Abstract
Recently, there have been advances in the development of multidimensional poverty measures. Work is needed however on how to implement such measures. This paper deals with the process of selecting dimensions and setting weights in multidimensional poverty measurement using qualitative and quantitative methods in a participatory framework. We estimate the multidimensional poverty measures developed by Alkire and Foster for a particular group: persons with psychiatric diagnoses in the United States. To select relevant dimensions and their relative ordering, two discussion groups are convened: one consisting of persons with lived-experience expertise and the other consisting of people with mental health service provision or research expertise. Several methods are used to convert dimension rankings into weights. The selection and ordering of dimensions differed between the two discussion groups, as did the resulting poverty measures. For instance, the poverty headcount using the dimensions and weights of the ‘lived experience’ group ranged from 20.61 to 26.96% as compared to a range of 18.62–33.19% using those of the ‘provider/researcher’ group. One of the main results of this study is that the Alkire Foster method is sensitive to the selection of dimensions and the methods used to derive rankings and weights. It points toward the limitation of relying exclusively on small scale qualitative methods for the selection and ranking of dimensions. In addition, the participatory framework used in this study was found to be essential in interpreting results, in particular with respect to the limitations of the data set in measuring relevant dimensions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Nussbaum (2000)’s list includes: (1) Life: not dying prematurely. (2) Bodily health: to have good health, adequate nutrition and shelter. (3) Bodily integrity, including physical mobility. (4) Senses, imagination, and thought: including being able to use the senses, to imagine, think and reason. (5) Emotions: including being able to have attachments to things and people outside ourselves. (6) Practical reason: including being able to form a conception of the good. (7) Affiliation: including social interactions. (8) Other species: “Being able to live with concern for and in relation to animals, plants and the world of nature”. (9) Play: “Being able to laugh, to play, to enjoy recreational activities.” 10. Control over one’s environment. (A) Political: including political participation; (B) Material: “Being able to hold property …; having the right to seek employment on an equal basis as others…”.
It should be noted that studies could be participatory for few selected steps of a research process, and rely only on researchers’ input for the other steps.
Seminar participants meet monthly to learn about and discuss issues related to the well being of persons with psychiatric diagnoses in the context of the capability approach. Participants are therefore aware of the capability approach and its multidimensional understanding to well being.
The invitation provided the study question, a definition of poverty in the context of the capability approach and an overview of the type of information collected in the MEPS.
We used 61 years as the cut-off point instead of 64 to avoid including persons who have transitioned to early retirement under the Social Security Administration Old Age program. Our study contains only individuals who responded during each round of 2001 for all of the questions related to our variables of interest. We also excluded part year observations (e.g., individuals who died during the calendar year, individuals who could not be located).
Substracting OOPS from income before comparing income to the poverty line has been recommended by the National Academy of Sciences (Citro and Michael 1995). Poverty is to be measured based on available resources: because medical OOPS must be paid, they are not part of available resources and should be netted out of income before it is compared to the poverty line. Evidence that OOPS can throw families under the poverty line in the US is well established (e.g., O’Hara 2004).
A survey was recently used to have people rank poverty dimensions in the Maldives (de Kruijk and Rutten 2007).
References
Addington, J., & Addington, D. (1999). Neurocognitive and social functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25(1), 173–182.
Alfares, H. K., & Duffuaa, S. O. (2008). Determining aggregate criteria weights from criteria rankings by a group of decision makers. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 7(4), 769–781.
Alfares, H. K., & Duffuaa, S. O. (2009). Assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision making based on ordinal ranking. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15(5–6), 125–133.
Alkire, S. (2002a). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.
Alkire, S. (2002b). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S. (2007). Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty. In N. Kakwanit & J. Silber (Eds.), The many dimensions of poverty (pp. 89–119). New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Alkire, S. & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (7–8), 476.
Alkire, S. & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. Working paper 38. Oxford poverty and human development initiative.
Baldwin, M. L., & Marcus, S. C. (2007). Labor market outcomes of persons with mental disorders. Industrial Relations, 46, 481–510.
Banthin, J. S., & Bernard, D. M. (2006). Changes in financial burdens for health care: National estimates for the population younger than 65 years, 1996–2003. JAMA, 296, 2712–2719.
Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L. (2006). Children—conceptualizing their capabilities: Results of a survey conducted during the first children’s world congress on child labour. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 77(1), 59–83.
Breslau, J., Miller, E., Joanie Chung, W. J., & Schweitzer, J. B. (2011). Childhood and adolescent onset psychiatric disorders, substance use, and failure to graduate high school on time. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(3), 295–301.
Burkhauser, R., Houtenvile, A., & Rovba, L. (2009). Poverty. In counting working-age people with disabilities (pp. 192–226). Kalamazoo, MI: Up John Institute for Employment Research.
Chambers, R. (2003). The best of both worlds. In Kanbur, R. (Ed.).
Chambers, R. (2007). Participation and Poverty. Development, 50(2), 20–25.
Citro, C. F. & Michael, R. T. (1995). Measuring poverty: A new approach. Panel on poverty and family assistance: Concepts, information needs, and measurement methods. National Research Council.
Colton, C. W., & Manderscheid, R. W. (2007). Congruencies in increased mortality rates, years of potential life lost, and causes of death among public mental health clients in eight states. Preventing Chronic Disease, 3(2), 1–14.
Cook, J. A. (2006). Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities: Update of a report for the president’s commission. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1391–1405.
de Kruijk, H. & Rutten, M. (2007). Weighting dimensions of poverty based on peoples priorities: Constructing a composite poverty index for the Maldives. Q-squared working paper 35. Toronto: Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto.
Decancq, K. & Lugo, M. A. (2008). Setting weights in multidimensional indices of well being and deprivation. Background working paper for the Oxford poverty and human development initiative workshop on weighting dimensions, Oxford, UK, 26–27 May 2008.
Dickerson, F. B., Boronow, J. J., Ringel, N., & Parente, F. (1999). Social functioning and neurocognitive deficits in outpatients with schizophrenia: A 2-year follow-up. Schizophrenia Research, 37(1), 13–20.
Dickey, B., Azeni, H., Weiss, R., & Sederer, L. (2000). Schizophrenia, substance use disorders and medical co-morbidity. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 3, 27–33.
Druss, B. G., & Rosenheck, R. A. (1998). Mental disorders and access to medical care in the United States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(12), 1775–1777.
Farina, A., & Ring, K. (1965). The influence of perceived mental illness on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 70, 47–51.
Ferketich, A. K., & Binkley, P. F. (2005). Psychological distress and cardiovascular disease: Results from the 2002 national health interview survey. European Heart Journal, 26(18), 1923–1929.
Hopper, K., & Lincoln, A. (2009). Participation in public mental health research: A conceptual framework and report from practice. In J. Wallcroft, B. Schrank, & M. Amering (Eds.), Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research (pp. 73–86). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hunt, J., Eisenberg, D., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2010). Consequences of receipt of a psychiatric diagnosis for completion of college. Psychiatric Services, 61, 399–404.
Kakwani, N. & Silber, J. (Eds.) (2008). Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kanbur, R. (Ed). (2003). Q squared: Qualitative and quantitative methods of poverty appraisal. India: Orient Blackswan.
Kessler, R. C., Heeringa, S., Lakoma, M. D., Petukhova, M., Rupp, A., Schoenbaum, M., et al. (2008). Individuals and societal effects of mental disorder on earnings in the United States: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 703–711.
LeCook, B., McGuire, T. G., Lock, K., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2010). Comparing methods of racial and ethnic disparities measurement across different settings of mental health care. Health Services Research, 45, 825–847.
Lehman, A. F., & Cordray, D. S. (1993). Prevalence of alcohol, drug and mental disorders among the homeless. Contemporary Drug Problems, 20, 355–383.
Manderscheid, R., Druss, B., & Freeman, E. (2008). Data to manage the mortality crisis. International Journal of Mental Health, 37(2), 49–68.
Markowitz, F. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39(4), 335–347.
Narayan, D. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us? Washington, DC: World Bank.
Nicholson, J., Biebel, K., Hinden, B., Henry, A., & Stier, L. (2001a). Critical issues for parents with mental illness and their families. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Nicholson, J., Larkin, C., Simon, L., & Banks, S. (2001b). The prevalence of parenting among adults with mental illness. Working paper. Massachusetts: Center for Mental Health Services Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Hara, B. (2004). Do medical out-of-pocket expenses thrust families into poverty? Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 15(1), 63–75.
Piatt, E. E., Munetz, M. R., & Ritter, C. (2010). An examination of premature mortality among decedents with serious mental illness and those in the general population. Psychiatric Services, 61(7), 663–668.
Pratt, L. A., Dey, A. N., & Cohen, A. J. (2007). Characteristics of adults with serious psychological distress as measured by the K6 scale. Advance Data, 382, 1–18.
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92.
Robeyns, I. (2005). Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74, 191–215.
Robeyns, I. (2006). The capabilities approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 351–376.
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (1997). On economic inequality. New York: Clarendon Oxford Press.
Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Siegel, C., Samuels, J., Tang, D.-I., Berg, I., Jones, K., & Hopper, J. (2006). Tenant outcomes in supported housing and community residences in New York City. Psychiatric Services, 57, 982–991.
Stewart, F. (2001). Book review of women and human development by Martha Nussbaum. Journal of International Development, 13, 1189–1202.
Stewart, W. J. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 185–204.
Teplin, L. A., McClelland, G. M., Abram, K. A., & Weiner, D. A. (2005a). Crime victimization in adults with severe mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 911–921.
Teplin, L. A., McClelland, G. M., Abram, K. M., & Weiner, D. A. (2005b). Crime victimization in adults with severe mental illness comparison with the national crime victimization survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(8), 911–921.
Trani, J.-F., Biggeri, M. & Mauro, V. (Forthcoming). The Multidimensionality of child poverty: Evidence from Afghanistan. Social Indicators Research.
Vick, B., Jones, K., & Mitra, S. (2010). Poverty and psychiatric diagnosis in the U.S.: Evidence from the medical expenditure panel survey. Fordham, Working paper.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., & Eng, E. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Summary, evidence report/technology assessment: number 99. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by the Center to Study Recovery in Social Contexts, funded by a 5 year NIH grant P20MH078188 to Dr. Alexander.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We have benefited from insightful comments on an earlier version by Sabina Alkire, Kim Hopper, and seminar participants at the 2009 New Approaches in Welfare Conference (Oxford University), the 2009 American Public Health Association meeting and the 2010 National Institute of Mental Health Biennial Economics Conference, Fordham University and the Center to Study Recovery in Social Contexts.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitra, S., Jones, K., Vick, B. et al. Implementing a Multidimensional Poverty Measure Using Mixed Methods and a Participatory Framework. Soc Indic Res 110, 1061–1081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9972-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9972-9