Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of HIV Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Testing Frequency among Sexually Active Men Who Have Sex with Men, Aged 18–64 Years—New York City, 2002

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Population-based estimates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence and risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) are valuable for HIV prevention planning but not widely available, especially at the local level. We combined two population-based data sources to estimate prevalence of diagnosed HIV infection, HIV-associated risk-behaviors, and HIV testing patterns among sexually active MSM in New York City (NYC). HIV/AIDS surveillance data were used to determine the number of living males reporting a history of sex with men who had been diagnosed in NYC with HIV infection through 2002 (23% of HIV-infected males did not have HIV transmission risk information available). Sexual behavior data from a cross-sectional telephone survey were used to estimate the number of sexually active MSM in NYC in 2002. Prevalence of diagnosed HIV infection was estimated using the ratio of HIV-infected MSM to sexually active MSM. The estimated base prevalence of diagnosed HIV infection was 8.4% overall (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.5–9.6). Diagnosed HIV prevalence was highest among MSM who were non-Hispanic black (12.6%, 95% CI = 9.8–17.6), aged 35–44 (12.6%, 95% CI = 10.4–15.9), or 45–54 years (13.1%, 95% CI = 10.2–18.3), and residents of Manhattan (17.7%, 95% CI = 14.5–22.8). Overall, 37% (95% CI = 32–43%) of MSM reported using a condom at last sex, and 34% (95% CI = 28–39%) reported being tested for HIV in the past year. Estimates derived through sensitivity analyses (assigning a range of HIV-infected males with no reported risk information as MSM) yielded higher diagnosed HIV prevalence estimates (11.0–13.2%). Accounting for additional undiagnosed HIV-infected MSM yielded even higher prevalence estimates. The high prevalence of diagnosed HIV among sexually active MSM in NYC is likely due to a combination of high incidence over the course of the epidemic and prolonged survival in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Despite high HIV prevalence in this population, condom use and HIV testing are low. Combining complementary population-based data sources can provide critical HIV-related information to guide prevention efforts. Individual counseling and education interventions should focus on increasing condom use and encouraging safer sex practices among all sexually active MSM, particularly those groups with low levels of condom use and multiple sex partners

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glynn M, Rhodes P. Estimated HIV prevalence in the United States at the end of 2003. Presented at: 2005 National HIV Prevention Conference; June 12–15, 2005, Atlanta, GA.

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A Glance at the HIV/AIDS Epidemic. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005. Available at: .http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/PUBS/Facts/At-A-Glance.htm. Accessed on: March 15, 2005.

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Prevalence Trends in Selected Populations in the United States: Results from National Serosurveillance, 1993-1997. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2001:1–51.

  4. Valleroy LA, MacKellar DA, Karon JM, et al. HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men. JAMA. 2000;284:198–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koblin BA, Torian LV, Guilin V, et al. High prevalence of HIV infection among young men who have sex with men in New York City. AIDS. 2000;14:1793–1800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV incidence among young men who have sex with men—seven U.S. cities, 1994–2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:440–444.

    Google Scholar 

  7. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. HIV prevalence and risk factors among men who have sex with men in New York City: Results from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS). Available at: http://home2.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/dires/msm_riskbehavior_102105.pdf. Accessed on: August 22, 2006.

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors-United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: Men who have sex with men, November 2003–April 2005. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;SS06:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. HIV Surveillance and Epidemiology Program quarterly report, July 2003. Vol. 1, No. 4. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/dires/qtr4-2003.pdf. Accessed on: March 20, 2005.

  10. Nash D, Katyal M, Shah S. Trends in predictors of death due to HIV-related causes among persons living with AIDS in New York City: 1993–2001. J Urban Health. 2005;82:584–600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nash D, Bennani Y, Ramaswamy C, et al. Estimates of HIV incidence among persons testing for HIV using the sensitive/less sensitive enzyme immunoassay, New York City, 2001. JAIDS. 2005;39:102–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Implementation of named HIV reporting-New York City, 2001. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;52:1248–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  13. New York City Department of City Planning, Population Division, Demographic tables. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/census/demo_tables.html. Accessed on: March 15, 2005.

  14. Fleming P, Byers RH, Sweeney PA, et al. HIV prevalence in the United States, 2000. Presented at: 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2002; Seattle, Washington.

  15. Torian LV, Makki H, Menzies IB, et al. HIV infection in men who have sex with men, New York City Department of Health sexually transmitted disease clinics, 1990–1999: a decade of serosurveillance finds that racial disparities and associations between HIV and gonorrhea persist. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:73–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increases in fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrheoae among men who have sex with men-United States, 2003, and revised recommendations for gonorrhea treatment, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:335–338.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Primary and secondary syphilis among men who have sex with men-New York City, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:853–856.

    Google Scholar 

  18. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Press Release, February 2, 2005. Two New York City residents diagnosed with rare sexually transmitted infection; same strain found in Europe. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/public/press05/pr011-05.html. Accessed on: April 20, 2005.

  19. Paz-Bailey G, Meyers A, Blank S, et al. A case-control study of syphilis among men who have sex with men in New York City: association with HIV infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:581–587.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Testing Survey, 2002. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Special Report - Number 5. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2004spec_no5/default.htm. Accessed on: April 20, 2005.

  21. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. HIV Surveillance and Epidemiology Program quarterly report, July 2003. Vol. 1 No. 3. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/dires/qtr3-2003.pdf. Accessed on: April 20, 2005.

  22. Kellerman SE, Lehman JS, Lansky A, et al. HIV testing within at-risk populations in the United States and the reasons for seeking or avoiding HIV testing. JAIDS. 2002;31:202–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adoption of protective behaviors among persons with recent HIV infection and diagnoses-Alabama, New Jersey, and Tennessee, 1997–1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49:512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lau JTF, Tsui HY, Wang QS. Effects of two telephone survey methods on the level of reported risk behaviors. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:325–331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Incorporating HIV prevention into the medical care of persons living with HIV: recommendations of CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52 (No. RR-12):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan E. Manning MD, MPH.

Additional information

At the time this work was conducted, Manning and Marx were with the Epidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Thorpe, Ramaswamy, Hajat, Marx, Karpati, Mostashari, and Pfeiffer are with the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA; Nash is with the Department of Epidemiology and International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; Manning is with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Family and Community Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manning, S.E., Thorpe, L.E., Ramaswamy, C. et al. Estimation of HIV Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Testing Frequency among Sexually Active Men Who Have Sex with Men, Aged 18–64 Years—New York City, 2002. J Urban Health 84, 212–225 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9135-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9135-5

Keywords

Navigation