Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimizing the allocation of fast charging infrastructure along the German autobahn

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The allocation of fast charging stations is a severe investment for the future mobility system with electric vehicles. The allocation of the first charging stations influences the profitability of all other fast charging stations and should therefore be perfectly arranged. Hence, we applied and extended the flow-refueling location model (FRLM) developed by Capar et al. (Eur J Oper Res 227(1):142–151, 2013) to the German autobahn with a focus on the states Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria with 595 nodes and 3569 highway km. Our model extension comprehends mainly the inclusion of the access distance for traffic participants to their closest network node. In order to analyze the impact of different vehicle ranges and the desired coverage of flows we defined four scenarios. The results indicate the significance of vehicle range and the desired coverage value. 20 optimally allocated fast charging stations along the highways lead already to a coverage of about 62 % (100 km vehicle range) or even 83 % (150 km vehicle range) of all trips. A complete coverage of trips requires at least 50 (150 km vehicle range), 77 (100 km vehicle range) or even 84 (70 km vehicle range) fast charging stations. The last 30 % coverage leads to a tripling of charging stations. Furthermore, a first estimation of the corresponding surcharge for fixed costs per charging process amounts to about 20 % of the total costs for a charging process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.bbr.bund.de/.

  2. For the maps the website http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ is used.

  3. We applied a sensitivity analysis with alternative values for EV market penetration (e.g. 400,000) and fixed costs per charging station (e.g. 100,000 euros) and derived average costs within the same range (e.g. 0.99 euros).

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all participants of the workshop “Sustainability and Decision Making” at the RWTH Aachen in February 2015, especially Grit Walther, for fruitful discussions and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Jochem.

Appendix

Appendix

Assumptions for the costs calculation in Sect. 4.4.

 

Explanation

Sources and calculations

Value

Unit

Uncertainty level

1.

Total number of electric vehicles (EV) in 2020

Plötz (2014c)

500,000

No. of EV

Very high

2.

Total number of passenger cars in Germany 2014

Kraftfahrtbundesamt

44,000,000

No. of passenger cars

Almost sure

3.

Total vehicle trips per day with a distance >80 km in Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria (BWB)

OD-Data with the assumption that the total amount of cars in 2020 will be the same as in 2014

767,123

No. of vehicle trips per day

Moderate

4.

EV trips per day with a distance >80 km in BWB in 2020

L1/L2*L3

8717

No. of EV trips per day

Moderate (result)

5.

Assumption on the share of main fast charging technology (e.g., CCS) used by EV in 2020

Assumption

85 %

percentage

Moderate

6.

EV trips per day with a distance >80 km in BWB with CCS in 2020

L4*L5

7410

No. EV trips/day

Moderate (result)

7.

Average distance of roundtrips >80 km in BWB

OD-Data

300

km

Moderate

8.

Average number of charges needed for an average 300 km trip

Assumption

2.5

No. of charges/trip

Moderate

9.

Average number of charges per day in BWB

L6*L8

18,524

No. of charges/day

Moderate (result)

10.

Percentage of flows covered

Assumption from paper

80 %

percantage

Moderate

11.

Average number of charges per day in BWB with a coverage of 80 % (demand)

L9*L10

14,819

No. of charges/day

Moderate (result)

12.

Required No. of charging stations to cover 80 % of all EV flows in BWB

Result from model

34

No. of charging stations

High (result)

13.

Average number of charges per charging station per day in BWB (demand)

L11/L12

436

No. of charges/charging station

Moderate (result)

14.

Maximum possible charges per charging point per day

(60 min/h)/(20 min/charge)*24 h/day

72

No. of charges/charging point

High

15.

Optimistic charges per charging point per day (25 % workload)

Assumption

18

No. of charges/charging point

High

16.

Required number of charging points per charging station

L13/L15

24

No. of charging points/charging station

High (result)

17.

Average cost for one charging point

ABB/Elektromobilität verbindet

30,000

€ per charging point

Moderate

18.

Fix cost for one charging station

Elektromobilität verbindet

30,000

€ per charging station

Moderate

19.

Cost estimation for 80 % coverage

(L16*L17 + L18)*L12

25,719,045

High (result)

20.

Linear depreciation for 6 years for one station

L19/(L12*6)

126,074

€ per year and charging station

High (result)

21.

Maintenance costs per month

Assumption

1000

€ per month and charging station

Moderate

22.

Cost per day

(L20/365) + (L21/30)

379

€ per day and charging station

High (result)

23.

Fix cost percentage per charging process

L22/L13

0.87

€ per charging process

High (result)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jochem, P., Brendel, C., Reuter-Oppermann, M. et al. Optimizing the allocation of fast charging infrastructure along the German autobahn. J Bus Econ 86, 513–535 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0781-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0781-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation