Abstract
This paper analyses whether undertaking R&D activities allows SMEs to attenuate the negative impact of recessions on productivity. In contrast to other studies we use a firm level indicator of the cycle based on firms’ own perceptions, while total factor productivity is obtained using a control function methodology in which we recognise the potential role that R&D experience might have in shaping future firms’ productivity. The analysis is performed using a representative sample of Spanish SMEs for the period 1990–2009. Results show both that R&D activities render positive productivity returns, and that performing R&D helps to alleviate the negative effects of downturns on productivity. Additionally, R&D seems to have a countercyclical effect upon SME’s productivity over the business cycle, as we find that SMEs R&D productivity premium in recessions doubles that of expansions.
Notes
SMEs account for over 78 % of the employment and 68 % of the value added of the Spanish economy (Eurostat, 2005).
Ouyang (2011) also claims that the observed pro-cyclicality of R&D is partly due to an aggregation bias.
Similar results are found by Bonha-Padilla et al. (2009) and, at industry level, in Ouyang (2011).
Moreover, R&D activities are the essence of survival since only those companies that are able to successfully innovate are able to establish and maintain a competitive advantage in the market (Audretsch and Mahmood 1995).
See http://www.fundacionsepi.es/esee/sp/pesentacion.asp for further details.
We do not use any observation for 1990, as we cannot compute productivity for this year in this survey.
Klepper (1997) in a related but different approach makes a similar point: the firms’ perception of the market might capture the way many industries evolve.
This result should be taken with caution as financial constraints are an important determinant of the relationship between R&D and the cycle, see Aghion et al. (2013), and in this regression we do not take into account whether firms are credit constrained.
The law of motion for capital follows a deterministic dynamic process according to which k it = (1 − δ)k it − 1 + I it − 1. Thus, it is assumed that the capital the firm uses in period t was actually decided in period t-1 (it takes a full production period for the capital to be ordered, received and installed by the firm before it becomes operative). Labour and materials (unlike capital) are chosen in period t, the period they actually get used (and, therefore, they can be a function of ω it ). These timing assumptions make them non-dynamic inputs, in the sense that (and again unlike capital) current choices for them have no impact on future choices.
Both the investment of capital demand function and the demand for intermediate materials are assumed to be strictly increasing in ω it (in the case of the investment of capital this is assumed in the region in which i it > 0). That is, conditional on k it , a firm with higher ω it optimally invests more (or demands more materials).
We lag this variable 2 periods to avoid potential endogeneity problems. Our main conclusions largely hold, however, if we use a dummy variable that takes value 1 if the firm performs R&D in period t-1 (rather than in period t-2). This is also the case if we use a dummy variable that takes the value 1 if the firm declares that in year t-1 (rather than in period t) its main market was in recession.
References
Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K. & Frazer, G. (2006). Structural identification of production functions, Working Paper, Department of Economics, UCLA
Ackerberg, D., L. Benkard, S. Berry & A. Pakes (2007). Econometric Tools for Analyzing Market Outcomes, in J. Heckman and E. Leamer (eds.) Handbook of Econometrics: Volume 6A, North Holland.
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.
Aghion, P., & Saint-Paul, G. (1998). Virtues of Bad times: interaction between productivity growth and economic fluctuations. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2, 322–344.
Aghion, P., Askenazy, P., Berman, N., Cette, G., & Eymard, L. (2012). Credit constraints and the cyclicality of R&D investment: evidence from France. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(5), 1001–1024.
Añón Higón, D. (2007). The Impact of R&D spillovers on UK manufacturing TFP: a dynamic panel approach. Research Policy, 36, 964–979.
Añón Higón, D., Manjón Antolín, M., & Mañez, J. A. (2011). Multinationals, R&D, and productivity: evidence for UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 641–659.
Audretsch, D. B., & Mahmood, T. (1995). New firm survival: New results using a hazard function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 97–103.
Barlevy, G. (2004). The cost of business cycles under endogenous growth. American Economic Review, 94, 964–990.
Barlevy, G. (2007). On the cyclicality of research and development. American Economic Review, 97, 1131–1164.
Basu, S. (1996). Procyclical Productivity: increasing returns or cyclical utilization? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 719–751.
Bernstein, J. (1998). The Canadian corporate tax structure and the effects on manufacturing production, cost and efficiency. Mimeo: Carleton University.
Comin, D., & Gertler, M. (2006). Medium-term business cycles. American Economic Review, 96, 523–551.
De Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia, Journal of International Economics, 73, 69–98.
De Loecker, J. (2010). A note on detecting learning by exporting. NBER Working Papers 16548, National Bureau of Economic Research
Doraszelski, U. & Jaumandreu, J. (2013). R&D and Productivity: Estimating endogenous productivity, Review of Economic Studies. DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdt011
Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1992). Cowles foundation discussion papers 1041, Cowles foundation for research in economics. Yale: University. An Alternative Theory of Firm and Industry Dynamics.
Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-perfect industry dynamics: a framework for empirical work. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 53–82.
Escribano A. & Stucchi, R (2008). Catching up in total factor productivity through the business cycle: evidence from Spanish manufacturing surveys. Economics Working Papers we085125, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía
Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.
Griliches, Z. (1980). R&D and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review, 70(2), 343–348.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.
Griliches, Z. (2000). R & D, Education, and Productivity (Vol. 214). Harvard University Press.
Guellec, D. & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2009). Policy Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 159.
Hall, R. (1991). Labor demand. Labor Supply, and Employment Volatility, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 6, 17–62.
Hall, B., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 1034–1076). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 145–181.
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317–342.
Manjón, M., Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2013). Reconsidering learning by exporting. Review of World Economics, 149(1), 5–22.
Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64, 1263–1297.
Ouyang, M. (2011). On the cyclicality of R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 542–553.
Pakes, A., & Ericson, R. (1998). Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics. Journal of Economic Theory, 79, 1–45.
Porter, M.E. & Ketels, C. (2003). UK Competitiveness – Moving to the Next Stage, DTI Economics Paper No. 3, May 2003.
Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.
Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. London: Oxford University Press.
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper and Brothers, New York (Harper Colophon edition, 1976).
Shefer, D., & Frenkel, A. (2005). R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 25(1), 25–32.
Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Sridhar, S. (2011). Should firms spend more on research and development and advertising during recessions? Journal of Marketing, 75, 49–65.
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Fang, E. (2011). The impact of economic contractions on the effectiveness of R&D and advertising: evidence from U.S. Companies spanning three decades. Marketing Science, 30, 628–645.
Van Beveren, I. (2011). Total factor productivity estimation: a practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26, 98–128.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104, 112–114.
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge financial support from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (projects ECO2011-25033, ECO2011-30323-C03-02 and SEJ2010-19088/ECON), the Generalitat Valenciana (project PROMETEO/068), and the "Xarxa de Referència d’R+D+I en Economia i Polítiques Públiques" and the SGR Programme (2009-SGR-322) of the Catalan Government. Usual disclaimers apply.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Añón-Higón, D., Manjón-Antolin, M., Mañez, J.A. et al. Does R&D protect SMEs from the hardness of the cycle? Evidence from Spanish SMEs (1990-2009). Int Entrep Manag J 11, 361–376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0329-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0329-0