Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient range-free localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Node positioning is a fundamental problem in applications of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In this paper, a new range-free algorithm, called spring swarm localization algorithm (SSLA), is proposed for positioning WSNs. To determine the locations of sensor nodes, the proposed algorithm uses network topology information and a small fraction of sensor nodes which know their locations. Numerical simulations show that high positioning accuracy can be obtained by using the algorithm. Some examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Capkun S, Hamdi M, Hubaux J P. GPS-Free positioning in mobile ad-hoc networks. Cluster Comput, 2002, 5(2): 157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Girod L, Estrin D. Robust range estimation using acoustic and multimodal sensing. Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Maui, Hawaii, USA. 2001: 1312–1320

  3. Priantha N B, Chakraborty A, Balakrishnan H. The cricket location-support system. Proceeding 6th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MOBICOM), Boston, MA. 2000: 32–43

  4. Savvides A, Han C C, Srivastava M B. Dynamic finge grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. Proceeding 7th Annual Int’1 Conf on Mobile computing and Networking (MoviCom), Rome, Italy. 2001: 166–179

  5. Savvides A, Park H, Mani B, et al. The bits and flops of the N-hop multilateration primitive for node localization problems. Proceeding 1st ACM Int’1 Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Application, Atlanta, GA. 2002: 112–121

  6. Niculescu D, Nath B. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. Proceeding 22nd Annual Joint Conference the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE INFOCOM 2003). 2003: 1744–1753

  7. Priyantha N B, Miu A K L, Balakrishnan H, et al. The cricket compass for context-aware mobile applications. Proceeding of the 7th Annual Int’l Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Rome: ACM Press, 2001. 1–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahl P, Padmanabhan V N. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. Proceeding of IEEE Infocom 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2000: 775–784

  9. Girod L, Bychovskiy V, Elson J, et al. Locating tiny sensors in time and space: A case study. Proceeding of the 2002 IEEE Int’l Conf. on Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors. Freiburg: IEEE Computer Society, 2002. 214–219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Galstyan A, Krishnamachari B, Lerman K, et al. Distributed online localization in sensor networks using a moving target. Proceeding Third Internattional Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. New York: ACM Press, 2004. 61–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagpal R, Shrobe H, Bachrach J. Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an ad hoc sensor network. Proceeding in Sensor Networks: Second International Workshop, IPSN 2003, No. 2634. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Palo Alto: Springer, 2003. 333–348

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meesookho C, Mitra U, Narayanan S. On energy-based acoustic source localization for sensor network. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2008, 56(1): 365–377

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Langendoen K, Reijers N. Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: A quantitative comparison. Comput Netw, 2003, 43(4): 499–518

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheng X H, Hu Y H. Maximum likelihood multiple-source localization using acoustic energy measurements with wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2005, 53(1): 44–53

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Bulusu N, Heidemann J, Estrin D. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Pers Commun Mag, 2000, 7: 28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Doherty L. Algorithms for position and data recovery in wireless sensor networks. Masters Report, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nicolescu D, Nath B. Ad-hoc positioning systems (APS). Proceeding of the 2001 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. San Antonio: IEEE Communications Society, 2001, 5. 2926–2931

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niculescu D, Nath B. DV based positioning in ad hoc networks. J Telecommun Syst, 2003, 22: 267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. He T, Huang C, Blum B M, et al. Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks. Proceeding 9th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2003. 81–95

  20. Shang Y, Ruml W, Zhang Y, et al. Localization from mere connectivity. Proceeding of the Fourth ACM Internat. Symposium on Mobile ad hoc Networking and Computing MOBIHOC 2003. NewYork: ACM Press, 2003. 201–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim H, Hou J. Distributed localization for anisotropic sensor networks. ACM Trans Sensor Netw, 2009, 5(2): 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Doherty L, Pister K S J, Ghaoui L E. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. Proceeding of the IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Anchorage: IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2001, 3. 1655–1663

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stupp G, Sidi M. The expected uncertainty of range-free localization protocols in sensor networks. Theor Comput Sci, 2005, 344(1): 86–99

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Eren T, Goldenberg D, Whiteley W, et al. Rigidity and randomness in network localization. IEEE Infocom, 2006, 4: 2673–2684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson B D O, Belhumeur P N, Eren T, et al. Graphical properties of easily localizable sensor networks. Wirel Netw, 2009, 15(2): 177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aspnes J, Eren T, Goldenberg D K, et al. A theory of network localization. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2006, 5(12): 1663–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vincent T, Cheng K Y, Lui K S. Using micro-genetic algorithms to improve localization in wireless sensor networks. J Commun, 2006, 1(4): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nan G F, Li M Q, Li J. Estimation of node localization with a real-coded genetic algorithm in WSNs. Proceeding the Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Hong Kong, 19–22, August, 2007. 2007: 873–878

  29. Yun S, Lee J, Chung W, et al. A soft computing approach to localization in wireless sensor networks. Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36(4): 7552–7561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chuang P J, Wu C P. An effective PSO-based node localization scheme for wireless sensor networks. Proceeding 2008 Ninth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies. 2008: 187–194

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ZengRong Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, Q., Chen, F., Cai, S. et al. An efficient range-free localization algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 1053–1060 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4351-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4351-y

Keywords

Navigation