. Tracking the uncertain science of growing heart cells. The New York Times. 2005 Mar 14; available online at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/14/health/14heart.html.
Wagner, G. P., & Laubichler, M. D. (2000). Character identification in evolutionary biology: The role of the organism. Theory in Biosciences, 119, 20–40.
Wilson, E. B. (1896). The cell in development and inheritance. New York: Macmillan.
Acknowledgments
We thank Rachel Ankeny (University of Sydney) and Mary Sunderland (Arizona State University) for initial discussions about this article, and Françoise Baylis (Dalhousie University) for contributing to an early draft. The comments of two anonymous referees for this journal were especially helpful. JM and JSR’s contributions have been informed by the Model Systems Strategic Research Network, funded by the Canadian Stem Cell Network (a member of the Networks of Centres of Excellence program). JSR has also benefited from a seed grant provided by the Institute for Humanities Research at Arizona State University. Each of the three authors contributed equally to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robert, J.S., Maienschein, J. & Laubichler, M.D. Systems Bioethics and Stem Cell Biology. Bioethical Inquiry 3, 19–31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-006-9001-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-006-9001-x