Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Making Sen’s capability approach operational: a random scale framework

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amartya Sen has developed the so-called capability approach to meet the criticism that income alone may be insufficient as a measure of economic inequality. This is because knowledge about people’s income does not tell us what they are able to acquire with that income. For example, people with the same income may not have the same access to health and transportation services, schools and opportunities in the labor market. Recently, there has been growing interest in empirical studies based on the capability approach. Most of these, however, are only loosely related to quantitative behavioral theory, at least in a concrete and empirically operational way. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the theory of random scale (utility) models offers a powerful theoretical and empirical framework for representing and accounting for key aspects of Sen’s theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczél J., Roberts R. S., Rosenbaum Z. (1986) On scientific laws without dimensional constants. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 119: 389–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand P., Hunter G., Smith R. (2005) Capabilities and wellbeing: Evidence based on the Sen–Nussbaum approach to welfare. Social Indicators Research 79: 9–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand P., Santos C., Smith R. (2008) The measurement of capabilities. In: Basu K., Kanbur R. (Eds.), Arguments for a better world: Essays in honour of Amartya Sen. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs S., Cardell S., Hausman J. (1981) Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics 16: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M., Watanatada T. (1981) Application of a continuous spatial choice logit model. In: McFadden D., Manski C. (Eds.), Structural Analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagsvik J. K. (1994) Discrete and continuous choice, max-stable processes and independence from irrelevant attributes. Econometrica 62: 1179–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagsvik J. K. (1995) How large is the class of generalized extreme value random utility models?. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 39: 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagsvik J. K., Karlström A. (2005) Compensating variation and Hicksian choice probabilities in random utility models that are nonlinear in income. Review of Economic Studies 72: 57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagsvik J. K., Strøm S. (2006) Sectoral labor supply, choice restrictions and functional form. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21: 803–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagsvik J. K., Jia Z., Strøm S. (2006) Utility of income as a random function: Behavioral characterization and empirical evidence. Mathematical Social Sciences 51: 23–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J., Sen A. (2002) India: Development and participation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne J.-C. (1985) Elements of psychophysical theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne J.-C., Narens L. (1983) Scales and meaningfulness of quantitative laws. Synthese 55: 287–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn C., Heckman J. J. (1982) New methods for analyzing structural models of labor force dynamics. Journal of Econometrics 18: 115–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. M. (1956). The it demand for related goods. Journal paper J3129 (Ames, IA: Iowa Experimental Station).

  • Hanemann W. M. (1984) Discrete/continuous choice of consumer demand. Econometrica 52: 541–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn A., Wansbeck T. (1985) The individual welfare function: A review. Journal of Economic Psychology 6: 333–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuklys W. (2005) Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Theoretical insights and empirical applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster K. J. (1966) A new approach to consumer demand. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D. (2000) Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luce R. D. (1959a) Individual choice behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce R. D. (1959b) On the possible psychophysical laws. Psychological Review 66: 81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce R. D., Suppes P. (1965) Preference, utility and subjective probability. In: Luce R. D., Bush R. R., Galanter E. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D. (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (Eds.), Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D. (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location, Chapter 3. In: Karlqvist A., Lundqvist L., Snickars F., Weibull J. (Eds.), Spatial interaction theory and residential location. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D. (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: Manski C. F., McFadden D. (Eds.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D. (1984) Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In: Griliches Z., Intriligator M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D. (2001) Economic choices. American Economic Review 91: 351–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M. C. (1999) Sex and social justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick S. I. (1987) Extreme values, regular variation and point processes. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts F. S., Rosenbaum Z. (1986) Scale type, meaningfulness, and the possible psychophysical laws. Mathematical Social Sciences 12: 77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns I. (2005) The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development 6: 93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns I. (2006) The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy 14: 351–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1979) Personal utilities and public judgments: Or what’s wrong with welfare economics. Economic Journal 89: 537–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1980) Equality of what?. In: McMurrin S. (Ed.), The tanner lectures on human values. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1982) Choice, welfare and measurement. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1984) Rights and capabilities. In: Sen A. K. (Ed.), Resources, values and development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1985a) Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1985b) Social choice theory. In: Arrow A., Intriligator M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1987) The standard of living. In: Hawthorn G. (Ed.), The standard of living. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1991) Welfare, preference, and freedom. Journal of Econometrics 50: 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1992) Inequality re-examined. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M., Sen A. K. (Eds.), The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. K. (1997) From income inequality of economic inequality. Southern Economic Journal 64: 384–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1998). Welfare Economics and the Quality of Life. Chung-Hua series of lectures by invited eminent economists, no 24. Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica. Nankan, Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Sen A. K. (2002) Rationality and freedom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (1993) Welfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of inequality reexamined, by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic Literature 31: 1947–1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone L. L. (1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 79: 281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A. (1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review 76: 31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herwaarden F. G., Kapteyn A. (1981) Empirical comparisons of the shape of welfare functions. European Economic Review 15: 261–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herwaarden F. G., Kapteyn A., Praag B. M. S. (1977) Twelve thousand individual welfare functions. European Economic Review 9: 283–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag B. M. S. (1968) Individual welfare functions and consumer behavior: A theory of rational irrationality. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag B. M. S. (1971) The welfare function of income in Belgium: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review 2: 337–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag B. M. S. (1991) Ordinal and cardinal utility: An integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept. Journal of Econometrics 50: 60–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag B. M. S. (1993) The relativity of the welfare concept. In: Nussbaum M., Sen A. (Eds.), The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Department, Statistics Norway, and the Frisch Centre for Economic Research, Oslo, Norway

    John K. Dagsvik

Authors
  1. John K. Dagsvik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John K. Dagsvik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dagsvik, J.K. Making Sen’s capability approach operational: a random scale framework. Theory Decis 74, 75–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9340-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9340-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation