Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Controlling Gully Advancement and Models Evaluation (Hableh Rood Basin, Iran)

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gully erosion is one of the most complicated and destructive forms of water erosion. In order to prevent this erosion, the important factors controlling gully heads must be understood. This paper examines gully head advancement in the Hableh Rood Basin, Iran by (1) observing gully head advance between 1957 and 2005 using field studies, aerial photography and GIS analysis and: (2) applying and evaluating widely used experimental models including the, Thompson (Trans ASAE 7(1):54–55, 1964), SCS (I) and SCS (II) models, for estimating migrating headcuts over the study period. The results showed that the highest mean gully advancement (0.26 m year − 1) took place during the 1956–1967 period, with most gullies having lower and steady headcut retreat rates between 1967–2000 (0.21 m year − 1) and 2000–2005 (0.15 m year − 1). This suggests that the majority of gullies in the study area were still in the early stages of formation in the first study period and their formation may be linked to land use or climatic changes pre 1956. Analysis of the correlation between environmental characteristics of the study area and gully advancement indicated that the upslope area of head cuts and soluble mineral content of the soil were the two most important factors influencing the spatial and temporal variation of gully longitudinal development. Results of multiple regression revealed that the simple relation including upslope area and soluble minerals can explain 93% of total variance and relatively reflects the effects of runoff and waterfall process for headcut retreat. Application of statistical error analysis to evaluate the four gully advancement models showed that in comparison to other models, the second model of SCS has more reliable results for predicting longitudinal gully advancement in this study area and other similar regions. However, this study indicates that future modelling in the region should consider the role of soil soluble mineral content in predicting gully advancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi H (1999) Applied geomorphology, vol 1 (water erosion), 3rd edn. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, p 688 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer CE, Johnson HP (1963) Factors in gully growth in the deep loess area of western Iowa. Trans ASAE 6(3):237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts HD, De Rosel RC (1999) Digital elevation models as a tool for monitoring and measuring gully erosion. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 1(2):91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkard MB, Kostaschuk RA (1997) Patterns and control of gully growth along the shoreline of lake Huron. Earth Surf Process Landf 22:901–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PJJ, Poesen J, Govers G, Vandaele K (1999) Importance of slope gradient and contributing area for optimal prediction of the initiation and trajectory of ephemeral gullies. Catena 37:377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felfoar M, Boussema S (1999) Assessment of the influence of the lithology and rainfall events on gully erosion in Owed maize watershed in central Tunisia. 2nd inters regional conference in environmental-water, p 99

  • Gallart F, Sole A, Puigdefabregas J, Lazaro R (2002) Badland system in the Mediterranean. In: Bull LJ, Kirkby MJ (ed) Dryl and rivers: hydrology and geomorphology of semi-arid channels. Wiley, Chichester, pp 299–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffari AR (1998) Aerospace techniques applied to gully erosion studied in Shahre-kord, Iran. MSc dissertation, ITC, Enschedule, The Netherlands, pp 113

  • Ghoddousi J (1994) Gully growth and extend. Research Institute of Forest and Rangelands, Final research report, p 28, (abstract in English)

  • Ghoddousi J (2002) Gully erosion morphology modeling and hazard zonation (studied area: Zanjanrood drainage basin). PhD dissertation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, pp 368 (abstract in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Andersen RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionita I (2006) Gully development in the Moldavian Plateau of Romania. Catena 68:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi M (1997) A study on effective factors of gully erosion and introducing methods to prevent it in Zahan-e-Ghaen area. MSc dissertation, Faculty of Agricultural, Tarbiat Modarres University, p 192 (abstract in English)

  • Krause AK, Franks SW, Kalam JD, Loughran RJ, Rowan JS (2003) Multi-parameter fingerprinting of sediment deposition in a small gullied catchment in SE Australia. Catena 53:372–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP (1964) Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Freeman, London, p 522

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) Landscape dissection and drainage area-slope thresholds. In: Kirkby MJ (ed) Process models and theoretical geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 221–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortazaii G (2005) Evaluation of the quantitative effects of environmental parameters on occurrence of gully erosion in order to introduce the most relevant estimation model for longitudinal development of gully. PhD dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, p 154, (abstract in English)

  • Nachtergaele J, Poesen J, Vandekerckhove L, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Roxo M (2001) Testing the ephemeral gully erosion model (EGEM) for two Mediterranean environments. Earth Surf Processes Landf 26:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtergaele J, Poesen J, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Vandekerckhove L (2002) Medium-term evolution of a gully developed in a loess-derived soil. Geomorphology 46(3–4):223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oostwoud Wijdenes DJ, Poesen J, Vandekerckhove L, Ghesquiere M (2000) Spatial distribution of gully head activity and sediment supply along an ephemeral channel in a Mediterranean environment. Catena 39:147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra KC (2001) Hydrology and water resources engineering. Alpha Science International Ltd., Pangbourne, p 561

  • Poesen J, Nachtergale J, Vertstraeten G, Valentin C (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs. Catena 50(2–4):91–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radoane M, Ichim I, Radoane N (1995) Gully distribution and development in Moldavia, Romania. Catena 24:127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA, Mosely MP, Weaver WE (1987) Experimental fluvial geomorphology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I (1966) Gully development and sediment yield. J Hydrol 4:236–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorchuk A (1999) Dynamic and static models of gully erosion. Catena 37:401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR (1964) Quantitative effect of watershed variables on rate of gully-head advancement. Trans ASAE 7(1):54–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker GE, Lancaster ST, Gasparini NM, Bras RL (2001) The Channel-Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development (CHILD) model. In: Harmon RS, Doe WW (ed) Landscape erosion and evolution modeling. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 349–388

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1966) Procedure for determining rates of land damage, land depreciation and volume of sediment produced by Gully Erosion. USDA Soil Conservation Service Technical Release No. 32, p 18

  • USDA, NRCS (1998) Keys to soil taxonomy, 8th edn. Soil Survey Staff, Washington

  • Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Nachtergaele J, Kosmas C, Roxo MJ, Figueiredo TDE (2000) Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe. Earth Surf Processes Landf 25:1201–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Gyssels G (2001) Short-term bank gully retreat rates in Mediterranean environments. Catena 44:133–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Govers G (2003) Medium-term gully headcut retreat rates in Southeast Spain determined from aerial photographs and ground measurements. Catena 50:329–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandaele K, Poesen J, Govers G, van Wesemael B (1996) Geomorphic threshold conditions for ephemeral gully incision. Geomorphology 16(2):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y (2005) Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control. Catena 63:132–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vente JD, Poesen J, Arabkhedri M, Verstraeten G (2007) The sediment delivery problem revisited. Prog Phys Geogr 31(2)1:155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson RJ, Olive LJ, Rosewell CJ (1996) Rates of erosion and sediment transport in Australia. IAHS Publications 236, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson RJ, Caitcheon G, Murray AS, McCulloch M, Quade J (2002) Sourcing sediment using multiple tracers in the catchment of Lake Argyle, Nortwestern Australia. Environ Manage 29(4):634–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward DE (1999) Method to predict cropland ephemeral gully erosion. Catena 37:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Arid and Mountainous Region Reclamation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, P.O. Box 31585-4314, Iran

    Aliakbar Nazari Samani, Hassan Ahmadi & Ali Salajegheh

  2. Research and Science Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Aliasghar Mohammadi & Razieh Pishyar

  3. Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

    Jamal Ghoddousi

  4. School of Science and Primary Industries, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, 0909, Australia

    Guy Boggs

Authors
  1. Aliakbar Nazari Samani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hassan Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aliasghar Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jamal Ghoddousi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ali Salajegheh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guy Boggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Razieh Pishyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aliakbar Nazari Samani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nazari Samani, A., Ahmadi, H., Mohammadi, A. et al. Factors Controlling Gully Advancement and Models Evaluation (Hableh Rood Basin, Iran). Water Resour Manage 24, 1531–1549 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9512-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9512-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation