Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

More Spousal Support for Men Than for Women: A Comparison of Sources and Types of Support

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Types and sources of received support among 902 Costa Rican employees were examined; gender and age differences as well as associations with mental health were considered. Four types of support (advice giving, assistance, reassurance, and empathic listening) were measured as received from four sources, namely friends, family, spouses, and groups/organizations. Support types were not very distinct, therefore we aggregated sum scores across these variables. In contrast, sources were discriminant and had to be analyzed separately. An interaction between gender and age pointed to a larger discrepancy of received spousal support in middle-aged men and women than in younger ones. The older the women were, the less support they received from their spouses. In addition to this interaction, further gender differences emerged at the correlation level, where the association between spousal support and depression was significant for men only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles, 17, 737–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belle, D. (1982). The stress of caring: Women as providers of social support. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 496–505). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Underwood, S., & Gottlieb, B. (2000). Social support measures and intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL): A self-report inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 1–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel-Schetter, C., Feinstein, L., & Call, J. (1986). UCLA Social Support Inventory (UCLA-SSI). Unpublished psychometric instrument. Los Angeles: University of California.

  • DuPertuis, L. L., Aldwin, C. M., & Bossé, R. (2003). Does the source of support matter for different health outcomes? Findings from the normative aging study. Retrieved January 31, 2003, from http://hcd.ucdavis.edu/faculty/aldwin/Support.pdf.

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (1998). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. In M. P. Lawton & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Essential papers on the psychology of aging (pp. 511–538). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, L. M., Christenfeld, N., & Gerin, W. (1999). Gender, social support, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 234–242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenglass, E. R. (1982). A world of difference: Gender roles in perspective. Toronto: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, M., Kuijer, R. G., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Wobbes, T., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychology, 19, 274–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1986). Stress, social support, and women. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, T., & Winkeler, M. (2002). Gender, mental health status, and social support during a stressful event. In G. Weidner, M. Kopp, & M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender [NATO Science Series, Series I: Life and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 327] (pp. 223–236). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Gender and age differences in social support: A study of East German refugees. In G. Weidner, M. S. Kopp, & M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender [NATO Science Series 1: Life and behavioural sciences, Vol. 327] (pp. 198–210). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer, R. G., Ybema, J. F., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Thijs-Boer, G., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 256–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, A. W., & Burleson, B. R. (1999). Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts. Human Communication Research, 25, 307–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laireiter, A., & Baumann, U. (1992). Network structures and support functions: Theoretical and empirical analyses. In H. O. F. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 33–55). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1998): Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. In M. P. Lawton & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Essential papers on the psychology of aging (pp. 445–462). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson, K. D., Helgeson, V. S., & Weiner, E. (1995). Gender effects on social support provision and receipt. Personal Relationships, 2, 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M. D. (1990). What structural equation modeling can tell us about social support. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 26–63). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219–230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasch, L. A., Bradbury, T. N., & Davila, J. (1997). Gender, negative affectivity, and observed social support behavior in marital interaction. Personal Relationships, 4, 361–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., Bullinger, M., Harper, A., & World Health Organization Quality of Life Group, Switzerland. (1999). The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychology, 18, 495–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, K. E. E., Schwarzer, R., & Endler, N. S. (1997). Predicting cardiac patients’ quality of life from the characteristics of their spouses. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 231– 244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 716–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Kemeny, M. (1994). The multidimensional nature of received social support in gay men at risk of HIV infections and AIDS. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 319–339.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Leppin, A. (1992). Social support and mental health: A conceptual and empirical overview. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 435–458). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416–423.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1991). Gender differences in coping with emotional distress. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 107–138). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uno, D., Uchino, B. N., & Smith, T. W. (2002). Relationship quality moderates the effect of social support given by close friends of cardiovascular reactivity in women. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 9, 243– 262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A., & Fegan, M. F. (2001). Social networks and social support. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 209–234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–563.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Schwarzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarzer, R., Gutiérrez-Doña, B. More Spousal Support for Men Than for Women: A Comparison of Sources and Types of Support. Sex Roles 52, 523–532 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3718-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3718-6

Keywords

Navigation