Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementing a Multidimensional Poverty Measure Using Mixed Methods and a Participatory Framework

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, there have been advances in the development of multidimensional poverty measures. Work is needed however on how to implement such measures. This paper deals with the process of selecting dimensions and setting weights in multidimensional poverty measurement using qualitative and quantitative methods in a participatory framework. We estimate the multidimensional poverty measures developed by Alkire and Foster for a particular group: persons with psychiatric diagnoses in the United States. To select relevant dimensions and their relative ordering, two discussion groups are convened: one consisting of persons with lived-experience expertise and the other consisting of people with mental health service provision or research expertise. Several methods are used to convert dimension rankings into weights. The selection and ordering of dimensions differed between the two discussion groups, as did the resulting poverty measures. For instance, the poverty headcount using the dimensions and weights of the ‘lived experience’ group ranged from 20.61 to 26.96% as compared to a range of 18.62–33.19% using those of the ‘provider/researcher’ group. One of the main results of this study is that the Alkire Foster method is sensitive to the selection of dimensions and the methods used to derive rankings and weights. It points toward the limitation of relying exclusively on small scale qualitative methods for the selection and ranking of dimensions. In addition, the participatory framework used in this study was found to be essential in interpreting results, in particular with respect to the limitations of the data set in measuring relevant dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The various possible processes to select dimensions are reviewed in Alkire (2007), while those to set weights are presented in Decancq and Lugo (2008).

  2. Alkire (2002a, b) reviews several such lists including John Rawls’ list of primary goods, Doyal and Gough’s list of needs and Martha Nussbaum’s list of capabilities.

  3. Nussbaum (2000)’s list includes: (1) Life: not dying prematurely. (2) Bodily health: to have good health, adequate nutrition and shelter. (3) Bodily integrity, including physical mobility. (4) Senses, imagination, and thought: including being able to use the senses, to imagine, think and reason. (5) Emotions: including being able to have attachments to things and people outside ourselves. (6) Practical reason: including being able to form a conception of the good. (7) Affiliation: including social interactions. (8) Other species: “Being able to live with concern for and in relation to animals, plants and the world of nature”. (9) Play: “Being able to laugh, to play, to enjoy recreational activities.” 10. Control over one’s environment. (A) Political: including political participation; (B) Material: “Being able to hold property …; having the right to seek employment on an equal basis as others…”.

  4. It should be noted that studies could be participatory for few selected steps of a research process, and rely only on researchers’ input for the other steps.

  5. Seminar participants meet monthly to learn about and discuss issues related to the well being of persons with psychiatric diagnoses in the context of the capability approach. Participants are therefore aware of the capability approach and its multidimensional understanding to well being.

  6. The invitation provided the study question, a definition of poverty in the context of the capability approach and an overview of the type of information collected in the MEPS.

  7. We used 61 years as the cut-off point instead of 64 to avoid including persons who have transitioned to early retirement under the Social Security Administration Old Age program. Our study contains only individuals who responded during each round of 2001 for all of the questions related to our variables of interest. We also excluded part year observations (e.g., individuals who died during the calendar year, individuals who could not be located).

  8. Substracting OOPS from income before comparing income to the poverty line has been recommended by the National Academy of Sciences (Citro and Michael 1995). Poverty is to be measured based on available resources: because medical OOPS must be paid, they are not part of available resources and should be netted out of income before it is compared to the poverty line. Evidence that OOPS can throw families under the poverty line in the US is well established (e.g., O’Hara 2004).

  9. A survey was recently used to have people rank poverty dimensions in the Maldives (de Kruijk and Rutten 2007).

References

  • Addington, J., & Addington, D. (1999). Neurocognitive and social functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25(1), 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfares, H. K., & Duffuaa, S. O. (2008). Determining aggregate criteria weights from criteria rankings by a group of decision makers. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 7(4), 769–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfares, H. K., & Duffuaa, S. O. (2009). Assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision making based on ordinal ranking. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15(5–6), 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2002a). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2002b). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2007). Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty. In N. Kakwanit & J. Silber (Eds.), The many dimensions of poverty (pp. 89–119). New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (7–8), 476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. Working paper 38. Oxford poverty and human development initiative.

  • Baldwin, M. L., & Marcus, S. C. (2007). Labor market outcomes of persons with mental disorders. Industrial Relations, 46, 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banthin, J. S., & Bernard, D. M. (2006). Changes in financial burdens for health care: National estimates for the population younger than 65 years, 1996–2003. JAMA, 296, 2712–2719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L. (2006). Children—conceptualizing their capabilities: Results of a survey conducted during the first children’s world congress on child labour. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 77(1), 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslau, J., Miller, E., Joanie Chung, W. J., & Schweitzer, J. B. (2011). Childhood and adolescent onset psychiatric disorders, substance use, and failure to graduate high school on time. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(3), 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhauser, R., Houtenvile, A., & Rovba, L. (2009). Poverty. In counting working-age people with disabilities (pp. 192–226). Kalamazoo, MI: Up John Institute for Employment Research.

  • Chambers, R. (2003). The best of both worlds. In Kanbur, R. (Ed.).

  • Chambers, R. (2007). Participation and Poverty. Development, 50(2), 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citro, C. F. & Michael, R. T. (1995). Measuring poverty: A new approach. Panel on poverty and family assistance: Concepts, information needs, and measurement methods. National Research Council.

  • Colton, C. W., & Manderscheid, R. W. (2007). Congruencies in increased mortality rates, years of potential life lost, and causes of death among public mental health clients in eight states. Preventing Chronic Disease, 3(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. A. (2006). Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities: Update of a report for the president’s commission. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1391–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kruijk, H. & Rutten, M. (2007). Weighting dimensions of poverty based on peoples priorities: Constructing a composite poverty index for the Maldives. Q-squared working paper 35. Toronto: Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto.

  • Decancq, K. & Lugo, M. A. (2008). Setting weights in multidimensional indices of well being and deprivation. Background working paper for the Oxford poverty and human development initiative workshop on weighting dimensions, Oxford, UK, 26–27 May 2008.

  • Dickerson, F. B., Boronow, J. J., Ringel, N., & Parente, F. (1999). Social functioning and neurocognitive deficits in outpatients with schizophrenia: A 2-year follow-up. Schizophrenia Research, 37(1), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, B., Azeni, H., Weiss, R., & Sederer, L. (2000). Schizophrenia, substance use disorders and medical co-morbidity. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 3, 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druss, B. G., & Rosenheck, R. A. (1998). Mental disorders and access to medical care in the United States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(12), 1775–1777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A., & Ring, K. (1965). The influence of perceived mental illness on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 70, 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferketich, A. K., & Binkley, P. F. (2005). Psychological distress and cardiovascular disease: Results from the 2002 national health interview survey. European Heart Journal, 26(18), 1923–1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, K., & Lincoln, A. (2009). Participation in public mental health research: A conceptual framework and report from practice. In J. Wallcroft, B. Schrank, & M. Amering (Eds.), Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research (pp. 73–86). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J., Eisenberg, D., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2010). Consequences of receipt of a psychiatric diagnosis for completion of college. Psychiatric Services, 61, 399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N. & Silber, J. (Eds.) (2008). Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Kanbur, R. (Ed). (2003). Q squared: Qualitative and quantitative methods of poverty appraisal. India: Orient Blackswan.

  • Kessler, R. C., Heeringa, S., Lakoma, M. D., Petukhova, M., Rupp, A., Schoenbaum, M., et al. (2008). Individuals and societal effects of mental disorder on earnings in the United States: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 703–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCook, B., McGuire, T. G., Lock, K., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2010). Comparing methods of racial and ethnic disparities measurement across different settings of mental health care. Health Services Research, 45, 825–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F., & Cordray, D. S. (1993). Prevalence of alcohol, drug and mental disorders among the homeless. Contemporary Drug Problems, 20, 355–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderscheid, R., Druss, B., & Freeman, E. (2008). Data to manage the mortality crisis. International Journal of Mental Health, 37(2), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, F. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39(4), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us? Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Nicholson, J., Biebel, K., Hinden, B., Henry, A., & Stier, L. (2001a). Critical issues for parents with mental illness and their families. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, J., Larkin, C., Simon, L., & Banks, S. (2001b). The prevalence of parenting among adults with mental illness. Working paper. Massachusetts: Center for Mental Health Services Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School.

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, B. (2004). Do medical out-of-pocket expenses thrust families into poverty? Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 15(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piatt, E. E., Munetz, M. R., & Ritter, C. (2010). An examination of premature mortality among decedents with serious mental illness and those in the general population. Psychiatric Services, 61(7), 663–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L. A., Dey, A. N., & Cohen, A. J. (2007). Characteristics of adults with serious psychological distress as measured by the K6 scale. Advance Data, 382, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2006). The capabilities approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1997). On economic inequality. New York: Clarendon Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, C., Samuels, J., Tang, D.-I., Berg, I., Jones, K., & Hopper, J. (2006). Tenant outcomes in supported housing and community residences in New York City. Psychiatric Services, 57, 982–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. (2001). Book review of women and human development by Martha Nussbaum. Journal of International Development, 13, 1189–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. J. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A., McClelland, G. M., Abram, K. A., & Weiner, D. A. (2005a). Crime victimization in adults with severe mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 911–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teplin, L. A., McClelland, G. M., Abram, K. M., & Weiner, D. A. (2005b). Crime victimization in adults with severe mental illness comparison with the national crime victimization survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(8), 911–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trani, J.-F., Biggeri, M. & Mauro, V. (Forthcoming). The Multidimensionality of child poverty: Evidence from Afghanistan. Social Indicators Research.

  • Vick, B., Jones, K., & Mitra, S. (2010). Poverty and psychiatric diagnosis in the U.S.: Evidence from the medical expenditure panel survey. Fordham, Working paper.

  • Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., & Eng, E. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Summary, evidence report/technology assessment: number 99. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the Center to Study Recovery in Social Contexts, funded by a 5 year NIH grant P20MH078188 to Dr. Alexander.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Mitra.

Additional information

We have benefited from insightful comments on an earlier version by Sabina Alkire, Kim Hopper, and seminar participants at the 2009 New Approaches in Welfare Conference (Oxford University), the 2009 American Public Health Association meeting and the 2010 National Institute of Mental Health Biennial Economics Conference, Fordham University and the Center to Study Recovery in Social Contexts.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Distribution of deprivations among persons with psychiatric diagnoses

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitra, S., Jones, K., Vick, B. et al. Implementing a Multidimensional Poverty Measure Using Mixed Methods and a Participatory Framework. Soc Indic Res 110, 1061–1081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9972-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9972-9

Keywords

Navigation