Skip to main content
Log in

Response measurement and optimization of direct mailings

  • State-of-the-Art
  • Published:
Journal für Betriebswirtschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beginning with 1995, we discuss different studies that deal with response measurement and optimization of direct mailings. Most of these studies analyze data sets from mail order companies or charities. We classify various dependent and predictor variables and—w.r.t. the latter distinguish static and dynamic effects. Response models are divided into parametric and flexible models. Besides, we analyze important modeling aspects, i.e., latent heterogeneity and endogeneity. Optimization methods are presented according to whether they refer to static or dynamic objectives. Based on these modeling aspects we evaluate the different studies. Considering various studies of model evaluation it becomes evident that logit models frequently constitute a good choice. However, Bayesian neural nets and Tobit models turn out to be good alternatives. As predictor effects are concerned results vary. Authors do not completely agree on which variables are the most important. Furthermore, signs and significances of predictors vary across studies. The majority of studies neglect latent heterogeneity and endogeneity. Finally, results show that there are still plenty of interesting research possibilities, such as a comprehensive evaluation of models or new specifications of (mailing) variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya T (1985) Advanced econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Mela CF (2003) E-customization. J Mark Res 40(2):131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baesens B, Viaene S, Van den Poel D, Vanthienen J, Dedene G (2002) Bayesian neural network learning for repeat purchase modelling in direct marketing. Eur J Oper Res 138:191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner B, Hruschka H (2005) Allocation of catalogs to collective customers based on semiparametric response models. Eur J Oper Res 162(3):839–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitran G, Mondschein S (1996) Mailing decisions in the catalog sales industry. Manag Sci 42(9):1364–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg RC, Kim B-D, Neslin SA (2008) Database marketing analyzing and managing customers. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bult JR, Wansbeek T (1995) Optimal selection for direct mail. Mark Sci 14(4):378–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BVH (2011) Genutzte Informationsquellen der Kunden für den Kauf im Interaktiven Handel, [press release], 2011, Available at: http://www.bvh.info/index.php?eID=tx_cms_showpic&file=uploads%2Fpics%2FFolie6.PNG&md5=8568ac1b6081ba3303b5724e0ef4238fc88accd1&parameters[0]=YTo0OntzOjU6IndpZHRoIjtzOjQ6IjgwMG0iO3M6NjoiaGVpZ2h0IjtzOjQ6IjYw&parameters[1]=MG0iO3M6NzoiYm9keVRhZyI7czo0MToiPGJvZHkgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbjowOyBi&parameters[2]=YWNrZ3JvdW5kOiNmZmY7Ij4iO3M6NDoid3JhcCI7czozNzoiPGEgaHJlZj0iamF2&parameters[3]=YXNjcmlwdDpjbG9zZSgpOyI%2BIHwgPC9hPiI7fQ%3D%3D, Accessed 28.09.12

  • BVH (2012) Umsatzzahlen des Interaktiven Handels im 1. Quartal 2012, [press release], 17.04.2012, Available at: http://www.bvh.info/presse/pressemitteilungen/details/datum/2012/april/artikel/umsatzzahlen-des-interaktiven-handels-im-1-quartal-2012-grosse-umsaetze-schon-im-ersten-quartal-de/, Accessed 28.09.12

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics methods and applications, 8th edn. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D, Erdahl R, Johnson D, Bibelnieks E, Haydock M, Bullock M, Crowder H (2001) Optimizing customer mail streams at fingerhut. Interfaces 31(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta P, Erdem T, Rossi PE, Wedel M (2006) Structural modeling in marketing. Review and assessment. Mark Sci 25(6):604–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corstjens M, Doyle P (1981) A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Manag Sci 27(7):822–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosslett SR (1983) Distribution-free maximum likelihood estimator of the binary choice model. Econometrica 51(3):765–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui G, Wong ML, Lui H-K (2006) Machine learning for direct marketing response models: Bayesian networks with evolutionary programming. Manag Sci 52(4):597–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet P (1996) Comparaison de la prédictivité d’un réseau de neurones à rétropropagation avec celles des méthodes de régression linéaire, logistique et AID pour le calcul des scores en marketing direct. Rech Appl Mark 11(2):17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Donkers B, Paap R, Jonker JJ, Franses PH (2006) Deriving target selection rules from endogenously selected samples. J Appl Econom 21(5):549–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner R, Krafft M, Huchzermeier A (2003) Optimizing rhenania’s mail-order business through dynamic multilevel modeling (DMLM). Interfaces 33(1):50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner R, Krafft M, Huchzermeier A (2004) Optimizing rhenania’s direct marketing business through dynamic multilevel modeling (DMLM) in a multicatalog-brand environment. Mark Sci 23(2):192–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson T, Whitehed TM (2002) Two-step GMM estimation of the errors-in-variables model using high-order moments. Econom Theory 18(3):776–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fader PS, Hardie BGS, Lee KL (2005) RFM and CLV: using iso-value curves for customer base analysis. J Mark Res 42(4):415–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fader PS, Hardie BGS, Shang J (2010) Customer-base analysis in a discrete-time noncontractual setting. Mark Sci 29(6):1086–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis N, Holland N (1999) The diary of a charity donor: an exploration of research information from the royal mail consumer panel and mail characteristics survey. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 4(3):217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gönül F, Shi MZ (1998) Optimal mailing of catalogs: a new methodology using estimable structural dynamic programming models. Manag Sci 44(9):1249–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gönül FF, Ter Hofstede F (2006) How to compute optimal catalog mailing decisions. Mark Sci 25(1):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gönül FF, Kim B-D, Shi MZ (2000) Mailing smarter to catalog customers. J Interact Mark 14(2):2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha K, Cho S, Maclachlan D (2005) Response models based on bagging neural networks. J Interact Mark 19(1):17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland H (1993) Direktmarketing. Verlag Franz Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka H (2008) Neural nets and genetic algorithms in marketing. In: Wierenga B (ed) Handbook of marketing decision models. International series in operations research and management science. Springer, New York, pp 399–433

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka H (2010) Considering endogeneity for optimal catalog allocation in direct marketing. Eur J Oper Res 206(1):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka H, Baumgartner B, Semmler M (2003) Wirkungsmessung und Allokation von Katalogen in Versandhandel und Direktmarketing: Katalogversand an Sammelbesteller. Z Betriebswirtsch 73(1):7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Izenman AJ (2008) Modern multivariate statistical techniques regression, classification, and manifold learning. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jen L, Chou C-H, Allenby GM (2003) A Bayesian approach to modeling purchase frequency. Mark Lett 14(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker J-J, Paap R, Franses PH (2000) Modeling charity donations: target selection, response time and gift size. Available at: http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1640/feweco20000217100756.pdf. Accessed 28.09.12

  • Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon Y-K, Moon B-R (2001) Personalized email marketing with a genetic programming circuit model. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 1352–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivière B, van den Poel D (2005) Predicting customer retention and profitability by using random forests and regression forests techniques. Expert Syst Appl 29(2):472–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeflang PSH, Wittink DR, Wedel M, Naert PA (2000) Building models for marketing decisions. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin N, Zahavi J (1998) Continuous predictive modeling—a comparative analysis. J Interact Mark 12(2):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin N, Zahavi J (2001) Predictive modeling using segmentation. J Interact Mark 15(2):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malthouse EC (1999) Ridge regression and direct marketing scoring models. J Interact Mark 13(4):10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchanda P, Rossi PE, Chintagunta P (2004) Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. J Mark Res 41(4):467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik PA, Piersma N (2002) Understanding the role of marketing communications in direct marketing. Econometric institute report ei 2002-13, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam:1-29

  • Nash EL (1994) Direct marketing: strategy planning execution, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piersma N, Jonker J-J (2004) Determining the optimal direct mailing frequency. Eur J Oper Res 158(1):173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkowski Leszczyc PTL, Bass FM (1998) Determining the effects of observed and unobserved heterogeneity on consumer brand choice. Appl Stoch Models Data Anal 14:95–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinzie A, van den Poel D (2008) Random forests for multiclass classification: random multinomial logit. Expert Syst Appl 34(3):1721–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reutterer T, Mild A, Natter M, Taudes A (2006) A dynamic segmentation approach for targeting and customizing direct marketing campaigns. J Interact Mark 20(3/4):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee S, McIntyre S (2008) Including the effects of prior and recent contact effort in a customer scoring model for database marketing. J Acad Mark Sci 36(4):538–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts ML, Berger PD (1999) Direct marketing management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Mark Sci 4(15):321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust RT, Verhoef PC (2005) Optimizing the marketing interventions mix in intermediate-term CRM. Mark Sci 24(3):477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simester D, Hu Y(J), Brynjolfsson E, Anderson ET (2009) Dynamics of retail advertising: evidence from a field experiment. Econ Inq 47(3):482–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh EH, Noh KC, Suh CK (1999) Customer list segmentation using the combined response model. Expert Syst Appl 17:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urban A (1998) Einsatz Künstlicher Neuronaler Netze bei der operativen Werbemitteleinsatzplanung im Versandhandel im Vergleich zu ökonometrischen Verfahren. Dissertation, University of Regensburg

  • Van Diepen M, Donkers B, Franses PH (2009) Dynamic and competitive effects of direct mailings: a charitable giving application. J Mark Res 46(1):120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel M, Kamakura WA (1998) Market segmentation concetpural and methodological foundations. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi J, Levin N (1997) Applying neural computing to target marketing. J Direct Mark 11(4):76–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Schröder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schröder, N., Hruschka, H. Response measurement and optimization of direct mailings. J Betriebswirtsch 62, 261–308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-012-0088-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-012-0088-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation