Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Growth, biomass allocation, morphology, and photosynthesis of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and its native congeners grown at four irradiances

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eupatorium adenophorum is one of the more noxious invasive plants worldwide. However, the mechanisms underlying its invasiveness are still not well elucidated. In this study, we compared the invader with its two native congeners (E. heterophyllum and E. japonicum) at four irradiances in terms of growth, biomass allocation, morphology, and photosynthesis. The higher light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Pmax) and total leaf area of the invader may contribute to its higher relative growth rate (RGR) and total biomass compared with its native congeners. Total biomass and RGR increased significantly with the increase of Pmax and total leaf area. The higher support organ mass fraction and the lower root mass fraction of the invader may also contribute to its higher RGR and biomass through increasing carbon assimilation and reducing respiratory carbon loss, respectively. The higher growth rate of the invader increased its total leaf area, ramet number, and crown area. These traits may help the invader to form dense monoculture, outshading native plant species. However, consistently higher leaf area ratio, specific leaf area, and leaf mass fraction were not found across irradiances for the invader compared with its native congeners. Higher plasticity in response to irradiance was also not found for the invader. The invader retained advantages over the natives across irradiances, while its performance decreased with lower irradiance. The results indicate that the invader may be one of the few super invaders. Reducing irradiance may inhibit its invasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akinnifesi FK, Kang BT, Ladipo DO (1999) Structural root form and fine root distribution of some woody species evaluated for agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 42:121–138. doi:10.1023/A:1006178002019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annapurna C, Singh JS (2003) Variation of Parthenium hysterophorus in response to soil quality: implications for invasiveness. Weed Res 43:190–198. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00332.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JH (2004) A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers Distrib 10:387–397. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00105.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JH, Winn AA (2006) A comparison of plastic responses to competition by invasive and non-invasive congeners in the Commelinaceae. Biol Invasions 8:797–807. doi:10.1007/s10530-005-3838-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernusak LA, Marshall JD (2000) Photosynthetic refixation in branches of western white pine. Funct Ecol 14:300–311. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00436.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW (1986) Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rain forest species I. Induction under constant and fluctuating light conditions. Oecologia 69:517–523. doi:10.1007/BF00410357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (1995) Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Hughes RF, Vitousek PM (2001) Factors influencing dynamics of invasive C4 grasses in Hawaiian woodland, role of resource competition and priority effects. Ecology 82:89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Kark S (2002) Impacts and extent of biotic invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 17:202–204. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02454-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183–211. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y-L, Auge H, Ebeling SK (2007a) Invasive Buddleja davidii allocates more nitrogen to its photosynthetic machinery than five native woody species. Oecologia 153:501–510. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0759-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y-L, Wang J-F, Sang W-G (2007b) Biomass allocation, morphology and photosynthesis of invasive and noninvasive exotic species grown at four irradiance levels. Acta Oecol 31:40–47. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2006.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y-L (2008) Photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation and specific leaf area in invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and native Eupatorium japonicum grown at different irradiances. Physiol Plant 133:318–326. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01072.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y-L, Fu G-L (2008) Nitrogen allocation, partitioning and use efficiency in three invasive plant species in comparison to their native congeners. Biol Invasions 10:891–902. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9240-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y-L, Fu G-L, Zheng Y-L (2008) Specific leaf area relates to the differences in leaf construction cost, photosynthesis, nitrogen allocation and use efficiencies between invasive and noninvasive alien congeners. Planta 228:383–390. doi:10.1007/s00425-008-0732-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D (1987) Neighborhood competition in an old field plant community. Ecology 68:1211–1223. doi:10.2307/1939205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am Nat 159:396–419. doi:10.1086/338995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M (2007) High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. Am J Bot 94:526–532. doi:10.3732/ajb.94.4.526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z-F, Deng Q-Y, Wu Z-L, Huang F (2008) Distribution of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum along the Yangtze valley. Yangtze River 39:31–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM, Turner CL (1998) Patterns and controls of aboveground net primary production in tallgrass prairie. In: Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL (eds) Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 193–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge D (1993) Biological invasions, lessons from ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8:133–137. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90025-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdowell SCL (2002) Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). Am J Bot 89:1431–1438. doi:10.3732/ajb.89.9.1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel JM, Griffin KL (2001) Construction cost and invasive potential: comparing Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae) with cooccurring native species along pond banks. Am J Bot 88:2252–2258. doi:10.2307/3558387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison RR, Goldstein G, Ares A (1998) Growth, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of invasive and native Hawaiian rain-forest species. Oecologia 117:449–459. doi:10.1007/s004420050680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter L (1999) Growth responses of 15 rain forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct Ecol 13:396–410. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00332.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter L (2001) Light-dependent changes in biomass allocation and their importance for growth of rain forest tree species. Funct Ecol 15:113–123. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00503.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B (2006) Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta-analysis. Funct Ecol 20:565–574. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01135.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y-H, Feng Y-L, Liu C (2007) Addition of activated charcoal to soil after clearing Ageratina adenophora stimulates growth of forbs and grasses in China. Trop Grasslands 41:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Valladares F, Wright SJ, Lasso E, Kitajima K, Pearcy RW (2000) Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest. Ecology 81:1925–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1986) Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? Ecol Stud 58:163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Wang YZ (2006) Invasion dynamics and potential spread of the invasive alien plant species Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) in China. Divers Distrib 12:397–408. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00250.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W-J, Zu Y-G, Meng Q-H, Yang F-J, Zhao Z-H, Cao J-G (2005) CO2 exchange characteristics of adenophorum Eupatorium Spreng. Acta Ecol Sin 25:1898–1907 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E, Schmid B (1998) Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. Am J Bot 85:1110–1121. doi:10.2307/2446344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DG, Black RA (1994) Drought response of a native and introduced Hawaiian grass. Oecologia 97:512–519. doi:10.1007/BF00325890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DG, Mack RN, Black RA (1995) Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology 76:1569–1580. doi:10.2307/1938158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsey BJ, Polley HW (2006) Aboveground productivity and root-shoot allocation differ between native and introduced grass species. Oecologia 150:300–309. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0515-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zou J, Rogers WE, Siemann E (2007) Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum. Funct Ecol 21:721–730. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01298.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Chang-Long Zhang for his assistance in measurements, and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This study was funded by the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (30670394, 30830027), the Applied Basic Study Project of Yunnan Province, and the National Basic Research Program of China (2002CB111400).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Long Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, YL., Feng, YL., Liu, WX. et al. Growth, biomass allocation, morphology, and photosynthesis of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and its native congeners grown at four irradiances. Plant Ecol 203, 263–271 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9544-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9544-5

Keywords

Navigation