Skip to main content
Log in

Credit Risk Determinants for the Bulgarian Banking System

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using an autoregressive distributed lag model, this paper examines the factors that influence the credit risk of the Bulgarian banking system over the decade 2001–2010, as measured by non-performing loans. Recent papers aim to identify the determinants of non-performing loans using a cross-country modelling framework. As the South East European region (SEE) is non-homogeneous, our analysis is country-specific and captures the timeline between the bank privatisation era up to the global financial crisis and the ensuing Greek crisis. The contribution of our paper is twofold: it uses the ARDL modelling framework that is scarcely employed in related studies but also investigates spillover effects from the Greek crisis in view of the material presence of Greek banks in Bulgaria. In accordance with previous studies, the findings suggest that the credit risk determinants of Bulgarian banks should be sought endogenously in macroeconomic variables and industry-specific factors but also in exogenous factors. We evidence a pronounced role of the global financial crisis and the country’s bank regulatory framework. The Greek debt crisis appears to play an immaterial role indicating that Greek banks have not been a Trojan horse in the Bulgarian banking system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As of end 2009, five Greek Banks together controlled 29 % of the sector’s assets (BNB 2009).

  2. For instance, in early 2005, the Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) introduced credit ceilings whereby banks were allowed to expand credit by up to 6 % per quarter.

  3. These models are used in the studies conducted by the Central Banks of the UK, Japan, Spain, the Netherlands, and by the European Central Bank.

  4. The introduction of market variables such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and real estate price indices into credit risk models is a way of explicitly integrating the analysis of market and credit risks.

  5. The VAR model is based on a transmission that includes the following nine endogenous variables: the real effective exchange rate, exports, monetary aggregate M2, imports, aggregate bank loans to clients, the unemployment rate, the consumer price index, the domestic real 3-month interest rate and the share of non-performing loans in aggregate bank loans to clients.

  6. As long as the ARDL model is free of residual correlation, endogeneity is less of a problem. Pesaran and Shin (1999) demonstrated that the appropriate lags in the ARDL model correct for both serial correlation and endogeneity problems.

  7. In accordance with the Bulgarian National Bank (BNB), the doubtful loans include all past-due loans - 91 to 180 days as well as these loans where the debtor’s financial standing has substantially deteriorated. Loss loans are defined as past-due loans over 181 days and credit exposures where there are valid grounds to consider that borrowers are in a permanent state of financial inability to repay.

  8. The construction index, an indicator of construction production activity includes building construction (both residential and non-residential) and civil engineering (infrastructure construction) such as roads, telecoms and other type of construction.

  9. Real estate surveys indicate that the property market in Bulgaria has weakened considerably after the global financial crisis. A sharp contraction in the construction sector could ignite a major economic downward spiral with adverse consequences for banks’ loan portfolios.

  10. We refer to Type II banking crises as defined by Reinhart and Rogoff (2009). That is a milder banking crisis also known as financial distress where there are no runs, closure or large-scale government assistance of an important institution that marks the start of a string of similar outcomes for other financial institutions.

  11. Another proxy used to capture the Greek crisis effect on the Bulgarian credit risk was the spread differential between Greek and German long-term bond yields (SPGRD) as can be viewed in Table 3 in the Appendix.

  12. Based on data from the National Statistical Institute of Bulgaria (NSI), the influx of foreign funds in Bulgaria led to rapid construction and real-estate development, with property prices appreciating by over 50 %. Moody’s (2012) stresses that the construction and real-estate sector is the primary source of credit risk.

  13. The results reported in this paper include only one of the two Greek-crisis proxies used, the LLPGR. Similar results were obtained when the proxy SPGRD was used instead of LLPGR, not presented here but available upon request.

  14. The value of the F-statistic was 7.24 from the F-test that the coefficients of lagged variables are jointly zero and the lower and upper bounds at the 1 % significance level are (3.41, 4.68).

  15. The VECM results, not presented here are available upon request.

References

  • Abedola, S. S., Wan Yusoff, W. S., & Dalahan, J. (2011). An ARDL approach to the determinants of nonperforming loans in Islamic banking system in Malaysia. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(1), 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikman, D., Haldane, A.G. and Nelson, B. (2011). Curbing the Credit Cycle. Columbia University Center on Capitalism and Society Annual Conference “Microfoundations for Modern Macroeconomics”, New York.

  • Arghyrou, M. G., & Kontonikas, A. (2012). The EMU sovereign-debt crisis: Fundamentals, expectations and contagion. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22(4), 658–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteriou, D., & Hall, S. G. (2007). Applied econometrics: a modern approach using eviews and microfit. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasoglou, P.P. (2011). Bank capital and risk in the South Eastern European region. Bank of Greece Working Paper, No. 137.

  • Athanasoglou, P. P., Brissimis, S. N., & Delis, M. D. (2008). Bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baboucek, I., & Jancar, M. (2005). Effects of macroeconomic shock to the quality of the aggregate loan portfolio. Czech National Bank, Working Paper Series, 1, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1989). Agency costs, net worth and business fluctuations. American Economic Review, 79, 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, W., Jones, M., Majnoni, G., & Peria, S. M. (2001). Stress testing of financial systems: an overview of issues, methodologies, and FSAP experiences. IMF Working Paper, 188, 2–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • BNB (2009). Economic Review. Sofia.

  • BNB (2010). Banks in Bulgaria. Sofia.

  • Bonin, J. P., Hasan, I., & Wachtel, P. (2005). Privatization matters: bank efficiency in transition countries. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(8–9), 2155–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, M. (2002). A macroeconomic credit risk model for stress testing the Austrian credit portfolio. OeNB, Financial Stability Report, 4, 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, V. (2013). Macroeconomic determinants of the credit risk in the banking system: The case of the GIPSI. Economic Modelling, 31, 672–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottarelli, C., Dell’Ariccia, G. and Vladkova-Hollar, I. (2003). Early Birds, Late Risers, and Sleeping Beauties: Bank Credit Growth to the Private Sector in Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans. IMF Working Paper, No. 213.

  • Cull, R. and Martínez Pería, M.S. (2012). Bank Ownership and Lending Patterns during the 2008–2009 Financial Crisis. Evidence from Latin America and Eastern Europe. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, 6195.

  • De Bock, R., and Demyanets, A. (2012). Bank Asset Quality in Emerging Markets: Determinants and Spillovers. IMF Working Paper, No.71.

  • Delgado, J. and Saurina, J. (2004). Credit Risk and Loan Loss Provisions. An Analysis with Macroeconomic Variables. Banco de Espana Working Paper, No. 12.

  • Dobrinsky, R. and Markov, N. (2003). Policy Regime Change and Corporate Credit in Bulgaria: Asymmetric Supply and Demand Responses, William Davidson Institute Working Paper, No. 607.

  • Duenwald, C., Gueorguiev, N. and Schaechter, A. (2005). Too Much of a Good Thing? Credit Booms in Transition Economies: The Cases of Bulgaria, Romania, and Ukraine. IMF Working Paper, No. 128.

  • EBRD (2006). Transition Report 2005. London.

  • ECBI (2012). Vienna Initiative Working Group on NPLs in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe, March 2012.

  • Engle, R., & Granger, C. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 35, 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, R. and Prasad A. (2010). Nonperforming Loans in the GCC Banking System and their Macroeconomic Effects. IMF Working Paper, No. 224.

  • Foglia, A. (2008). Stress Testing Credit Risk: A Survey of Authorities’ Approaches. Bank of Italy WorkingPaper, No.37.

  • Frömmel, M. and Karagyozova, K. (2008). Bank lending and asset prices: evidence from Bulgaria. Bulgarian National Bank Discussion paper, No.65.

  • Gambera, M. (2000). Simple forecasts of bank loan in the business cycle. Emerging Issues Series, 3, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, M. and Hausman, R. (1996) The roots of banking crises: the macroeconomic context. Inter-American Development Bank, Working paper, No.318.

  • Greenidge, K. and Grosvenor, T. (2009). Forecasting Non-performing Loans in Barbados. Bank of Barbados Working Paper.

  • Hoggarth, G., Logan, A., & Zicchino, L. (2005). Macro stress tests of UK banks. BIS Papers, 22, 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hristov, K. and Mihailov, M. (2002). Lending Activity of the Commercial Banks and Rationing on the credit market in Bulgaria. Bulgarian National Bank, Discussion Paper, No. 23.

  • IMF (2010). Bulgaria: Selected Issues. Country Report No 10/159, pp. 177.

  • IMF. (2012). World economic outlook, October 2012: coping with high debt and SluggishGrowth. USA: Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2013). World economic outlook, April 2013: hopes, realities. Washington, USA: Risks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration- with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalirai, H., & Scheicher, M. (2002). Macroeconomic stress testing: preliminary evidence for Austria. OeNB, Financial Stability Report, 3, 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavkler, A., & Festić, M. (2010). The trade deficit and banking sector results in Romania and Bulgaria. Economic Interferences, 12(27), 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. P. (1978). Manias, panics and crashes: a history of financial crises. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyotaki, N., & Moore, J. (1997). Credit cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 211–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2013). Non-Performing Loans in CESEE: Determinants and Impact on Macroeconomic Performance. IMF Working Paper, No 72.

  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louzis, D., Vouldis, A., & Metaxas, V. (2012). Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of Non-performing loans in Greece: a comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 1012–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, H., & Agarwal, S. (2007). Impact of real interest rates on real output growth in India: a long-Run analysis in a liberalized financial regime. The Singapore Economic Review, 52(2), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masih, M., & Hamdan, B. (2008). The impact of monetary policy on deposit and lending rates in industrial and developing countries: an application of ARDL approach. Journal of International Finance & Economics, 8(3), 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melander, O., Pant, M., Segoviano, M., & Vamvakidis, A. (2011). Dancing spreads: market assessment of contagion from the crisis in the euro periphery based on distress dependence analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 17, 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s (2012). Banking System Outlook: Bulgaria.

  • Nkusu, M. (2011). Nonperforming Loans and Macrofinancial Vulnerabilities in Advanced Economies. IMF Working Paper, No. 161.

  • Nikolaidou, E. and Vogiazas, S. (2013). Credit Risk Modelling in the Romanian Banking System: evidence from an ARDL model. In: A. Karasavvoglou and P. Polychronidou (Eds.), Contributions to Economics: Balkan and Eastern European Countries in the Midst of the Global Economic Crisis. Springer.

  • Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, 1361–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron, P. (1997). Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Journal of Econometrics, 80(2), 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. P. (1998). Structural analysis of cointegrating VARs. Journal of Economic Survey, 12, 471–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom, A. Hollyand, & P. Diamond (Eds.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The ragner Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, H. M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesola, J. (2001). The Role of Macroeconomic Shocks in Banking Crises. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper, No 6.

  • Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quagliariello, M. (2004). Banks’ performance over the business cycle: a panel analysis on Italian intermediaries. The University of York Discussion Papers on Economics, 17, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, L., & Sanchis-Arellano, A. (2006). Household debt sustainability: what explains household non-performing loans? An empirical analysis. ECB Working Paper, 570, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, M. B. and Chowdhury, K. (2005). ARDL Modelling Approach to Testing the Financial Liberalisation Hypothesis, University of Wollongong Working Paper, pp. 5-15.

  • Sims, C. (1980) Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, Vol. 48.

  • Vogiazas, S. and Nikolaidou, E. (2011a). Credit risk determinants in the Bulgarian banking system and the Greek twin crises. Paper presented at MIBES International conference, 2011, Serres, Greece.

  • Vogiazas, S. and Nikolaidou, E. (2011b). Investigating the determinants of non-performing loans in the Romanian banking system: An empirical study with reference to the Greek crisis. Economic Research International Journal, Article 214689, doi:10.1155/2011/214689.

  • Zeman, J. and Jurca, P. (2008). Macro Stress Testing of the Slovak Banking Sector. National Bank of Slovakia Working Paper, 1.

  • Zivot, E., & Andrews, K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the Oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(10), 251–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous referees of the journal as well as to the participants of the 5th International Conference ‘The Economies of Balkan and Eastern European Countries in the Changed World’, EBEEC 2013, 9–12 May 2013, Istanbul, Turkey for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofoklis D. Vogiazas.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 The dataset
Table 4 ARDL (1,1,0,0,0) selected based on Schwarz Bayesian criterion dependent variable: NPL (non-performing loans)
Table 5 Diagnostic tests for the ARDL (1,1,0,0,0) model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nikolaidou, E., Vogiazas, S.D. Credit Risk Determinants for the Bulgarian Banking System. Int Adv Econ Res 20, 87–102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-013-9444-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-013-9444-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation