Abstract
This article reviews the medical and surgical modalities for the treatment of esophageal achalasia. It compares and critically analyzes the short- and long-term outcomes of pneumatic dilatation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Today, laparoscopic Heller myotomy is considered in most centers to be the procedure of choice for the treatment of achalasia. Nevertheless, the success of either procedure is based on the careful selection of the patients and on the surgeon’s and gastroenterologist’s level of expertise.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stefanidis D, Richardson W, Farrell TM et al. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 2012;26:296–311.
Patti MG, Fisichella PM, Perretta S et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of esophageal achalasia::a decade of change. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:698–705.
Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1807–1816.
Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1526–1533
Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010;42:265–271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allaix, M.E., Patti, M.G. What is the Best Primary Therapy for Achalasia: Medical or Surgical Treatment? Who Owns Achalasia?. J Gastrointest Surg 17, 1547–1549 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2252-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2252-z