Skip to main content
Log in

Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using bibliographic records from the Science Citation Index, the paper examines the publication of South African scientists. The analysis shows that collaboration research in South Africa has been growing steadily and the scientists are highly oriented towards collaborative rather than individualistic research. International collaboration is preferred to domestic collaboration while publication seems to be a decisive factor in collaboration. The paper also looks at the collaboration dimensions of partnering countries, sectors and disciplines, and examines how collaboration can be predicted by certain publication variables. Characteristic features are evident in both the degree and nature of collaboration which can be predicted by the number of countries involved, number of partners and the fractional count of papers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anuradha, K. T., Urs, S. R. (2007), Bibliometric indicators of Indian research collaboration patterns: A correspondence analysis. Scientometrics, 71: 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., Gaillard, J. (2000), Science in Africa: a bibliometric panorama using PASCAL database. Scientometrics, 47: 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D., Rosen, R. (1978), Studies in scientific collaboration, part I: the professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1: 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., Simar, L. (2006), Advanced indicators of productivity of universities: An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66: 389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Boardman, C. (2003), Research and Technology Collaboration and Linkages: Implications from two U.S. Case Studies. Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, http://www.csta-cest.ca/files/usa.pdf Accessed 24 April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Corley, E. (2004), Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33: 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duque, R. B., Sooryamoorthy, R., Ynalvez, M., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D.-B., Shrum, W. (2005), Collaboration paradox: scientific productivity, the internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35: 755–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000), The dynamic of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29: 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahat, H. (2002), Authorship patterns in agricultural sciences in Egypt. Scientometrics, 55: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, D. J., Narin, F., Carpenter, M. P. (1977), The distribution of world science. Social Studies of Science, 7: 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, J. D., Carpenter, M. P. (1979), International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9: 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Lange, C. D. (2002), A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54: 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., Ma, N. (2007), A bibliometric study of China’s semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics, 70: 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. M., Katz, J. S. (1996), Where is science going? Science, Technology and Human Values, 21: 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P., Jacobs, D. (2004), South African research in selected scientific areas: status 1981–2000. Scientometrics, 59: 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., Ingwersen, P. (2000), A bibliometric study of the publication patterns in the sciences of South African scholars 1981–96. Scientometrics, 47: 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-W. (2006), Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: taking the context into consideration. Scientometrics, 66: 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Amara, N. (1998), The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy, 27: 901–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Traore, N., Godin, B. (1996), An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity. Higher Education, 32: 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002), Collaboration and reward: what do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Bozeman, B. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35: 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, N., Guan, J. (2005), An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology. Scientometrics, 65: 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997), The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275: 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G. (2000), Pragmatism and self-organization research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29: 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Russel, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., Gaillard, J. (2002), Science in Africa: an overview of mainstream scientific output. Scientometrics, 54: 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001), The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98: 404–409.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004), Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101: 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pao, M. L. (1982), Collaboration in computations musicology. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 33: 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, D., Andrews, F. (1966), Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates of Research and Development. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A. (2003), South Africa’s research publication record: the last ten years. South African Journal of Science, 99: 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. S. (1963), Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. S., Beaver, D. (1966), Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21: 1011–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R., Shrum, W. (2007), Does the internet promote collaboration and productivity? Evidence from the scientific community in South Africa. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12: 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R., Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M. A., Shrum, W. (2007), Scientific collaboration and the Kerala model: does the internet make a difference? Journal of International Development, 19: 982–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007), Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: new analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71: 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Leyesdorff, L. (2005), Mapping the network of global science: comparing international coauthorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1: 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, K, Bassecoulard, E., Okubo, Y. (2000), Shadows of the past in international cooperation: collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47: 627–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1967), Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration and authorship. American Sociological Review, 32: 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radhamany Sooryamoorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sooryamoorthy, R. Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa?. Scientometrics 80, 419–439 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2074-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2074-z

Keywords

Navigation