Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental investigations and analysis on different pile load testing procedures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents experimental results of two Osterberg’s cell load tests (OLTs) and three conventional load tests (COLTs) in the same subsoil conditions on Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) piles carefully monitored during construction stages. The instrumentation along the pile shaft in all the tests allows interesting comparisons of both global behaviour and local load transfer. Significant differences in the stiffness of the soil-pile system with the different test procedures is outlined. The main differences between the two test procedures occur at the two opposite ends of the pile, as could have been expected, while the observed behaviour in the middle part of the tested piles is close for the two models. A relatively simple FEM model has been calibrated on the basis of the OLTs results. The same model is capable of accurately matching the experimental results of the COLTs, proving that the observed differences are not due to random factors. Furthermore, the same model has been used to simulate ideal load tests. Such a reliable simulation shows that both the experimental procedures are actually responsible for significant differences in the behaviour of the soil-pile system even in the simple case of a concentrated axial load. Large differences arise in terms of the stiffness of the system with the OLTs providing by far the stiffest response. Despite being intermediate between the OLT and the ILT, the COLTs provide a response of the pile-soil system, which is on the average about two times stiffer than the Ideal test, where the force applied on top of the pile does not depend on a tangible reaction system. Care should be thus taken when considering the results of such tests in the prediction of the settlement of a piled foundation. Correction factors should be applied to the experimentally observed behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. England M (2003) Bi-directional static load testing—State of art. In: Proceedings of 4th international geotechnical seminar on deep foundations on BAP, Ghent, Belgium, June 2003, pp 309–313

  2. Kraft L, Ray RP, Kagawa T (1981) Theoretical t-z curve. J Geotech Eng Div Asce 108(11):1543–1560

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Research Project 1493-6, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

  4. Lizzi F (1976) Pieux de fondation fondedile à cellule de precharge. Construction, n. 6, Paris, pp 32–38

  5. Lizzi F, Viggiani C, Vinale F (1983) Some experiences with pre-loading cells at the base of large diameter bored piles. In: Proceedings of VII Asian reg. conf. soil mech. found. eng, Haifa, pp 265–270

  6. Mancuso C, Mandolini A, Silvestri F, Viggiani C (1999) Prediction and performance of axially loaded piles under working loads. In: Lo Presti D (ed) Proceedings of II international symposium on prefailure deformation of geomaterials, Torino, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 801–808

  7. Mandolini A, Russo G, Viggiani C (2005) Pile foundations: experimental investigations, analysis and design. State of the Art Report. In: Proceedings of the sixteenth international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, vol I. Osaka, Japan, pp 123–168

  8. Osterberg JO (1984) A new simplified method for load testing drilled shafts. Found Drill 23(6) (July/August 1984, pub. Association of Drilled Shaft Contractors, ADSC, pp 9–11)

  9. Osterberg JO (1989) Breakthrough in load testing methodology. Found Drill Ed ADSC 28(8):13

  10. Osterberg JO (2001) Load testing high capacity piles. What have we learned? In: Proceedings of Vth international conference on deep foundational practice, April, 2001

  11. Poulos HG (1998) Pile testing-from the designer’s viewpoint. In: Proceedings of 2nd international statnamic seminar, Tokyo, pp 3–22

  12. Poulos HG, Carter JP, Small JC (2001) Foundations and retaining structures—research and practice, vol 4. In: Proceedings of XV ICSMGE, Istanbul, pp 2527–2606

  13. Randolph MF (2003) Science and empiricism in pile foundations design. Géotechnique 53(10):847–875

  14. Russo G (2004) Full scale load tests on instrumented micropiles. J Geotech Eng ICE 57(GE3):127–137

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russo G, Recinto B, Viggiani C, de Sanctis L (2003) A contribution to the analysis of Osterberg’s cell load test. In: Proceedings of 4th international geotechnical seminar on deep foundations on bored and auger piles, Ghent, Belgium, June 2003, pp 331–338

  16. Schmertmann JH (1975) Measurement of in situ shear strength. State of the art report. ASCE speciality conference on in situ measurements of soil properties, vol 2, pp 57–138

  17. Schmertmann JH, Hayes JA (1997) The Osterberg cell and bored pile testing—a symbiosis. The third international geotechnical engineering conference, Cairo, Egypt

  18. Simons MH (1961) Discussion session 3B. In: Proceedings of V ICSMFE, Paris, vol 3, pp 257–261

  19. Van Weele AF (1988) Cast in situ piles. Installation methods, soil disturbance and resulting pile behaviour. In: Proceedings of I seminar on deep foundations on bored and auger piles, Ghent, June 1988, pp 219–232

  20. Viggiani C (1989) Influenza dei fattori tecnologici nel progetto dei pali di fondazione. Panel report, Sess. 1, XVII Italian geotechnical conference, Taormina, pp 232–238

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Gianpiero Russo

Authors
  1. Gianpiero Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianpiero Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, G. Experimental investigations and analysis on different pile load testing procedures. Acta Geotech. 8, 17–31 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-012-0177-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-012-0177-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation