Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Polypharmacy and Risk of Antiretroviral Drug Interactions Among the Aging HIV-Infected Population

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Among aging HIV-infected adults, polypharmacy and its consequences have not been well-described.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the extent of polypharmacy and the risk of antiretroviral (ARV) drug interactions among persons of different ages.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional analysis among patients within the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) cohort who were prescribed ARVs during 2006–2010.

MAIN MEASURES

We used the University of Liverpool HIV drug interactions database to identify ARV/non-ARV interactions with potential for clinical significance.

KEY RESULTS

Of 3,810 patients analyzed (median age 46 years, 34 % ≥ 50 years old) at midpoint of observation, 1,494 (39 %) patients were prescribed ≥ 5 non-ARV medications: 706 (54 %) of 1,312 patients ≥ 50 years old compared with 788 (32 %) of 2,498 patients < 50 years. During the five-year period, the number of patients who were prescribed at least one ARV/non-ARV combination that was contraindicated or had moderate or high evidence of interaction was 267 (7 %) and 1,267 (33 %), respectively. Variables independently associated with having been prescribed a contraindicated ARV/non-ARV combination included older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 10 years of age 1.17, 95 % CI 1.01–1.35), anxiety (aOR 1.78, 95 % CI 1.32–2.40), dyslipidemia (aOR 1.96, 95 % CI 1.28–2.99), higher daily non-ARV medication burden (aOR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.10–1.17), and having been prescribed a protease inhibitor (aOR 2.10, 95 % CI 1.59–2.76). Compared with patients < 50 years, older patients were more likely to have been prescribed an ARV/non-ARV combination that was contraindicated (unadjusted OR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.14–1.82), or had moderate or high evidence of interaction (unadjusted OR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.15–1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial percentage of patients were prescribed at least one ARV/non-ARV combination that was contraindicated or had potential for a clinically significant interaction. As HIV-infected patients age and experience multiple comorbidities, systematic reviews of current medications by providers may reduce risk of such exposures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Crum NF, Riffenburgh RH, Wegner S, et al. Comparisons of causes of death and mortality rates among HIV-infected persons: analysis of the pre-, early, and late HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) eras. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41(2):194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krentz HB, Cosman I, Lee K, Ming JM, Gill MJ. Pill burden in HIV infection: 20 years of experience. Antivir Ther. 2012;17(5):833–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Katlama C, et al. Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study. Lancet. 2003;362(9377):22–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palella FJ, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(13):853–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Volberding PA, Deeks SG. Antiretroviral therapy and management of HIV infection. Lancet. 2010;376(9734):49–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. CDC 2012: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2010; vol. 22. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/. Published March 2012. Accessed June 5, 2012.

  7. Brooks JT, Buchacz K, Gebo KA, Mermin J. HIV Infection and Older Americans: The Public Health Perspective. 2012;102:1516–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jyrkka J, Vartiainen L, Hartikainen S, Sulkava R, Enlund H. Increasing use of medicines in elderly persons: a five-year follow-up of the Kuopio 75 + Study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62(2):151–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Linjakumpu T, Hartikainen S, Klaukka T, Veijola J, Kivelä SL, Isoaho R. Use of medications and polypharmacy are increasing among the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(8):809–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barat I, Andreasen F, Damsgaard EM. Drug therapy in the elderly: what doctors believe and patients actually do. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51(6):615–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Franceschi M, Scarcelli C, Niro V, et al. Prevalence, clinical features and avoidability of adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to a geriatric unit: a prospective study of 1,756 patients. Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):545–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Kouladjian L, Hilmer SN. Deprescribing trials: methods to reduce polypharmacy and the impact on prescribing and clinical outcomes. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28(2):237–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin CF, Wang CY, Bai CH. Polypharmacy, aging and potential drug-drug interactions in outpatients in Taiwan: a retrospective computerized screening study. Drugs Aging. 2011;28(3):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Secoli SR, Figueras A, Lebrão ML, de Lima FD, Santos JL. Risk of potential drug-drug interactions among Brazilian elderly: a population-based, cross-sectional study. Drugs Aging. 2010;27(9):759–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamura BK, Bell CL, Inaba M, Masaki KH. Outcomes of polypharmacy in nursing home residents. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28(2):217–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchacz K, Baker RK, Palella FJ, Jr., et al. Disparities in prevalence of key chronic diseases by gender and race/ethnicity among antiretroviral-treated HIV-infected adults in the US. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(1):65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hasse B, Ledergerber B, Furrer H, et al. Morbidity and aging in HIV-infected persons: the Swiss HIV cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(11):1130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kilbourne A, Justice A, Rabeneck L, Rodriquez-Barradas M, Weissman S. General medical and psychiatric comorbidity among HIV-infected veterans in the post-HAART era. J Clin Epi. 2001;54(12):S22–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nachega JB, Hsu AJ, Uthman OA, Spinewine A, Pham PA. Antiretroviral therapy adherence and drug-drug interactions in the aging HIV population. AIDS. 2012;26(Suppl 1):S39–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rainey PM. HIV drug interactions: the good, the bad, and the other. Ther Drug Monit. 2002;24(1):26–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Josephson F. Drug-drug interactions in the treatment of HIV infection: focus on pharmacokinetic enhancement through CYP3A inhibition. J Intern Med. 2010;268(6):530–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dresser GK, Bailey DG. A basic conceptual and practical overview of interactions with highly prescribed drugs. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;9(4):191–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guengerich FP. Cytochrome P-450 3A4: regulation and role in drug metabolism. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999;39:1–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Griffin L, Annaert P, Brouwer KL. Influence of drug transport proteins on the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of HIV protease inhibitors. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100(9):3636–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cooney D, Pascuzzi K. Polypharmacy in the elderly: focus on drug interactions and adherence in hypertension. Clin Geriatr Med. 2009;25(2):221–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haider SI, Johnell K, Thorslund M, Fastbom J. Trends in polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions across educational groups in elderly patients in Sweden for the period 1992–2002. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;45(12):643–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hohl CM, Dankoff J, Colacone A, Afilalo M. Polypharmacy, adverse drug-related events, and potential adverse drug interactions in elderly patients presenting to an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(6):666–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hovstadius B, Hovstadius K, Astrand B, Petersson G. Increasing polypharmacy - an individual-based study of the Swedish population 2005-2008. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010;10:16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ibrahim IA, Kang E, Dansky KH. Polypharmacy and possible drug-drug interactions among diabetic patients receiving home health care services. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2005;24(1–2):87–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnell K, Klarin I. The relationship between number of drugs and potential drug-drug interactions in the elderly: a study of over 600,000 elderly patients from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Drug Saf. 2007;30(10):911–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nobili A, Licata G, Salerno F, et al. Polypharmacy, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality among elderly patients in internal medicine wards. The REPOSI study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(5):507–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosholm JU, Bjerrum L, Hallas J, Worm J, Gram LF. Polypharmacy and the risk of drug-drug interactions among Danish elderly. A prescription database study. Dan Med Bull. 1998;45(2):210–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Slabaugh SL, Maio V, Templin M, Abouzaid S. Prevalence and risk of polypharmacy among the elderly in an outpatient setting: a retrospective cohort study in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy. Drugs Aging. 2010;27(12):1019–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gianotti N, Galli L, Bocchiola B, et al. Number of daily pills, dosing schedule, self-reported adherence and health status in 2010: a large cross-sectional study of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med. 2013;14(3):153–60.

  35. Marzolini C, Elzi L, Gibbons S, et al. Prevalence of comedications and effect of potential drug-drug interactions in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Antivir Ther. 2010;15(3):413–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Marzolini C, Back D, Weber R, et al. Ageing with HIV: medication use and risk for potential drug-drug interactions. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):2107–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Viktil KK, Blix HS, Moger TA, Reikvam A. Polypharmacy as commonly defined is an indicator of limited value in the assessment of drug-related problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(2):187–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5(4):345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002;106(25):3143–3421.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hsyu PH, Schultz-Smith MD, Lillibridge JH, Lewis RH, Kerr BM. Pharmacokinetic interactions between nelfinavir and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors atorvastatin and simvastatin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(12):3445–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams D, Feely J. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug interactions with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(5):343–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/adultandadolescentgl.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2013.

  43. Kauffman Y, Nair V, Herist K, Thomas V, Weidle PJ. HIV medication therapy management services in community pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2012;52(6):e287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Baysari MT, Westborrk J, Braithwaite J, et al. The role of computerized decision support in reducing errors in selecting medicines for prescription. Drug Saf. 2011;34(4):289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions of this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Funders

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) supported the HOPS data collection through a contract with the Cerner Corporation. The co-authors from the CDC participated in the design of the study and the analysis and interpretation of the data and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Prior presentations

This manuscript was presented at the XIX International AIDS Conference in Washington DC, USA on July 24th, 2012.

Conflict of Interest

The authors state that they have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Holtzman PharmD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holtzman, C., Armon, C., Tedaldi, E. et al. Polypharmacy and Risk of Antiretroviral Drug Interactions Among the Aging HIV-Infected Population. J GEN INTERN MED 28, 1302–1310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2449-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2449-6

KEY WORDS

Navigation