Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taking the engineering path to business leadership and entrepreneurial success in Canada and USA

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cross-sectional longitudinal study of Canadian graduate engineers yielded unexpected percentages of engineers gravitating towards entrepreneurial opportunities. The aggregate of the classes of 1954, 1959, and 1964 demonstrate entrepreneurial / intrapreneurial outcomes at a rate that is many times higher than the general population. The rate is well over double the rate cited previously for engineers intending to pursue entrepreneurial outlets (Tremblay et al. 1998; Tremblay et al. 2007). This paper explores possible reasons for those findings. Existing literature is combined with a cross-sectional, longitudinal study of graduate engineers. Interpretive insight is offered from a separate exploratory study investigating the value of knowledge. Seeking to understand the high incidence of engineers gravitating to entrepreneurial opportunities, we refer to a separate study exploring potential knowledge; how knowledge is valued, and how the value of knowledge is shared between the organization and the employee. We present a framework for knowledge to be applied, or potential. Firms that saw potential knowledge in some employees recognized and captured its economic value. Instead of sharing the value generated by the knowledge with the individual, the firms indicated increasing the work load and adding responsibilities to the individual. We advance a proposition that the selection and training of engineers emphasizes potential knowledge, which is a form of intellectual property; a resource with economic value. As a valuable resource, one can expect the individual to seek a reasonable return on this asset. If the firm appropriates all of the returns, it is reasonable to expect the individual to seek a higher personal return from his or her intellectual property. Those with potential knowledge may seek alternative opportunities to capture some of the value of their intellectual property for themselves, and thereby pursue entrepreneurial outlets even if they had not initially intended or desired to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. J., & Katz, R. (1995). The project-oriented engineer: a dilemna for human resource management. R&D Management, 25, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B. (2003). Risk taking in intrapreneurship: translating the individual level risk aversion into the organizational risk taking. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 11(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2003). Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G., & Echarananta, N. (1999). Capturing entrepreneurial values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 820–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y. (2010). “The strategic use of architectural knowledge by entrepreneurial firms”. Presented at the “opening up innovation: strategy, organization and technology” conference, imperial college London business school, June 16–18. Accessed July 12, from http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?hl=en&q=http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php%3Fid%3D501471%26cf%3D43&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm2NMAEWsdOoCyHjqswO063L2-eynQ&oi=scholarr.

  • Baron, J. M., Hannan, T., & Burton, M. D. (2001). Labor pains: change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high‐tech firms. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 960–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, S. G., Varadarajan, P. R., & Fahy, J. (1993). Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 57, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. (1979). The job generation process. Cambridge: M.I.T. Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). “Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy”. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cariand, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9, 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1990). Scale and scope. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(25), 128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleya, F., Housemana, O., & Roya, R. (2007). An introduction to capturing and understanding the cognitive behaviour of design engineers. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(4), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. F. (2011). “Engineering is everywhere,” Keynote address, accessed April 17th, 2012 at http://freedownload.is/ppt/fortune-500-ceo.

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Time and entrepreneurial risk behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farlie, R. W. (2013). “Kauffman index of entrepreneurial activity” April 7, 2013. Accessed at http://www.kauffman.org/what-we-do/research/kauffman-index-of-entrepreneurial-activity.

  • Felicelli, M., & Allen, K. (2006). “2006 Route to the top”, Spencer Stewart, accessed at: http://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/2005_CEO_Study_JS.pdf.

  • Felin, T., & Hesterly, W. S. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. C. (1968). “Engineering manpower in Canada”. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Columbus: Ohio State University.

  • Gross, A. C. (1969a). On engineering education and engineering students. Journal of Higher Education, 40(7), 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. C. (1969b). Patterns and determinants of income of Canadian engineering graduates. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 23(1), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurka, S. (2011). “Why engineers could make the best business leaders.” Business Insider, December 18, 25.

  • Heunks, F. J. (1998). Innovation, creativity and success. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, N. P. (2000). An examination of the ‘sustainable competitive advantage’ concept: past, present, and future. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 20, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, B. (2013). “The bloomberg legacy,” New York Times, July 15, A17.

  • Kennedy, C. (2001). “Show me the money,” Director, Nov. 2001, 55(4), p103

  • Kotelnikov, V. (2001). “Collecting, leveraging, and distributing both explicit and tacit knowledge throughout your organization”, retrieved March 25, 2002 from www.1000ventures.com/.

  • Lavoie, M., & Finnie, R. (1998). The occupational dynamics of recent Canadian engineering graduates inside and outside the bounds of technology. Research Policy, 27(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W., & Maurer, S. D. (1997). The retention of knowledge workers with the unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Human Resources, Management Review., 3, 247–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowendahl, G., Revang, O., & Fosstenlokken, S. (2007). Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: a framework for analysis. Human Relations, 54(7), 911–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., Brighamb, K. H., & Moss, T. W. (2010). “Long-term orientation: implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses”. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An, International Journal, 22(3–4), 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, J., & Johnson, G. (2003). “Entrepreneurial intentions and outcomes: a comparative causal mapping study”. Journal of Management Studies, 34(6), 895–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martelli, J., & Abels, P. (2010). The education of a leader: educational credentials and other characteristics of chief executive officers. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matusik, S., & Hill, C. (1998). The utilization of contngent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 680–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moti, F. (2006). Knowledge, abilities, cognitive characteristics and behavioral competences of engineers with high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST). Systems Engineering, 9(2), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryoo, J., & Rosen, S. (2004). The engineering labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), S110–S140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachoff, M. (2008). “A 3% decrease since 1983”, Smallbusinessnewz.com, accessed at http://www.smallbusinessnewz.com/number-of-americans-starting-small-businesses-declining-2008–01.

  • Shane, S. (2012). “Start up failure rates: the definitive numbers, small business trends, Dec.12. Accessed at:http://smallbiztrends.com/2012/12/start-up-failure-rates-the-definitive-numbers.html.

  • Smith, K. B. (2002). Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Studies Journal., 30(3), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solymossy, E. (2000). Entrepreneurial dimensions: the relationship of individual, venture, and environmental factors to success. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solymossy, E. (2011). “The value of knowledge; applied versus potential.” Working Paper. Western Illinois University – Quad Cities.

  • Solymossy, E., Chowhan, J., & Gross, A. (2012). Taking the engineering path to business leadership and entrepreneurial success in Canada and USA. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 11, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62, 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M., Wils, T., & Proulx, C. (1998). “Determinants of desired career paths among Canadian engineers”. Scientific series paper, 98s-15. Montreal: CIRANO at HEC/UM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M., Gianecchini, & Wils, T. (2007). “Determinants of subjective and objective success among Canadian and french engineers”. 18ieme Congres de AF/AGHR, 1–23.

  • Unknown. (2011). “Employee turnover expected to rise in next five years”, accessed on Jan 13, 2014, at http://www.right.com/news-and-events/pressreleases/2011-press-releases/item21771.aspx.

  • Unknown. (2013a). “Origins of engineering”, accessed on July 8, 2013, at http://www.seas.ucla.edu/hsseas/history/origin.html.

  • Unknown. (2013b). “The beginnings of engineering in Canada”, in The EIC Virtual Museum Project, accessed on July 8, 2013 at http://power.eng.mcmaster.ca/findlay/eicweb/virtual.html.

  • Vesey, J. T. (1991). The New competitors: they think in terms of ‘speed-to-market. Academy of Management Perspective, 5(2), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glinow, M. A. (1988). The new professionals. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. E. (2002). Engineering education in Canada. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1(2), 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. (2001). Engineers, entrepreneurs, and the commercialization of technology. Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 2, 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. H. (1998). The Engineering Journal as a source for the history of engineering in Canada. History & Archives Working Paper. Ottawa: Engineering Institute of Canada.

  • WSJ (2013). “53 percent of Americans consider starting their own start-up”. Wall Street Journal, July 15. Accessed at http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130715–907828.html?mod=wsj_share_twitter.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Western Illinois University, 3300 River Drive, Moline, IL, 61265, USA

    Emeric Solymossy

  2. Department of Marketing, Monte Ahuja College of Business, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Andrew Gross

Authors
  1. Emeric Solymossy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emeric Solymossy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solymossy, E., Gross, A. Taking the engineering path to business leadership and entrepreneurial success in Canada and USA. Int Entrep Manag J 11, 393–408 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0298-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0298-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation