Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Realization of Mobile Femtocells: Operational and Protocol Requirements

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Femtocells are commissioned in wide range of commercial systems, such as CDMA, GSM, LTE, Wi-Fi, and WiMAX, and offer economically viable solutions to improve network scalability and indoor coverage. The ability to offer multitude of context-aware and value added services, and per-user customization have caught world-wide research interest on femtocells. In this article, we have investigated the feasibility to use femtocells as short-range mobile base stations, and discussed the demanding architectural requirements and challenges. The protocol stack on legacy femtocells must be modified to realize mobility. Mobility introduces new challenges in security and user privacy. Firstly, we analyze several candidate mobility protocols that are deployable on Mobile Femtocells (MFs). Among them, Host Identity Protocol (HIP) was chosen due to enhanced support in flexible mobility, security and end-user privacy. Secondly, we propose the indispensable modifications that enable device mobility, and the suitable transport architecture options based on direct IP links and relay chains. Finally, with the simulation results, the proposal is verified, and the architectural options are evaluated. That, in turn, proves the proposed mobility protocol has low latency in location locking with respect to another competing protocol and low resource utilization as it is depicted from mean round trip time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Technical Specification Group Service and System Aspects; Security of Home Node B (HNB) / Home evolved Node B (HeNB), 3GPP TR 33.820 version 8.3.0 Release December 8, 2009.

  2. Nikander, P., Gurtov, A., & Henderson, T. R. (2010). Host identity protocol (HIP): Connectivity, mobility, multi-homing, security, and privacy over IPv4 and IPv6 networks. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 12(2), 186–204 (Second Quarter).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gurtov A. (2008) Host identity protocol (HIP): Towards the secure mobile internet, vol. 21. Wiley, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Namal, S., Gurtov, A., & Bennis, M. (2011). Securing the backhaul for mobile and multi-homed femtocells. In Proceedings of the future network & mobile summit (FutureNetw) 2011, IEEE, pp. 1–15, 15–17.

  5. Technical Specification Group Service and System Aspects; Security of Home Node B (HNB)/Home evolved Node B (HeNB) 3GPP TR 33.320 version 9.1.0. Release 9, 2010.

  6. El-Din, N. D., Sourour, E. A., Ghaleb, I. A., & Seddik, K. G. (2011). Femtocells interference avoidance using femtocell identification. In Proceedings of the 28th national radio science conference (NRSC), IEEE, pp. 1–9, 26–28.

  7. Namal, S., Ghaboosi, K., Bennis, M., MacKenzie, A. B., & Latva-aho, M. (2010). Joint admission control & interference avoidance in self-organized femtocells. In Proceedings of the 44th asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (ASILOMAR), IEEE, pp. 1067–1071.

  8. Chowdhury, M. Z., Lee, S. Q., Ru, B. H., Park, N., & Jang, Y. M. (2011). Service quality improvement of mobile users in vehicular environment by mobile femtocell network deployment. In Proceedings of the international conference on ICT convergence (ICTC), IEEE, pp. 194–198.

  9. Ray, B. (2010). Femtocells wilt under attack. Available http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/02/femtocell_security/.

  10. Bright, P. (2011). Insecure vodafone femtocells allow evesdropping, call fraud. Available http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2011/07/insecure-vodafone-femtocells-allow-eavesdropping-call-fraud.ars.

  11. Nokia Siemens Networks. (2008). Thalys high speed train passengers enjoy broadband internet access. Available http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/sites/default/files/document/45396726766.pdf.

  12. Namal, S., Pellikka, J., & Gurtov, A. (2012). Secure and multihomed vehicular femtocells. In Proceedings of the 75th vehicular technology conference vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), IEEE, pp. 6–9.

  13. Dutta, A., Lin, F. J., Das, S., Chee, D., & Yokota, H. (2008). Proxy mobile IP, Google Patents, US Patent App. 12/012,014.

