Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Integrated Simulation-Assessment Approach for Evaluating Health Risks of Groundwater Contamination Under Multiple Uncertainties

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An integrated simulation-assessment approach (ISAA) was developed in this study to systematically tackle multiple uncertainties associated with hydrocarbon contaminant transport in subsurface and assessment of carcinogenic health risk. The fuzzy vertex analysis technique and the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) based stochastic simulation approach were combined into a fuzzy-Latin hypercube sampling (FLHS) simulation model and was used for predicting contaminant transport in subsurface under coupled fuzzy and stochastic uncertainties. The fuzzy-rule-based risk assessment (FRRA) was used for interpreting the general risk level through fuzzy inference to deal with the possibilistic uncertainties associated with both FLHS simulations and health-risk criteria. A study case involving health risk assessment for a benzene-contaminated site was examined. The study results demonstrated the proposed ISAA was useful for evaluating risks within a system containing complicated uncertainties and interactions and providing supports for identifying cost-effective site management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Sefry SA, Şen Z (2006) Groundwater rise problem and risk evaluation in major cities of arid lands—Jedddah case in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Water Resour Manage 20(1):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrit C, Guyonnet D, Dubois D (2007) Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination. J Contam Hydrol 93(1–4):72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair AN, Ayyub BM, Bender WJ (2001) Fuzzy stochastic risk-based decision analysis with the mobile offshore base as a case study. Mar Struct 14(1):69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard J, Burmaster DE (1992) Bivariate distributions for height and weight of men and women in the United States. Risk Anal 12(2):267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington CD, Bolger PM (1998) Uncertainty and risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 4(2):253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SQ (2000) Comparing probabilistic and fuzzy set approaches for design in the presence of uncertainty. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

  • Chen Z, Huang GH, Chakma A (2003) Hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for assessing environmental risks at contaminated groundwater systems. J Environ Eng 129(1):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu HJ, Chang LC (2009) Application of optimal control and fuzzy theory for dynamic groundwater remediation design. Water Resour Manage 23(4):647–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galya DP (1987) A horizontal plane source model for groundwater transport. Ground Water 25(6):733–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyonnet D, Bourgine B, Dubois D, Fargier H et al (2003) Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J Environ Eng 129:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed M, Bedient P (1999) Reliability-based uncertainty analysis of groundwater contaminant transport and remediation. USEPA Report EPA/600/R-99/028

  • Hanss W (2002) The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 130:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Chen Z, Tontiwachwuthicul P et al (1999) Environmental risk assessment for underground storage tanks through an interval parameter fuzzy relation analysis approach. Energ Sourc 21(1–2):75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington DE, Lyrintzis CS (1998) Improvements to and limitations of Latin hypercube sampling. Probabilist Eng Mech 13(4):245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Helton JC (1985) A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models. Technical Report SAND84-1461. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

  • Iman RL, Helton JC, Campbell JE (1981) An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models, Part 1. Introduction, input variable selection and preliminary variable assessment. J Qual Technol 13(3):174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentel E, Aral MM (2004) Probabilistic-fuzzy health risk modeling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18(5):324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Mari M, Schuhmacher M et al (2009) Partitioning total variance in risk assessment: application to a municipal solid waste incinerator. Environ Model Softw 24:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JB, Huang GH, Chakma A, Zeng GM (2003) Integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling of petroleum contamination in subsurface. Energy Sources 25(6):547–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JB, Liu L, Huang GH, Zeng GM (2006) A fuzzy-set approach for addressing uncertainties in risk assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated site. Water Air Soil Pollut 171(1–4):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JB, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Maqsood I, Huang YF (2007) An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination. J Environ Manag 82(2):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Huang YF, Zhou HD (2009) A multistage fuzzy-stochastic programming model for supporting sustainable water-resources allocation and management. Environ Model Softw 24:786–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Cheng SY, Guo HC (2004) A simulation-assessment modeling approach for analyzing environmental risks of groundwater contamination at waste landfill sites. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10(2):373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsood I, Li JB, Huang GH (2003) Inexact multiphase modeling system for the management of uncertainty in subsurface contamination. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manag 7(2):86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell RM, Pelmulder SD, Tompson AFB, Kastenberg WE (1998) On the development of a new methodology for groundwater-driven health risk assessment. Water Resour Res 34(4):833–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay MD (1992) Latin hypercube sampling as a tool in uncertainty analysis of computer models. In: Proceedings of the 24th conference on winter simulation. Association for Computing Machinery, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed AMO, Cote K (1999) Decision analysis of polluted sites—a fuzzy set approach. J Waste Manag 19:519–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos YA, Theodosiou N, Mylopoulos NA (1999) A stochastic optimization approach in the design of an aquifer remediation under hydrogeologic uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 13(5):335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nait-Said R, Zidani F, Ouzraoui N (2008) Fuzzy risk graph model for determining safety integrity level. International Journal of Quality, Statistics, and Reliability 2008:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pebesma EJ, Heuvelink GBM (1999) Latin hypercube sampling of Gaussian random fields. Technometrics 41:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH (2008) Characterizing uncertainties associated with contaminant transport modeling through a coupled fuzzy-stochastic approach. Water Air Soil Pollut 197(1–4):331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Huang YF, Zeng GM, Chakma A (2006) NRSRM: a decision support system and visualization software for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites. Energy Sources, Part A 28(1–3):199–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Chakma A (2007) A stepwise-inference-based optimization system for supporting remediation of petroleum-contaminated sites. Water Air Soil Pollut 185(1–4):349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Chakma A (2008a) Optimization of dual-phase vacuum extraction to remove nonaqueous phase liquids in subsurface. Water Resour Res 44:W04422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Li YP (2008b) Risk management of BTEX contamination in ground water—an integrated fuzzy approach. Ground Water 46(5):755–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Yu H (2009) Enhancing remediation of LNAPL recovery through a response-surface-based optimization approach. Journal of Environmental Engineering (ASCE) 135(10):999–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Liu L (2010) A genetic-algorithm-aided chance-constrained programming model for regional air quality management under uncertainty. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 60(1):63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinsky RA, Young RJ, Smith AB (1981) Leukemia in benzene workers. Am J Ind Med 2:217–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinsky RA, Smith AB, Horning R (1987) Benzene and leukemia: an epidemiologic risk assessment. N Engl J Med 316:1044–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuntjens P (2002) Field-scale cadmium transport in a heterogeneous layered soil. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 140(1–4):401–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodossiou NP (2004) Application of non-linear simulation and optimization models in groundwater aquifer management. Water Resour Manage 18(2):125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U S Environmental Protection Agency) (1992) Guidelines for exposure assessment. EPA 600Z-92-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U S Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Toxicological review of xylenes (CAS No. 1330-20-7). National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USOHEA (US Office of Health and Environmental Assessment) (1989) Exposure factors handbook. Report No. EPA /600/8-89/043. US Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss GD, Jorgensen KH (1998) A user’s guide to LHS: Sandia’s Latin hypercube sampling software. Technical Report SAND98-0210. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS, Cao MF (2009a) SRCCP: a stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(6):352–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS (2009b) An inexact two-stage stochastic robust optimization model for water resources management under uncertainty. Environ Eng Sci 26(12):1765–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS, Cao MF, Sun Y (2009c) An interval-parameter robust optimization model for supporting municipal solid waste management under uncertainty. Waste Manage 30(2):316–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS, Huang Y (2009d) SRFILP: a stochastic robust fuzzy interval linear programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty. J Environ Inform 14(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. H. Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, A.L., Huang, G.H. & Qin, X.S. An Integrated Simulation-Assessment Approach for Evaluating Health Risks of Groundwater Contamination Under Multiple Uncertainties. Water Resour Manage 24, 3349–3369 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9610-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9610-3

Keywords

Navigation