Skip to main content
Log in

Couple Types, Ethnicity and Marital Satisfaction in Malaysia

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify couple types and investigate the effects of couples types and ethnicity on marital satisfaction in Malaysia. A nation-wide survey involving one thousand married respondents was conducted. Using Fitzpatrick’s (1988) typology, four types of marriages were identified through cluster analysis, which included Traditional, Independent, Separate and Mixed couples. The main effect of couple types, ethnicity and effects of their interaction were found to have contributed significantly towards marital satisfaction. Malay respondents were most satisfied as Traditionals, while Chinese and Indian respondents were most satisfied as Independents. Results are discussed with reference to the current socio-cultural context of Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, A. (1996). Work-family conflict among married professional women in Malaysia. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(5), 663–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. D., & Olson, D. H. (2001). Five types of African-American marriages. Journal of Marital and Family, 27(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuber, J. F., & Harroff, P. (1965). The significant Americans: A study of sexual behaviour among the affluent. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, F. C. (1997). Aging and marriage: Understanding long-term after life marriage. In W. K. Halford & H. J. Markman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of marriages and couples interventions (pp. 255–269). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, R. I. (2010). An examination of love and marital satisfaction in long-term marriages. Dissertation Abstract International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 70(12-B), 7898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives: Communication in marriage. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schematas within the family: multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givertz, M., Segrin, C., & Hanzal, A. (2009). The association between satisfaction and commitment differs across marital couple types. Communication Research, 36(4), 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnilka, A. S. (2008). A study of the development of long-term marriages lasting 25 years or more. Dissertation Abstract International Section A: Humanities and Scial Sciences, 68(10-A), 4212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, L. K., & Eloy, S. V. (1992). Relational satisfaction and jealousy across marital types. Communication Reports, 5(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relational satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organization: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, T. B., & Jarvis, M. O. (2003). Hostile, volatile, avoiding, and validating couples-conflict types: an investigation of Gottman’s couple-conflict types. Personal Relationships, 10, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt, J. M. (1999). Typological differences in predicting marital happiness from oral history behaviors and imagined interactions. Communication Monographs, 66, 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Priceton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. L. (1999). Relational expectancy fulfillment as an explanatory variable for distinguishing couple types. Human Communication Research, 25(3), 420–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz, S., & Baharudin, R. (2009). Parenting style in the collectivist culture of Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, T., Hwang, J., & Deng, B. (2000). Perception and management of conflict. Intercultural Communication Studies, 5(2), 10–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lageson, V. A. (2008). A cyberfeminist utopia? Perceptions of gender and computer science among Malaysian women computer science students and faculty. Science Technology Human Values, 33(1), 005–027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., Pederson, A., Bunde, M., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Fazio, E., Mulryan, L., Hunt, S., Madsen, L., & Dzankovic, S. (2008). Objective rating of relational skills across multiple domains as predictors of marital satisfaction trajectories. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(3), 445–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mat, R., & Omar, R. (2002). Demographic trends in Malaysia with a special focus on women. Paper presented in the 20th Population Census Conference, Ulaaanbaatar, Mongolia, 19–21 June 2002.

  • McCabe, M. P. (2006). Satisfaction in marriage and committed heterosexual relationships: past, present and future. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellstrom, U. (2009). The intersection of gender, race and cultural boundaries, or why is computer science in Malaysia dominated by women. Social Studies of Science, 39(6), 885–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, A. (2000). Culture in the cockpit: Do Hofstede’s dimensions replicate? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(3), 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development (2007). Measuring and monitoring gender equality: Malaysias gender gap index. [Cited on 29th May 2011] Available from url: http://www.undp.org.my/measuring-and-monitoring-gender-equality-malaysias-gender-gap-index

  • Monthly Statistical Bulletin Malaysia, April 2011, Department of Statistics Malaysia. [Cited on 29th May 2011] Available from url: http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1167%3Aonline-publications-monthly-statistical-bulletin-malaysia-April-2011&catid=42%3Apublications&lang=en

  • Murugan, B. (2009). Relational maintenance strategies in marriages. Unpublished Master Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

  • Saabin, N. (2002). Mengendalikan Hubungan Suami Isteri [Managing relationship between husband and wives]. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Millennia Sdn. Bhd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. M., Loy, J. T. C., Gudmunson, C. G., & Cheong, W. (2009). Gender differences in marital and life satisfaction among Chinese Malaysians. Sex Roles, 60, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noller, P., & Hiscock, H. (1989). Fitzpatrick’s typology: an Australian replication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noor, N. M. (1999). Roles and women’s well being: some preliminary findings from Malaysia. Sex Roles, 41(3/4), 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noor, N. M. (2006). Work, family and women’s well being in Malaysia. Striving for a balance. Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press.

  • Olson, D., & Fowers, B. (1993). Five types of marriage: an empirical tyology based on ENRICH. Family Journal: Counselling and Theraphy for Couples and Families, 1, 196–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (Version 12). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. C., & Blanton, P. W. (1993). Marital strengths in enduring marriages. Family Relations, 42(1), 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sano, D. L. (2002). Attitude similarity and marital satisfaction in long-term African-American and Caucasian marriages. Dissertation Abstract International Section A: Humanities and Social Science, 62(8-A), 2895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanski, J. A. W. (1996). Long–term marriage conflict and longevity strategies over the life span: a qualitative study. Dissertation Abstract International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 57(6-A), 2618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. K., & Smith, G. T. (1986). Classification of marital relationships: An empirical approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Fourth Malaysia Plan. [Cited on 29th May 2011] Available from url: http://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RM4.pdf

  • West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2006). Understanding interpersonal communication: Making choice in changing times. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L., & Buston, B. G. (1986). The marriage relationship during the transition to parenthood: a review and a model. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 443–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yum, Y., & Li, H. Z. (2007). Associations among attachment styles, maintenance strategies, and relational quality across cultures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(2), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yum, Y., & Canary, D. J. (2009). Cultural differences in equity theory predictions of relational maintenance strategies. Human Communication Research, 35, 384–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zainal, N. Z. (2008). Depressive symptoms in middle-aged women in Peninsular Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 20(4), 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to record significant appreciation to Universiti Sains Malaysia for the financial support to the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasrina Mustafa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mustafa, H., Mohd Hasim, M.J., Aripin, N. et al. Couple Types, Ethnicity and Marital Satisfaction in Malaysia. Applied Research Quality Life 8, 299–317 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9200-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9200-z

Keywords

Navigation