  14. Yan, Z., Zhang, S., Zhou, H., Zhang, H., & You, I. (2010). Network mobility support in PMIPv6 network. In Proceedings of the 6th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference, ACM, pp. 890–894.

  15. Noriega-Vivas, P., Campo, C., Garcia-Rubio, C., & Garcia-Lozano, E. (2011). Supporting L3 femtocell mobility using the MOBIKE protocol. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on access networks. ACCESS, pp. 30–35.

  16. Kivinen, T., & Tschofenig, H. (2006). Design of the IKEv2 mobility and multihoming (MOBIKE) protocol, RFC 4621, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

  17. Nikander, P., Henderson, T., Vogt, C., & Arkk, J. (2006). End-host mobility and multihoming with the host identity protocol, RFC 5206, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

  18. Moskowitz, R. (2012). HIP diet EXchange (DEX), draft-moskowitz-hip-rg-dex-06 (work in progress), Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

  19. Li X., Weerawardane T., Zaki Y., Timm-Giel A., Gorg C. (2011) Recent advances in broadband integrated network operations and services management. IGI Global Publishing, Hershey, pp 135–139

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, Z., & Wilson, M. (2010). User plane and control plane separation framework for home base stations. Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal, 46(1), 79–86. Fujitsu Ltd, 1015 Kamikodanaka Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki-shi, 211, Japan.

  21. Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network;Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN). S1 Application Protocol (S1AP), 3GPP TR 36.413 version 10.3.0 Release September 10, 2011.

  22. Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., & Eronen, P. (2010). Internet key exchange protocol version 2 (IKEv2), RFC 5996, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

  23. Heer, T., & Varjonen, S. (2011). Host identity protocol certificates, RFC 5201, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

  24. Borgaonkar, R., Redon, K., & Seifert, J. P. (2010). Experimental analysis of the femtocell location verification techniques. In Proceedings of the 15th nordic conference in secure IT systems (NordSec), Helsinki, Finland.

  25. LTE: Telecommunication management: Home enhanced Node B (HeNB) Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning (OAM and P): Procedure flows for Type 1 interface HeNB to HeNB Management System (HeMS), 3GPP TR 32.593 version 11.0.0 release 11, 2011.

  26. Telecommunication management; Home Node B (HNB) Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning (OAM and P); Procedure flows for Type 1 interface HNB to HNB Management System (HMS), 3GPP TR 32.583 version 10.2.0 release 10, 2011.

  27. Bernstein, J., Spets, T., Bathrick, G., & Pitsoulakis, G. (2004). DSL forum TR-069: CPE WAN management protocol. In Proceedings of DSL forum.

  28. Nie, P., Vähä-Herttua, J., Aura, T., & Gurtov, A. (2011). Performance analysis of HIP diet exchange for WSN security establishment. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM symposium on QoS and security for wireless and mobile networks, ACM, pp. 51–56.

  29. Varga A. (2010) Modeling and tools for network simulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 35–59

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Bokor, L., Novaczki, S., Zeke, L. T., & Jeney, G. (2009). Design and evaluation of host identity protocol (HIP) simulation framework for INET/OMNeT++. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, ACM, pp. 124–123.

  31. Yousaf, F. Z., Bauer, C., & Wietfeld, C. (2008). An accurate and extensible mobile IPv6 (xMIPV6) simulation model for OMNeT++. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on simulation tools and techniques for communications, networks and systems & workshops, ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), p. 88.

  32. Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Service requirements for Home Node B (HNB)and Home eNode B (HeNB), 3GPP TS 22.220, vol.9.8.0 release 9, 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4500, 90014, Oulu, Finland

    Suneth Namal, Madhusanka Liyanage & Andrei Gurtov

Authors
  1. Suneth Namal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Madhusanka Liyanage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrei Gurtov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suneth Namal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Namal, S., Liyanage, M. & Gurtov, A. Realization of Mobile Femtocells: Operational and Protocol Requirements. Wireless Pers Commun 71, 339–364 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-012-0818-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-012-0818-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation