Skip to main content
Log in

New Perspectives on Analytic Pragmatism

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analytic pragmatism is a framework of analysis elaborated by Robert Brandom, whose goal is to explain the relations between meaning and use according to a systematic and general method of inquiry. In April 2009, a workshop was organized to discuss the recent developments of this new theoretical approach. Brandom delivered three lectures, where he explored some aspects of analytic pragmatism and addressed the motivating themes of this enterprise, while the contribution from the other speakers ranged over specific aspects of the theory. This special issue is the outcome of that workshop. In this introduction we briefly outline the context of the debate and present the contribution to this issue selected from a much wider range of papers, using the reviewing process of Philosophia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cf. Brandom (2008, p. xiii) referring to Brandom (1994). The interest in Brandom’s overall theoretical enterprise is attested by recent discussions on his work by Stekeler-Weithofer (2008), Wanderer (2008), Prien and Scheikward (2008), Weiss and Wanderer (2010), and the comments on Brandom's John Locke Lectures in Minar (2008).

  2. Along the same lines, cf. also Tugendhat (1982) and Davidson (2005). A different attitude towards metaphysics is in Williamson (2007).

  3. Indeed, what Brandom says about metaphysics reflects the famous Sellarsian characterization of the aim of philosophy itself as “to understand how things in the broadest possible sense of the term hang together in the broadest possible sense of the term”. (Sellars 1963a)

  4. One can find another Sellarsian inheritance here, as for instance in connection with his nominalism about abstract entities. See Sellars (1963b).

  5. Indeed, we might add, Peirce’s general view of justificatory reasoning is a form of reflective equilibrium in a way in which Brandom’s rational update is not.

References

  • Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (2008). Between saying and doing. Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (2005). Truth and predication. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minar, E. (Ed.). (2008). On between saying and doing -Robert Brandom’s John Locke Lectures. Comments and Responses. Philosophical Topics, Volume 36, Issue 2.

  • Prien, B., & Schweikard, D. (Eds.). (2008). Robert Brandom: Analytic pragmatist. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1963a). Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In W. Sellars (Ed.), Science, perception and reality (p. 1991). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1963b). Abstract Entities, Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 16, No. 4, June 1963, reprinted in R. Brandom & K. Scharp (Eds.), In the Space of Reasons. Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2007.

  • Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (2008). The pragmatics of making it explicit. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhat, E. (1982). Traditional and analytic philosophy: Lectures on the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanderer, J. (2008). Robert Brandom. Montreal and Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, B., & Wanderer, J. (2010). Reading Brandom: On making it explicit. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Penco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santoro, D., Penco, C. New Perspectives on Analytic Pragmatism. Philosophia 40, 1–11 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-012-9360-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-012-9360-y

Keywords

Navigation