Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structuralism as a philosophy of mathematical practice

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares the statement ‘Mathematics is the study of structure’ with the actual practice of mathematics. We present two examples from contemporary mathematical practice where the notion of structure plays different roles. In the first case a structure is defined over a certain set. It is argued firstly that this set may not be regarded as a structure and secondly that what is important to mathematical practice is the relation that exists between the structure and the set. In the second case, from algebraic topology, one point is that an object can be a place in different structures. Which structure one chooses to place the object in depends on what one wishes to do with it. Overall the paper argues that mathematics certainly deals with structures, but that structures may not be all there is to mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atiyah M.F. (1974). How research is carried out. Bullet in of IMA 10: 232–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Awodey S. (2004). An answer to Hellman’s question: ‘Does Category theory provide a framework for mathematical structuralism?’. Philosophia Mathematica 12: 54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benacerraf P. (1965). What numbers could not be. Philosophical Review 74: 47–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourbaki N. (1950). The architecture of mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly 57: 221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter J. (2005). Individuation of objects - A problem for structuralism?. Synthese 143: 291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chihara C. (2004). A structural account of mathematics. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett M. (1991). Frege: Philosophy of mathematics. London, Duckworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilenberg S. (1969). The algebraization of mathematics. In Boehm G. (ed). The mathematical sciences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp. 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilenberg S., Steenrod N. (1952). Foundations of algebraic topology. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale B. (1996). Structuralism’s unpaid epistemological debts. Philosophica Mathematica 4: 124–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman G. (1989). Mathematics without numbers. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry E., Marquis J.-P. (2005). Categories in context: Historical, foundational, and philosophical. Philosophia Mathematica 13: 1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Lane S. (1996). Structure in mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 4: 174–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu P. (2001). Mathematical explanation: Problems and prospects. Topoi 20: 97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis J.-P. (1997). Abstract mathematical tools and machines for mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 5: 250–272

    Google Scholar 

  • McLarty C. (1993). Numbers can be just what they have to. Nous 27: 487–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons C. (1990). The structuralist view of mathemtical objects. In Hart W.D. (ed). Philosophy of mathematics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 272–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons C. (2004). Structuralism and metaphysics. The Philosophical Quarterly 54: 56–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranicki A., Yamasaki M. (1995). Controlled K-theory. Topology and Its Applications 61: 1–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik M. (1997). Mathematics as a science of patterns. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (1996). Space, number and structure: A tale of two debates. Philosophia Mathematica 3: 148–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics. structure and ontology. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (2005). Categories, structures, and the Frege-Hilbert controversy: The status of meta-mathematics. Philosophia Mathamatica 13: 61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (forthcoming) Structure and identity, to appear in F. Mac Bride & C. Wright (Eds), Identity and modality: New essays in metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

  • Steiner M. (1978). Mathematical explanation. Philosophical Studies 34: 135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart I. (2004). Galois theory. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall (CRS)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead J.H.C. (1939). Simplicial spaces, nuclei and m-groups. Proceedings of London Mathematical Society 45: 243–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Jessica Carter

Authors
  1. Jessica Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Carter.

Additional information

I wish to thank Colin McLarty as well as the anonymous referees for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, J. Structuralism as a philosophy of mathematical practice. Synthese 163, 119–131 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9169-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9169-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation