Skip to main content
Log in

Founder nativity, founding team formation, and firm performance in the U.S. high-tech sector

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the movement of foreign-born entrepreneurs out of ethnic enclaves and into the mainstream, globally-connected economies of the countries of immigration, and from necessity to opportunity entrepreneurship. The theoretical contribution of the paper is to integrate the emerging literature on foreign-born entrepreneurship with work on the composition and impact of founding teams. Empirically, we draw on original quantitative and qualitative data on the U.S. high-tech sector. We find that homophily drives team formation and that nationality diversity in founding teams has a modest impact on firm performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Corporate Research Board’s American Corporate Statistical Library (ACSL) contains more than 140 variables on all business establishments in the country. The ACSL links each establishment over time from its birth through any physical moves it makes, capturing changes in ownership along the way, and recording the establishment’s death if it occurs. The result is a unique longitudinal business file that allows for micro- and macroeconomic analysis of the U.S. economy. Corporate Research Board updates the ACSL every 6 months, drawing on hundreds of public and private sector data sources. Its principal data sources are Dun and Bradstreet’s DMI file, Bureau of Labor Statistics’s Industry Occupation Mix, and Census Bureau’s PUMS file.

  2. The employment growth quantifier (EGQ) is the product of the absolute and percent change in employment over a 4-year period of time, expressed as a decimal. EGQ is used to mitigate the unfavorable impact of measuring employment change solely in either percent or absolute terms, since the former favors small companies and the latter large businesses.

  3. In order to maintain historical continuity, our database uses SIC codes rather than NAICS codes. We dropped SIC 874, management and public relations, which met the BLS definition, but was so large that it would have dominated our results.

  4. If we omit educational level of the founders in this regression, the significance of the work tie variable drops below statistical significance, although none of the education variables is significant, either. If we think of the education variable as a proxy for positive selection among immigrants (in other words, the U.S. chooses them because of their academic prowess), we may hypothesize that higher and graduate education can substitute to a limited degree for prior shared work experience in the development of team trust.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Parsons, W., & Tracy, S. (2008). High impact firms: Gazelles revisited. (SBA Office of Advocacy Working Paper no. 328). Washington: SBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Waldinger, R. (1990). Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Entrepreneurship policy and the strategic management of places. In D. M. Hart (Ed.), The emergence of entrepreneurship policy (pp. 20–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, S., Coughlin, C. C., & Wall, H. J. (2008). Ethnic networks and U.S. exports. Review of International Economics, 16, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., & Shvyrkov, O. (2007). Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Management Journal, 28, 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., Burton, M. D., & O’Reilly, C. (2007). Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. Journal of Business Venturing, 22

  • Beine, M., Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2008). Human capital formation in developing countries. The Economic Journal, 118, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Blinder, A. S. (2009). Offshoring and American jobs: What response from U.S. economic policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N. S., & Levie, J. (2010). Global entrepreneurship Monitor 2009 executive report. Wellesley: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caligiuri, P., Lazarova, M., & Zehetbauer, S. (2004). Top managers’ national diversity and boundary spanning: Attitudinal indicators of a firm’s internationalization. Journal of Management Development, 23, 848–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (2000). The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2009). The age of migration (4th ed.). Westport: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., & Vasta, E. (2004). Australia: New conflicts around old dilemmas. In W. Cornelius (Ed.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (pp. 141–173). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaganti, R. S., Watts, A. D., Chaganti, R., & Zimmerman-Treichel, M. (2008). Ethnic-immigrants in founding teams: Effects on prospector strategy and performance in new Internet ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G. N., Honig, B., & Wiklund, J. (2005). Antecedents, moderators, and performance consequences of membership change in new venture teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 705–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. R. (1978). The effect of Americanization on the earnings of foreign-born men. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 897–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important? Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 727–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34, 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Research Service. (2006). U.S. Immigration Policy on Permanent Admissions. Washington: Congressional Research Service.

  • Congressional Research Service. (2008). Foreign students in the United States: Policies and legislation. Washington: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L. (2010). Transnational entrepreneurs, worldchanging entrepreneurs, and ambassadors: A typology of the new breed of expatriates. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Fleming, G., & Schwienbache, A. (2009). Corporate relocation in venture capital finance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1121–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, S. (2006). The take-up of business support by minority ethnic enterprises: The experience of South Asian businesses in England. Entrepreneurship Management, 2, 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docquier, F., Özden, C., & Peri, G. (2010). The wage effects of immigration and emigration. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16646. December.

  • Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1001–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In F. I. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (pp. 133–155). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. W. (2008). Estimating the contribution of immigrant business owners to the U.S. economy. (Office of Advocacy Research Summary No. 334). Washington: Small Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. W., Krashinsky, H. A., Zissimopoulos, J. M., & Kumar, K. (2010). Indian entrepreneurial success in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. RAND Working Paper Series WR-727. RAND: Santa Monica.

  • Forbes, D. P., Borchert, P. S., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2006). Entrepreneurial team formation: an exploration of new member addition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. H., & Sandberg, W. R. (2000). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25, 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadlock, P., Hecker, D., & Gannon, J. (1991, July). High technology employment: another view. Monthly Labor Review, 26–30.

  • Hambrick, D. C., Davison, S. C., Snell, S. A., & Snow, C. C. (1998). When groups consist of different nationalities: Toward a new understanding of the implications. Organization Studies, 19, 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Klein, K. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D. M., & Acs, Z. J. (2011). High-tech immigrant entrepreneurship in the U.S. Economic Development Quarterly, 25, 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D. M., & Tian, F. (2010). Human resources: Hong Kong’s challenges and opportunities. In D. B. Fuller (Ed.), Innovation policy and the limits of laissez-faire (pp. 69–96). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T. F. (2007). Entrepreneurs and the process of obtaining resources. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. H., Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E. (2007). Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Research Policy, 36, 768–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2010). Work team diversity. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Volume II. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. P., Muñoz, J. M., & Alon, I. (2007). Filipino ethnic entrepreneurship: An integrated review and propositions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 3, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., & Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. R. (2008). Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 518–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, J. (2007). Immigration, in-migration, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship in the U.K. Small Business Economics, 28, 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., & Jaworsky, B. N. (2007). Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, J., Li, J., & Gartner, W.B. (2011). The effects of founding team diversity and social similarity on venture formation. Journal of Business Venturing. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.002

  • Light, I. (1972). Ethnic enterprise in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, I. H., & Rosenstein, C. N. (1995). Race, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship in urban America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofstrom, M. (2009). Low-skilled immigrant entrepreneurship. IZA discussion paper no. 4560. Bonn: IZA.

  • Michaels, E. Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (1998). The war for talent. The McKinsley Quarterly.

  • National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators. Washington: National Science Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. I., Lee, J. A., & Soutar, G. N. (2007). Are Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s value frameworks congruent? International Marketing Review, 24, 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. (2009). Top management team internationalization and firm performance. Management International Review, 50, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Open for business: Immigrant entrepreneurship in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packalen, K. A. (2007). Complementing capital: The role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams’ abilities to obtain resources. Entrepreneurship Theory And Practice, 31, 873–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. E. (2007). The difference. how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peri, G. & Sparber, C. (2009). Task specialization, immigration and wages. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 1, art. 3.

  • Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1320–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Haller, W. J. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review, 67, 278–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (2006). Let their people come. Washington: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E. W., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, J. G. (2004). Canada: Immigration and nation-building in the transition to a knowledge economy. In W. Cornelius (Ed.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (pp. 97–133). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Camp, S. M., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., & Hay, M. (2002). GEM global 2001 summary report. Wellesley, MA, and London: London Business School and Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68, 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1999). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual/opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar.

  • Varga, A. (1998). University research and regional innovation. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vissa, B., & Chacar, A. S. (2009). Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1179–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, V., et al. (2007). America’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. Durham: Duke University School of Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, B. (2010). The great brain race. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges financial support from the U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy (contract SBAHQ-09-M-0455), data and insights from Spencer Tracy of the Corporate Research Board, expert advice from Zoltan Acs and Paul Reynolds, research assistance from Fangmeng Tian and Jitendra Parajuli, and comments offered by participants at the Industry Studies Association 2010 annual meeting. Some of the data and descriptive analysis in this paper have previously been released by the SBA in research summary 349, July 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Hart.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table 12 High-Technology SICs (3 Digit)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hart, D.M. Founder nativity, founding team formation, and firm performance in the U.S. high-tech sector. Int Entrep Manag J 10, 1–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0188-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0188-x

Keywords

Navigation