Skip to main content
Log in

Tertiärprävention des Typ-1-Diabetes

Tertiary prevention of type 1 diabetes

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Diabetologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Ansätze zur Tertiärprävention des Typ-1-Diabetes umfassen Interventionen bei oder kurz nach der Manifestation der Hyperglykämie bei bereits fortgeschrittener β-Zell-Destruktion. Ziel der Interventionen ist eine Reversion des Diabetes oder zumindest eine verlangsamte Progression durch den möglichst langfristigen Erhalt der verbleibenden β-Zell-Funktion. Hierbei werden antigengerichtete Ansätze [Behandlung mit Inselantigenen wie Glutamatdecarboxylase (GAD) oder Hitzeschockprotein-60-Peptid (DiaPep277)] von antientzündlichen Behandlungen (Interleukin-1-Rezeptorantagonist, IL-1-RA, Atorvastatin) oder immunzellgerichteten Behandlungen (Anti-CD3, Anti-CD20, Abatacept) unterschieden. Obwohl die bisherigen Studienergebnisse darauf hinweisen, dass die Aufrechterhaltung der noch vorhandenen β-Zell-Funktion prinzipiell möglich ist, hat sich bisher noch keine gesicherte Therapieform etabliert. Nachdem niedrig-dosierte Anti-CD3-Gabe und auch die Vakzinierung mit GAD nicht die erhofften Erfolge zeigten, werden die Ergebnisse aktuell laufender Phase-II/III-Studien zur Tertiärprävention durch andere Ansätze und weitere Erkenntnisse aus Studien zur Stammzelltransplantation mit Spannung erwartet.

Abstract

Tertiary prevention in patients with type 1 diabetes comprises interventions at or shortly after primary manifestation of hyperglycemia when the majority of ß-cells have already been destroyed. The interventions aim to reverse diabetes or at least to ameliorate further progression of ß-cell loss and long-term stabilization of endogenous insulin secretion capability. Antigen-directed therapy and treatment with islet antigens, such as glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) or heat shock protein 60 peptide (DiaPep277), as well as anti-inflammatory treatment with atorvastatin, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL1RA) or immune cell directed treatment (anti-CD3, anti-CD20, abatacept) are currently under investigation. Although recent studies suggest that maintaining ß-cell function is possible, there are currently no approved forms of treatment that can be recommended as standard therapy. After low dose anti-CD3 and also treatment with GAD did not show the success expected in recent phase III studies, results from ongoing phase II/III studies for tertiary prevention and further results on stem cell therapy are eagerly awaited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Aly H, Gottlieb P (2009) The honeymoon phase: intersection of metabolism and immunology. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 16:286–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cernea S, Raz I, Herold KC et al (2009) Challenges in developing endpoints for type 1 diabetes intervention studies. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 25:694–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenbarth GS (1985) Type I diabetes mellitus. A chronic autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med 314:1360–1368

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greenbaum CJ, Mandrup-Poulsen T, McGee PF et al; European C-Peptide Trial Study Group (2008) Mixed-meal tolerance test versus glucagon stimulation test for the assessment of beta-cell function in therapeutic trials in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 31:1966–1971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herold KC, Gitelman S, Greenbaum C et al; Immune Tolerance Network ITN007AI Study Group (2009) Treatment of patients with new onset type 1 diabetes with a single course of anti-CD3 mAb teplizumab preserves insulin production for up to 5 years. Clin Immunol 132:166–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huurman VA, Decochez K, Mathieu C et al (2007) Therapy with the hsp60 peptide DiaPep277 in C-peptide positive type 1 diabetes patients. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 23:269–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG et al (2005) Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 352:2598–2608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keymeulen B, Walter M, Mathieu C et al (2010) Four-year metabolic outcome of a randomised controlled CD3-antibody trial in recent-onset type 1 diabetic patients depends on their age and baseline residual beta cell mass. Diabetologia 53:614–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL (2009) Effect of glucose variability on the long-term risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:1901–1903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazar L, Ofan R, Weintrob N et al (2007) Heat-shock protein peptide DiaPep277 treatment in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind phase II study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 23:286–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ludvigsson J, Faresjö M, Hjorth M et al (2008) GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 359:1909–1920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ludvigsson J, Hjorth M, Chéramy M et al (2011) Extended evaluation of the safety and efficacy of GAD treatment of children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 54:634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandrup-Poulsen T, Pickersgill L, Donath MY (2010) Blockade of interleukin 1 in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6:158–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin S, Herder C, Schloot NC et al (2011) Residual beta cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes after treatment with atorvastatin: the Randomized DIATOR Trial. PLoS One 6:e17554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mastrandrea L, Yu J, Behrens T et al (2009) Etanercept treatment in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes: pilot randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Diabetes Care 32:1244–1249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Orban T, Bundy B, Becker DJ et al (2011) Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 378(9789):412–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer JP, Fleming GA, Greenbaum CJ et al (2004) C-peptide is the appropriate outcome measure for type 1 diabetes clinical trials to preserve beta-cell function: report of an ADA workshop, 21–22 October 2001. Diabetes 53:250–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pescovitz MD, Greenbaum CJ, Krause-Steinrauf H et al (2009) Rituximab, B-lymphocyte depletion, and preservation of beta-cell function. N Engl J Med 361:2143–2152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfleger C, Mortensen HB, Hansen L et al (2008) Association of IL-1ra and adiponectin with C-peptide and remission in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 57:929–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raz I, Elias D, Avron A et al (2001) Beta-cell function in new-onset type 1 diabetes and immunomodulation with a heat-shock protein peptide (DiaPep277): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet 358(9295):1749–1753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roep BO (2003) The role of T-cells in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes: from cause to cure. Diabetologia 46:305–321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rossetti L (2004) Glucose toxicity: effect of chronic hyperglycemia on insulin action. Diabetes mellitus: a fundamental and clinical text, 3. Aufl. Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rother KI, Brown RJ, Morales MM et al (2009) Effect of ingested interferon-alpha on beta-cell function in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:1250–1255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schloot NC, Meierhoff G, Lengyel C et al (2007) Effect of heat shock protein peptide DiaPep277 on beta-cell function in paediatric and adult patients with recent-onset diabetes mellitus type 1: two prospective, randomized, double-blind phase II trials. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 23:276–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schloot NC, Roden M, Bornstein SR, Brendel MD (2011) Recent advances in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 136:172–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sherry N, Hagopian W, Ludvigsson J et al (2011) Teplizumab for treatment of type 1 diabetes (Protégé study): 1-year results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 378(9790):487–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Steffes MW, Sibley S, Jackson M, Thomas W (2003) Beta-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care 26:832–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. The DCCT Research Group (1998) Effect of intensive therapy on residual β-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 128:517–523

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wherrett DK, Bundy B, Becker DJ et al (2011) Antigen-based therapy with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) vaccine in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 378(9788):319–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yki-Järvinen H, Koivisto VA (1986) Natural course of insulin resistance in type I diabetes. N Engl J Med 315:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zahiragic L, Schloot NC (2011) Prävention des Typ 1 Diabetes. Erste Erfolge gegen die Autoimmunität Info. Diabetologie 5:26–30

    Google Scholar 

  32. Couri CE, Oliveira MC, Stracieri AB et al (2009) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 301:1573–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Matthews JB, Staeva TP, Bernstein PL et al (2010) Developing combination immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes: recommendations from the ITN-JDRF Type 1 Diabetes Combination Therapy Assessment Group. Clin Exp Immunol 160:176–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shoda LK, Young DL, Ramanujan S et al (2005) A comprehensive review of interventions in the NOD mouse and implications for translation. Immunity 23:115–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Haller MJ, Wasserfall CH, McGrail KM et al (2009) Autologous umbilical cord blood transfusion in very young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:2041–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Wir danken Hubert Kolb für die Durchsicht des Manuskripts.

Interessenkonflikt

Die korrespondierende Autorin weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin: N.C. Schloot ist Mitarbeiterin der Fa. Lilly Deutschland und vorübergehend vom Deutschen Diabetes-Zentrum beurlaubt. Sie hat Beraterhonorare der Firmen Andromeda Rehovot, Israel, Sensile Medical, Boehringer-Ingelheim und Glaxo-Smith Cline erhalten. Sie war als Referentin für Novo Nordisk, Sanofi- Aventis und im Rahmen des Praxis Update tätig. N.C. Schloot und S. Link waren/sind an der Durchführung von klinischen Studien der Firmen Andromeda, Tolerx, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer und Roche am Deutschen Diabetes-Zentrum beteiligt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N.C. Schloot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Link, S., Schloot, N. Tertiärprävention des Typ-1-Diabetes. Diabetologe 7, 568–575 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11428-011-0729-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11428-011-0729-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation